不同化学溶剂对正畸托槽粘接强度的影响:体外研究

Q3 Dentistry
Rashtra Bhushan, Shivani Singh, George Sam, Navin Oommen Thomas, Tony Michael, Reshma Amin
{"title":"不同化学溶剂对正畸托槽粘接强度的影响:体外研究","authors":"Rashtra Bhushan, Shivani Singh, George Sam, Navin Oommen Thomas, Tony Michael, Reshma Amin","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the impact of various chemical solvents on bond strength of orthodontic brackets.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred healthy human premolars with undamaged buccal surfaces that were extracted for orthodontic purposes were gathered. Using 37% orthophosphoric acid, primer, and Transbond XT adhesive, ceramic 0.018\" × 0.022\" slot orthodontic brackets were adhered to the tooth surface. Following thermocycling, all samples were divided into four groups, with 25 samples in each group: group I: control; group II: application of ethanol; group III: application of acetone; and group IV: application of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Following the debonding tests, a double-ocular stereomicroscope was used to inspect the tooth surfaces. Additionally, adhesive remnant index (ARI) values were evaluated at 40× magnification. Data were recorded and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bond strength was lesser in acetone applied group (16.18 <i>±</i> 3.64) followed by DMSO applied group (22.08 <i>±</i> 2.86), ethanol applied group (24.36 <i>±</i> 4.02), and control group (27.14 <i>±</i> 3.68). There was a highly significant difference found between the chemical solvents group. The ARI score 3 was present in control (12%), ethanol (8%), and DMSO (4%), and it was absent in acetone applied group. The ARI score 0 was more in acetone applied group (24%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study concluded that the reduced debonding force was found with the application of acetone solvent followed by DMSO, ethanol, and control groups. Applying acetone can be a substitute technique to help with ceramic bracket debonding.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Orthodontic bracket debonding cannot occur without shear bond strength (SBS). The need for an ideal debonding technique for ceramic brackets without negative consequences arises from the risk of enamel damage that frequently follows the process. Acetone treatment prior to ceramic bracket debonding could be an alternate clinical technique to preventing enamel damage and facilitating debonding. How to cite this article: Bhushan R, Singh S, Sam G, <i>et al</i>. Effect of Different Chemical Solvents on Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(12):940-943.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Different Chemical Solvents on Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Rashtra Bhushan, Shivani Singh, George Sam, Navin Oommen Thomas, Tony Michael, Reshma Amin\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the impact of various chemical solvents on bond strength of orthodontic brackets.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred healthy human premolars with undamaged buccal surfaces that were extracted for orthodontic purposes were gathered. Using 37% orthophosphoric acid, primer, and Transbond XT adhesive, ceramic 0.018\\\" × 0.022\\\" slot orthodontic brackets were adhered to the tooth surface. Following thermocycling, all samples were divided into four groups, with 25 samples in each group: group I: control; group II: application of ethanol; group III: application of acetone; and group IV: application of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Following the debonding tests, a double-ocular stereomicroscope was used to inspect the tooth surfaces. Additionally, adhesive remnant index (ARI) values were evaluated at 40× magnification. Data were recorded and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bond strength was lesser in acetone applied group (16.18 <i>±</i> 3.64) followed by DMSO applied group (22.08 <i>±</i> 2.86), ethanol applied group (24.36 <i>±</i> 4.02), and control group (27.14 <i>±</i> 3.68). There was a highly significant difference found between the chemical solvents group. The ARI score 3 was present in control (12%), ethanol (8%), and DMSO (4%), and it was absent in acetone applied group. The ARI score 0 was more in acetone applied group (24%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study concluded that the reduced debonding force was found with the application of acetone solvent followed by DMSO, ethanol, and control groups. Applying acetone can be a substitute technique to help with ceramic bracket debonding.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Orthodontic bracket debonding cannot occur without shear bond strength (SBS). The need for an ideal debonding technique for ceramic brackets without negative consequences arises from the risk of enamel damage that frequently follows the process. Acetone treatment prior to ceramic bracket debonding could be an alternate clinical technique to preventing enamel damage and facilitating debonding. How to cite this article: Bhushan R, Singh S, Sam G, <i>et al</i>. Effect of Different Chemical Solvents on Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(12):940-943.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3582\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估各种化学溶剂对正畸托槽粘接强度的影响:收集了 100 颗健康的人类前臼齿,这些牙齿的颊面未受损伤,是为了正畸目的而拔出的。使用 37% 的正磷酸、底漆和 Transbond XT 粘合剂,将 0.018" × 0.022" 槽型陶瓷正畸托槽粘附到牙齿表面。热循环后,所有样品被分为四组,每组 25 个样品:第一组:对照组;第二组:使用乙醇;第三组:使用丙酮;第四组:使用二甲基亚砜(DMSO)。脱粘测试后,使用双目立体显微镜检查牙齿表面。此外,还在 40 倍放大镜下评估了粘合残留指数(ARI)值。记录数据并进行统计分析:丙酮粘接组的粘接强度较低(16.18 ± 3.64),其次是二甲基亚砜粘接组(22.08 ± 2.86)、乙醇粘接组(24.36 ± 4.02)和对照组(27.14 ± 3.68)。化学溶剂组之间的差异非常明显。对照组(12%)、乙醇组(8%)和二甲基亚砜组(4%)出现 ARI 3 分,而丙酮组则没有。丙酮组的 ARI 得分为 0 的较多(24%):本研究得出结论:丙酮溶剂组的脱粘力较低,其次是二甲基亚砜组、乙醇组和对照组。丙酮可以作为陶瓷托槽脱粘的替代技术:正畸托槽脱粘离不开剪切粘接强度(SBS)。由于陶瓷托槽脱粘过程中经常会出现珐琅质损伤的风险,因此需要一种理想的脱粘技术来避免负面影响。陶瓷托槽脱粘前的丙酮处理可能是防止牙釉质损伤和促进脱粘的另一种临床技术。如何引用本文:不同化学溶剂对正畸托槽粘结强度的影响:体外研究。J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(12):940-943.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Different Chemical Solvents on Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An In Vitro Study.

Aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the impact of various chemical solvents on bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

Materials and methods: One hundred healthy human premolars with undamaged buccal surfaces that were extracted for orthodontic purposes were gathered. Using 37% orthophosphoric acid, primer, and Transbond XT adhesive, ceramic 0.018" × 0.022" slot orthodontic brackets were adhered to the tooth surface. Following thermocycling, all samples were divided into four groups, with 25 samples in each group: group I: control; group II: application of ethanol; group III: application of acetone; and group IV: application of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Following the debonding tests, a double-ocular stereomicroscope was used to inspect the tooth surfaces. Additionally, adhesive remnant index (ARI) values were evaluated at 40× magnification. Data were recorded and statistically analyzed.

Results: The bond strength was lesser in acetone applied group (16.18 ± 3.64) followed by DMSO applied group (22.08 ± 2.86), ethanol applied group (24.36 ± 4.02), and control group (27.14 ± 3.68). There was a highly significant difference found between the chemical solvents group. The ARI score 3 was present in control (12%), ethanol (8%), and DMSO (4%), and it was absent in acetone applied group. The ARI score 0 was more in acetone applied group (24%).

Conclusion: The present study concluded that the reduced debonding force was found with the application of acetone solvent followed by DMSO, ethanol, and control groups. Applying acetone can be a substitute technique to help with ceramic bracket debonding.

Clinical significance: Orthodontic bracket debonding cannot occur without shear bond strength (SBS). The need for an ideal debonding technique for ceramic brackets without negative consequences arises from the risk of enamel damage that frequently follows the process. Acetone treatment prior to ceramic bracket debonding could be an alternate clinical technique to preventing enamel damage and facilitating debonding. How to cite this article: Bhushan R, Singh S, Sam G, et al. Effect of Different Chemical Solvents on Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(12):940-943.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信