Kushal U. Agrawal, Matthew R. Barke, Lawrence Chiang, Roselind Ni, Rachel S. Kim, Qiang Zhang, Carol L. Shields
{"title":"823 名葡萄膜黑色素瘤患者的菲茨帕特里克皮肤类型和虹膜颜色与肿瘤大小的相关性。","authors":"Kushal U. Agrawal, Matthew R. Barke, Lawrence Chiang, Roselind Ni, Rachel S. Kim, Qiang Zhang, Carol L. Shields","doi":"10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine the correlation of Fitzpatrick Skin Type (FST) and iris color with tumor size (tumor thickness and basal diameter) in patients with uveal melanoma.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective Cohort</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective cohort from a single ocular oncology center of 823 patients with uveal melanoma and documented FST, iris color, and tumor size. Patients were classified by FST (type I, II, and III–V) and iris color (blue, green, and brown) on the basis of external facial photography. There were no FST type VI patients. Tumor thickness was classified into small [< 3 millimeter (mm)], medium (3.1–8.0 mm), or large (> 8.0 mm), and basal diameter into small (< 10 mm), medium (10.1–15 mm) or large (> 15 mm). The correlation of FST and iris color with tumor thickness and basal diameter was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis H test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The FST classification was type I (n = 92, 11%), type II (n = 643, 78%), or III–V (n = 88, 11%), and iris color was blue (n = 472, 57%), green (n = 102, 12%), or brown (n = 249, 30%). A comparison of FST revealed differences in mean tumor thickness (<em>P</em> = 0.04) and basal diameter (<em>P</em> = 0.006). Iris color showed no difference for mean tumor thickness (<em>P</em> = 0.41) or basal diameter (<em>P</em> = 0.48). There was a statistically significant difference with brown iris color relative to FST III–V for mean tumor thickness (<em>P</em> = 0.003) and basal diameter (<em>P</em> = 0.001) but no difference with blue or green iris color (<em>P</em> > 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Iris color alone showed no difference in tumor size, but those with brown iris color and FST type III–V demonstrated larger tumor thickness and basal diameter.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8594,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"13 2","pages":"Article 100046"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162098924000306/pdfft?md5=706bc3e2d29bb003370b1e8f2b6e285c&pid=1-s2.0-S2162098924000306-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation of fitzpatrick skin type and iris color with tumor size in 823 patients with uveal melanoma\",\"authors\":\"Kushal U. Agrawal, Matthew R. Barke, Lawrence Chiang, Roselind Ni, Rachel S. Kim, Qiang Zhang, Carol L. Shields\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine the correlation of Fitzpatrick Skin Type (FST) and iris color with tumor size (tumor thickness and basal diameter) in patients with uveal melanoma.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective Cohort</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective cohort from a single ocular oncology center of 823 patients with uveal melanoma and documented FST, iris color, and tumor size. Patients were classified by FST (type I, II, and III–V) and iris color (blue, green, and brown) on the basis of external facial photography. There were no FST type VI patients. Tumor thickness was classified into small [< 3 millimeter (mm)], medium (3.1–8.0 mm), or large (> 8.0 mm), and basal diameter into small (< 10 mm), medium (10.1–15 mm) or large (> 15 mm). The correlation of FST and iris color with tumor thickness and basal diameter was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis H test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The FST classification was type I (n = 92, 11%), type II (n = 643, 78%), or III–V (n = 88, 11%), and iris color was blue (n = 472, 57%), green (n = 102, 12%), or brown (n = 249, 30%). A comparison of FST revealed differences in mean tumor thickness (<em>P</em> = 0.04) and basal diameter (<em>P</em> = 0.006). Iris color showed no difference for mean tumor thickness (<em>P</em> = 0.41) or basal diameter (<em>P</em> = 0.48). There was a statistically significant difference with brown iris color relative to FST III–V for mean tumor thickness (<em>P</em> = 0.003) and basal diameter (<em>P</em> = 0.001) but no difference with blue or green iris color (<em>P</em> > 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Iris color alone showed no difference in tumor size, but those with brown iris color and FST type III–V demonstrated larger tumor thickness and basal diameter.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100046\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162098924000306/pdfft?md5=706bc3e2d29bb003370b1e8f2b6e285c&pid=1-s2.0-S2162098924000306-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162098924000306\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162098924000306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Correlation of fitzpatrick skin type and iris color with tumor size in 823 patients with uveal melanoma
Purpose
To determine the correlation of Fitzpatrick Skin Type (FST) and iris color with tumor size (tumor thickness and basal diameter) in patients with uveal melanoma.
Design
Retrospective Cohort
Methods
Retrospective cohort from a single ocular oncology center of 823 patients with uveal melanoma and documented FST, iris color, and tumor size. Patients were classified by FST (type I, II, and III–V) and iris color (blue, green, and brown) on the basis of external facial photography. There were no FST type VI patients. Tumor thickness was classified into small [< 3 millimeter (mm)], medium (3.1–8.0 mm), or large (> 8.0 mm), and basal diameter into small (< 10 mm), medium (10.1–15 mm) or large (> 15 mm). The correlation of FST and iris color with tumor thickness and basal diameter was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis H test.
Results
The FST classification was type I (n = 92, 11%), type II (n = 643, 78%), or III–V (n = 88, 11%), and iris color was blue (n = 472, 57%), green (n = 102, 12%), or brown (n = 249, 30%). A comparison of FST revealed differences in mean tumor thickness (P = 0.04) and basal diameter (P = 0.006). Iris color showed no difference for mean tumor thickness (P = 0.41) or basal diameter (P = 0.48). There was a statistically significant difference with brown iris color relative to FST III–V for mean tumor thickness (P = 0.003) and basal diameter (P = 0.001) but no difference with blue or green iris color (P > 0.05).
Conclusions
Iris color alone showed no difference in tumor size, but those with brown iris color and FST type III–V demonstrated larger tumor thickness and basal diameter.
期刊介绍:
The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, a bimonthly, peer-reviewed online scientific publication, is an official publication of the Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology (APAO), a supranational organization which is committed to research, training, learning, publication and knowledge and skill transfers in ophthalmology and visual sciences. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology welcomes review articles on currently hot topics, original, previously unpublished manuscripts describing clinical investigations, clinical observations and clinically relevant laboratory investigations, as well as .perspectives containing personal viewpoints on topics with broad interests. Editorials are published by invitation only. Case reports are generally not considered. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology covers 16 subspecialties and is freely circulated among individual members of the APAO’s member societies, which amounts to a potential readership of over 50,000.