非吸收性骨异体移植的发展:生物背景和临床前景。

IF 17.5 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Periodontology 2000 Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1111/prd.12551
Richard J Miron, Masako Fujioka-Kobayashi, Michael A Pikos, Toshiaki Nakamura, Takatomo Imafuji, Yufeng Zhang, Yukiya Shinohara, Anton Sculean, Yoshinori Shirakata
{"title":"非吸收性骨异体移植的发展:生物背景和临床前景。","authors":"Richard J Miron, Masako Fujioka-Kobayashi, Michael A Pikos, Toshiaki Nakamura, Takatomo Imafuji, Yufeng Zhang, Yukiya Shinohara, Anton Sculean, Yoshinori Shirakata","doi":"10.1111/prd.12551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bone grafts are typically categorized into four categories: autografts, allografts, xenografts, and synthetic alloplasts. While it was originally thought that all bone grafts should be slowly resorbed and replaced with native bone over time, accumulating evidence has in fact suggested that the use of nonresorbable xenografts is favored for certain clinical indications. Thus, many clinicians take advantage of the nonresorbable properties/features of xenografts for various clinical indications, such as contour augmentation, sinus grafting, and guided bone regeneration, which are often combined with allografts (e.g., human freeze-dried bone allografts [FDBAs] and human demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts [DFDBAs]). Thus, many clinicians have advocated different 50/50 or 70/30 ratios of allograft/xenograft combination approaches for various grafting procedures. Interestingly, many clinicians believe that one of the main reasons for the nonresorbability or low substitution rates of xenografts has to do with their foreign animal origin. Recent research has indicated that the sintering technique and heating conducted during their processing changes the dissolution rate of hydroxyapatite, leading to a state in which osteoclasts are no longer able to resorb (dissolve) the sintered bone. While many clinicians often combine nonresorbable xenografts with the bone-inducing properties of allografts for a variety of bone augmentation procedures, clinicians are forced to use two separate products owing to their origins (the FDA/CE does not allow the mixture of allografts with xenografts within the same dish/bottle). This has led to significant progress in understanding the dissolution rates of xenografts at various sintering temperature changes, which has since led to the breakthrough development of nonresorbable bone allografts sintered at similar temperatures to nonresorbable xenografts. The advantage of the nonresorbable bone allograft is that they can now be combined with standard allografts to create a single mixture combining the advantages of both allografts and xenografts while allowing the purchase and use of a single product. This review article presents the concept with evidence derived from a 52-week monkey study that demonstrated little to no resorption along with in vitro data supporting this novel technology as a \"next-generation\" biomaterial with optimized bone grafting material properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":19736,"journal":{"name":"Periodontology 2000","volume":" ","pages":"161-179"},"PeriodicalIF":17.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The development of non-resorbable bone allografts: Biological background and clinical perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Richard J Miron, Masako Fujioka-Kobayashi, Michael A Pikos, Toshiaki Nakamura, Takatomo Imafuji, Yufeng Zhang, Yukiya Shinohara, Anton Sculean, Yoshinori Shirakata\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/prd.12551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bone grafts are typically categorized into four categories: autografts, allografts, xenografts, and synthetic alloplasts. While it was originally thought that all bone grafts should be slowly resorbed and replaced with native bone over time, accumulating evidence has in fact suggested that the use of nonresorbable xenografts is favored for certain clinical indications. Thus, many clinicians take advantage of the nonresorbable properties/features of xenografts for various clinical indications, such as contour augmentation, sinus grafting, and guided bone regeneration, which are often combined with allografts (e.g., human freeze-dried bone allografts [FDBAs] and human demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts [DFDBAs]). Thus, many clinicians have advocated different 50/50 or 70/30 ratios of allograft/xenograft combination approaches for various grafting procedures. Interestingly, many clinicians believe that one of the main reasons for the nonresorbability or low substitution rates of xenografts has to do with their foreign animal origin. Recent research has indicated that the sintering technique and heating conducted during their processing changes the dissolution rate of hydroxyapatite, leading to a state in which osteoclasts are no longer able to resorb (dissolve) the sintered bone. While many clinicians often combine nonresorbable xenografts with the bone-inducing properties of allografts for a variety of bone augmentation procedures, clinicians are forced to use two separate products owing to their origins (the FDA/CE does not allow the mixture of allografts with xenografts within the same dish/bottle). This has led to significant progress in understanding the dissolution rates of xenografts at various sintering temperature changes, which has since led to the breakthrough development of nonresorbable bone allografts sintered at similar temperatures to nonresorbable xenografts. The advantage of the nonresorbable bone allograft is that they can now be combined with standard allografts to create a single mixture combining the advantages of both allografts and xenografts while allowing the purchase and use of a single product. This review article presents the concept with evidence derived from a 52-week monkey study that demonstrated little to no resorption along with in vitro data supporting this novel technology as a \\\"next-generation\\\" biomaterial with optimized bone grafting material properties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Periodontology 2000\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"161-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":17.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Periodontology 2000\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12551\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodontology 2000","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12551","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骨移植通常分为四类:自体移植、异体移植、异种移植和合成异体。虽然人们最初认为所有的骨移植物都应该随着时间的推移慢慢吸收并被本地骨取代,但事实上,越来越多的证据表明,在某些临床适应症中,使用不可吸收的异种移植物更受青睐。因此,许多临床医生利用异种移植物的不吸收特性/特征,将其用于各种临床适应症,如轮廓增大、上颌窦移植和引导性骨再生,并经常与同种异体移植物(如人类冻干骨同种异体移植物[FDBAs]和人类去矿物质冻干骨同种异体移植物[DFDBAs])结合使用。因此,许多临床医生都主张在不同的移植手术中采用 50/50 或 70/30 不同比例的异体骨/异种骨组合方法。有趣的是,许多临床医生认为异种移植物不可吸收或替代率低的主要原因之一与异种动物来源有关。最近的研究表明,烧结技术和加工过程中的加热改变了羟基磷灰石的溶解速度,导致破骨细胞无法再吸收(溶解)烧结骨。虽然许多临床医生经常将不可吸收的异种移植物与具有骨诱导特性的异种移植物结合起来,用于各种骨增量手术,但由于其来源不同,临床医生不得不使用两种不同的产品(FDA/CE 不允许将异种移植物与异种移植物混合在同一盘/瓶中)。这使得人们在了解异种移植物在不同烧结温度变化下的溶解速率方面取得了重大进展,从而突破性地开发出了在与非吸收性异种移植物相似的温度下烧结的非吸收性骨异种移植物。不可吸收骨异体移植物的优势在于,它们现在可以与标准异体移植物结合,形成一种单一的混合物,结合了异体移植物和异种移植物的优点,同时允许购买和使用单一产品。这篇综述文章介绍了这一概念,其证据来自于一项为期 52 周的猴子研究,该研究表明几乎没有骨吸收,同时体外数据也支持这种新型技术成为具有优化骨移植材料特性的 "下一代 "生物材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The development of non-resorbable bone allografts: Biological background and clinical perspectives.

Bone grafts are typically categorized into four categories: autografts, allografts, xenografts, and synthetic alloplasts. While it was originally thought that all bone grafts should be slowly resorbed and replaced with native bone over time, accumulating evidence has in fact suggested that the use of nonresorbable xenografts is favored for certain clinical indications. Thus, many clinicians take advantage of the nonresorbable properties/features of xenografts for various clinical indications, such as contour augmentation, sinus grafting, and guided bone regeneration, which are often combined with allografts (e.g., human freeze-dried bone allografts [FDBAs] and human demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts [DFDBAs]). Thus, many clinicians have advocated different 50/50 or 70/30 ratios of allograft/xenograft combination approaches for various grafting procedures. Interestingly, many clinicians believe that one of the main reasons for the nonresorbability or low substitution rates of xenografts has to do with their foreign animal origin. Recent research has indicated that the sintering technique and heating conducted during their processing changes the dissolution rate of hydroxyapatite, leading to a state in which osteoclasts are no longer able to resorb (dissolve) the sintered bone. While many clinicians often combine nonresorbable xenografts with the bone-inducing properties of allografts for a variety of bone augmentation procedures, clinicians are forced to use two separate products owing to their origins (the FDA/CE does not allow the mixture of allografts with xenografts within the same dish/bottle). This has led to significant progress in understanding the dissolution rates of xenografts at various sintering temperature changes, which has since led to the breakthrough development of nonresorbable bone allografts sintered at similar temperatures to nonresorbable xenografts. The advantage of the nonresorbable bone allograft is that they can now be combined with standard allografts to create a single mixture combining the advantages of both allografts and xenografts while allowing the purchase and use of a single product. This review article presents the concept with evidence derived from a 52-week monkey study that demonstrated little to no resorption along with in vitro data supporting this novel technology as a "next-generation" biomaterial with optimized bone grafting material properties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Periodontology 2000
Periodontology 2000 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
34.10
自引率
2.20%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Periodontology 2000 is a series of monographs designed for periodontists and general practitioners interested in periodontics. The editorial board selects significant topics and distinguished scientists and clinicians for each monograph. Serving as a valuable supplement to existing periodontal journals, three monographs are published annually, contributing specialized insights to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信