早期至中度青光眼患者阅读能力的结构与功能关系。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
European Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1177/11206721241231330
Serpil Akar, Oya Tekeli, Aysun Idil, Zeynep Kayaarasi Ozturker
{"title":"早期至中度青光眼患者阅读能力的结构与功能关系。","authors":"Serpil Akar, Oya Tekeli, Aysun Idil, Zeynep Kayaarasi Ozturker","doi":"10.1177/11206721241231330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess reading performance in patients with mild to moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), and to determine the relationship between reading ability and visual field (VF), microperimetry, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Reading performance of 30 POAG patients examined by the Minnesota Reading Acuity Chart (MNREAD) was compared to that of 21 age-matched controls collected from Ankara University in Turkey. Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 24-2 SITA Standard and 10-2 patterns, and microperimetry were used for VF measurements. All subjects underwent OCT analysis for retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT), optic nerve head (ONH) measurements, and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer thickness (GCIPLT). The linear relationship between reading parameters and VF, microperimetry, and OCT parameters was investigated. Univariate and multiple logistic regression models were used to identify the risk factors for glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In POAG patients, maximum reading speed (MRS) had a significant association with average rim area, mean cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), and cup volume (<i>p</i> < 0.05, for all). Decreased MRS was associated with thinner average GCIPLT and inferotemporal, superior, and inferior GCIPLT quadrants (<i>p</i> < 0.05, for all). Global index values for the HFA 24-2/10-2 tests, microperimetry, and ONH/RNFLT parameters had no correlation with reading performance. After accounting for the better and worse eyes, gender, education, age, and visual acuity of the glaucoma patients, MRS score was 23 units lower in the worse eye (<i>p</i> = 0.009), critical print size (CPS) was 0.21 units larger in the better eye (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and 0.25 units larger in the worse eye (<i>p</i> < 0.001), reading accesibility index (ACC) was 0.11 units lower in the better eye (<i>p</i> = 0.02) and 0.13 units lower in the worse eye (<i>p</i> = 0.002), and RA was 0.13 units higher in the worse eye (<i>p</i> = 0.003) of POAG patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POAG had significantly lower reading performance when compared to healthy subjects. Reading speed was associated with decreased macular GCIPLT indicating that reading performance may be affected in the earlier stages of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structure-function relationship of reading performance in patients with early to moderate glaucoma.\",\"authors\":\"Serpil Akar, Oya Tekeli, Aysun Idil, Zeynep Kayaarasi Ozturker\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11206721241231330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess reading performance in patients with mild to moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), and to determine the relationship between reading ability and visual field (VF), microperimetry, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Reading performance of 30 POAG patients examined by the Minnesota Reading Acuity Chart (MNREAD) was compared to that of 21 age-matched controls collected from Ankara University in Turkey. Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 24-2 SITA Standard and 10-2 patterns, and microperimetry were used for VF measurements. All subjects underwent OCT analysis for retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT), optic nerve head (ONH) measurements, and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer thickness (GCIPLT). The linear relationship between reading parameters and VF, microperimetry, and OCT parameters was investigated. Univariate and multiple logistic regression models were used to identify the risk factors for glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In POAG patients, maximum reading speed (MRS) had a significant association with average rim area, mean cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), and cup volume (<i>p</i> < 0.05, for all). Decreased MRS was associated with thinner average GCIPLT and inferotemporal, superior, and inferior GCIPLT quadrants (<i>p</i> < 0.05, for all). Global index values for the HFA 24-2/10-2 tests, microperimetry, and ONH/RNFLT parameters had no correlation with reading performance. After accounting for the better and worse eyes, gender, education, age, and visual acuity of the glaucoma patients, MRS score was 23 units lower in the worse eye (<i>p</i> = 0.009), critical print size (CPS) was 0.21 units larger in the better eye (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and 0.25 units larger in the worse eye (<i>p</i> < 0.001), reading accesibility index (ACC) was 0.11 units lower in the better eye (<i>p</i> = 0.02) and 0.13 units lower in the worse eye (<i>p</i> = 0.002), and RA was 0.13 units higher in the worse eye (<i>p</i> = 0.003) of POAG patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POAG had significantly lower reading performance when compared to healthy subjects. Reading speed was associated with decreased macular GCIPLT indicating that reading performance may be affected in the earlier stages of the disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241231330\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241231330","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估轻度至中度原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者的阅读能力,并确定阅读能力与视野(VF)、显微视力测定和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)参数之间的关系:方法:将使用明尼苏达阅读敏锐度表(MNREAD)检查的 30 名 POAG 患者的阅读能力与从土耳其安卡拉大学收集的 21 名年龄匹配的对照者的阅读能力进行比较。汉弗莱视场分析仪(Humphrey Field Analyzer,HFA)24-2 SITA 标准和 10-2 模式以及显微视力计被用于视力测量。所有受试者都接受了视网膜神经纤维层厚度(RNFLT)、视神经头(ONH)测量和神经节细胞内丛状层厚度(GCIPLT)的 OCT 分析。研究了阅读参数与 VF、显微视力计和 OCT 参数之间的线性关系。采用单变量和多元逻辑回归模型确定青光眼的风险因素:在 POAG 患者中,最大阅读速度(MRS)与平均眼缘面积、平均杯盘比(CDR)和杯体积有显著关联(p p = 0.009),临界打印尺寸(CPS)在较好的眼睛中大 0.21 个单位(p = 0.03),较差眼睛大 0.25 个单位(p p = 0.02),较差眼睛小 0.13 个单位(p = 0.002),POAG 患者较差眼睛的 RA 高 0.13 个单位(p = 0.003):结论:与健康受试者相比,POAG 患者的阅读能力明显较低。阅读速度与黄斑 GCIPLT 的降低有关,这表明阅读能力可能在疾病的早期阶段就会受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Structure-function relationship of reading performance in patients with early to moderate glaucoma.

Purpose: To assess reading performance in patients with mild to moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), and to determine the relationship between reading ability and visual field (VF), microperimetry, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters.

Methods: Reading performance of 30 POAG patients examined by the Minnesota Reading Acuity Chart (MNREAD) was compared to that of 21 age-matched controls collected from Ankara University in Turkey. Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 24-2 SITA Standard and 10-2 patterns, and microperimetry were used for VF measurements. All subjects underwent OCT analysis for retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT), optic nerve head (ONH) measurements, and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer thickness (GCIPLT). The linear relationship between reading parameters and VF, microperimetry, and OCT parameters was investigated. Univariate and multiple logistic regression models were used to identify the risk factors for glaucoma.

Results: In POAG patients, maximum reading speed (MRS) had a significant association with average rim area, mean cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), and cup volume (p < 0.05, for all). Decreased MRS was associated with thinner average GCIPLT and inferotemporal, superior, and inferior GCIPLT quadrants (p < 0.05, for all). Global index values for the HFA 24-2/10-2 tests, microperimetry, and ONH/RNFLT parameters had no correlation with reading performance. After accounting for the better and worse eyes, gender, education, age, and visual acuity of the glaucoma patients, MRS score was 23 units lower in the worse eye (p = 0.009), critical print size (CPS) was 0.21 units larger in the better eye (p = 0.03) and 0.25 units larger in the worse eye (p < 0.001), reading accesibility index (ACC) was 0.11 units lower in the better eye (p = 0.02) and 0.13 units lower in the worse eye (p = 0.002), and RA was 0.13 units higher in the worse eye (p = 0.003) of POAG patients.

Conclusion: POAG had significantly lower reading performance when compared to healthy subjects. Reading speed was associated with decreased macular GCIPLT indicating that reading performance may be affected in the earlier stages of the disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信