深吸气憋气法食管癌放疗中心脏亚结构的剂量优势。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1007/s00066-024-02197-8
Ahmed Allam Mohamed, Melina Nausikaa Douglas, Philipp Bruners, Michael J Eble
{"title":"深吸气憋气法食管癌放疗中心脏亚结构的剂量优势。","authors":"Ahmed Allam Mohamed, Melina Nausikaa Douglas, Philipp Bruners, Michael J Eble","doi":"10.1007/s00066-024-02197-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiotherapy is one of the main treatment options for patients with esophageal cancer; however, it has been linked with an increased risk of cardiac toxicities. In the current study, we evaluated the effect of planning the radiation in deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) on the dose sparing of cardiac substructures and lung.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this study, we analyzed 30 radiation therapy plans from 15 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer planned for neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Radiation plans were generated for 41.4 Gy and delivered in 1.8 Gy per fraction for free-breathing (FB) and DIBH techniques. We then conducted a comparative dosimetric analysis, evaluating target volume coverage, the impact on cardiac substructures, and lung doses across the two planning techniques for each patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant disparity in target volume dose coverage between DIBH and FB plans. However, the D<sub>mean</sub>, D2%, and V30% of the heart experienced substantial reductions in DIBH relative to FB, with values of 6.21 versus 7.02 Gy (p = 0.011), 35.28 versus 35.84 Gy (p = 0.047), and 5% versus 5.8% (p = 0.048), respectively. The D<sub>mean</sub> of the left ventricle was notably lower in DIBH compared to FB (4.27 vs. 5.12 Gy, p = 0.0018), accompanied by significant improvements in V10. Additionally, the D<sub>mean</sub> and D2% of the left coronary artery, as well as the D2% of the right coronary artery, were significantly lower in DIBH. The dosimetric impact of DIBH on cardiac substructures proved more advantageous for middle esophageal (ME) than distal esophageal (DE) tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiotherapy in DIBH could provide a method to reduce the radiation dose to the left ventricle and coronaries, which could reduce the cardiac toxicity of the modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":21998,"journal":{"name":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","volume":" ","pages":"624-632"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11186874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetric advantages for cardiac substructures in radiotherapy of esophageal cancer in deep-inspiration breath hold.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Allam Mohamed, Melina Nausikaa Douglas, Philipp Bruners, Michael J Eble\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00066-024-02197-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiotherapy is one of the main treatment options for patients with esophageal cancer; however, it has been linked with an increased risk of cardiac toxicities. In the current study, we evaluated the effect of planning the radiation in deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) on the dose sparing of cardiac substructures and lung.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this study, we analyzed 30 radiation therapy plans from 15 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer planned for neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Radiation plans were generated for 41.4 Gy and delivered in 1.8 Gy per fraction for free-breathing (FB) and DIBH techniques. We then conducted a comparative dosimetric analysis, evaluating target volume coverage, the impact on cardiac substructures, and lung doses across the two planning techniques for each patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant disparity in target volume dose coverage between DIBH and FB plans. However, the D<sub>mean</sub>, D2%, and V30% of the heart experienced substantial reductions in DIBH relative to FB, with values of 6.21 versus 7.02 Gy (p = 0.011), 35.28 versus 35.84 Gy (p = 0.047), and 5% versus 5.8% (p = 0.048), respectively. The D<sub>mean</sub> of the left ventricle was notably lower in DIBH compared to FB (4.27 vs. 5.12 Gy, p = 0.0018), accompanied by significant improvements in V10. Additionally, the D<sub>mean</sub> and D2% of the left coronary artery, as well as the D2% of the right coronary artery, were significantly lower in DIBH. The dosimetric impact of DIBH on cardiac substructures proved more advantageous for middle esophageal (ME) than distal esophageal (DE) tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiotherapy in DIBH could provide a method to reduce the radiation dose to the left ventricle and coronaries, which could reduce the cardiac toxicity of the modality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"624-632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11186874/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-024-02197-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-024-02197-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:放疗是食管癌患者的主要治疗方法之一,但它与心脏毒性风险增加有关。在当前的研究中,我们评估了在深吸气屏气(DIBH)状态下计划放疗对心脏底层结构和肺部剂量疏导的影响:在这项研究中,我们分析了 15 名食管癌患者计划接受新辅助放疗的 30 个放疗计划。自由呼吸(FB)和 DIBH 技术的放射计划剂量为 41.4 Gy,每分 1.8 Gy。然后,我们进行了剂量学对比分析,评估了两种计划技术对每位患者的靶区覆盖率、对心脏亚结构的影响以及肺部剂量:结果:DIBH 和 FB 计划在靶体积剂量覆盖方面没有明显差异。然而,相对于 FB,心脏的 Dmean、D2% 和 V30% 在 DIBH 中大幅减少,分别为 6.21 对 7.02 Gy(p = 0.011)、35.28 对 35.84 Gy(p = 0.047)和 5% 对 5.8% (p = 0.048)。与 FB 相比,DIBH 的左心室 Dmean 明显降低(4.27 对 5.12 Gy,p = 0.0018),同时 V10 也有显著改善。此外,左冠状动脉的 Dmean 和 D2% 以及右冠状动脉的 D2% 在 DIBH 中也显著降低。事实证明,DIBH对心脏下部结构的剂量影响对食管中部肿瘤(ME)比食管远端肿瘤(DE)更有利:结论:DIBH放疗可提供一种减少左心室和冠状动脉放射剂量的方法,从而降低该方法的心脏毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dosimetric advantages for cardiac substructures in radiotherapy of esophageal cancer in deep-inspiration breath hold.

Dosimetric advantages for cardiac substructures in radiotherapy of esophageal cancer in deep-inspiration breath hold.

Background: Radiotherapy is one of the main treatment options for patients with esophageal cancer; however, it has been linked with an increased risk of cardiac toxicities. In the current study, we evaluated the effect of planning the radiation in deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) on the dose sparing of cardiac substructures and lung.

Materials and methods: In this study, we analyzed 30 radiation therapy plans from 15 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer planned for neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Radiation plans were generated for 41.4 Gy and delivered in 1.8 Gy per fraction for free-breathing (FB) and DIBH techniques. We then conducted a comparative dosimetric analysis, evaluating target volume coverage, the impact on cardiac substructures, and lung doses across the two planning techniques for each patient.

Results: There was no significant disparity in target volume dose coverage between DIBH and FB plans. However, the Dmean, D2%, and V30% of the heart experienced substantial reductions in DIBH relative to FB, with values of 6.21 versus 7.02 Gy (p = 0.011), 35.28 versus 35.84 Gy (p = 0.047), and 5% versus 5.8% (p = 0.048), respectively. The Dmean of the left ventricle was notably lower in DIBH compared to FB (4.27 vs. 5.12 Gy, p = 0.0018), accompanied by significant improvements in V10. Additionally, the Dmean and D2% of the left coronary artery, as well as the D2% of the right coronary artery, were significantly lower in DIBH. The dosimetric impact of DIBH on cardiac substructures proved more advantageous for middle esophageal (ME) than distal esophageal (DE) tumors.

Conclusion: Radiotherapy in DIBH could provide a method to reduce the radiation dose to the left ventricle and coronaries, which could reduce the cardiac toxicity of the modality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.90%
发文量
141
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, published monthly, is a scientific journal that covers all aspects of oncology with focus on radiooncology, radiation biology and radiation physics. The articles are not only of interest to radiooncologists but to all physicians interested in oncology, to radiation biologists and radiation physicists. The journal publishes original articles, review articles and case studies that are peer-reviewed. It includes scientific short communications as well as a literature review with annotated articles that inform the reader on new developments in the various disciplines concerned and hence allow for a sound overview on the latest results in radiooncology research. Founded in 1912, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie is the oldest oncological journal in the world. Today, contributions are published in English and German. All articles have English summaries and legends. The journal is the official publication of several scientific radiooncological societies and publishes the relevant communications of these societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信