炎症性关节炎患者间质性肺病登记诊断的验证:来自 NOR-DMARD 研究的数据。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1080/03009742.2024.2306716
S A Provan, F Ahlfors, G Bakland, Y Hu, E K Kristianslund, E Ikdahl, T K Kvien, T M Aaløkken, A M Hoffmann-Vold
{"title":"炎症性关节炎患者间质性肺病登记诊断的验证:来自 NOR-DMARD 研究的数据。","authors":"S A Provan, F Ahlfors, G Bakland, Y Hu, E K Kristianslund, E Ikdahl, T K Kvien, T M Aaløkken, A M Hoffmann-Vold","doi":"10.1080/03009742.2024.2306716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a lack of knowledge concerning the validity of the interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnoses used in epidemiological studies on rheumatic diseases. This paper seeks to verify register-derived ILD diagnoses using chest computed tomography (CT) and medical records as a gold standard.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Norwegian Anti-Rheumatic Drug Register (NOR-DMARD) is a multicentre prospective observational study of patients with inflammatory arthritis who start treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. NOR-DMARD is linked to the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) and Cause of Death Registry. We searched registers for ILD coded by ICD-10 J84 or J99 among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or spondyloarthritis. We extracted chest CT reports and medical records from participating hospitals. Two expert thoracic radiologists scored examinations to confirm the ILD diagnosis. We also searched medical records to find justifications for the diagnosis following multidisciplinary evaluations. We calculated the positive predictive values (PPVs) for ILD across subsets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 71 cases with an ILD diagnosis. CT examinations were available in 65/71 patients (91.5%), of whom ILD was confirmed on CT in 29/65 (44.6%). In a further 10 patients, medical records confirmed the diagnosis, giving a total of 39/71 verified cases. The PPV of a register-derived ILD diagnosis was thus 54.9%. In a subset of patients who had received an ILD code at two or more time-points and had a CT scan taken within a relevant period, the PPV was 72.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The validity of register-based diagnoses of ILD must be carefully considered in epidemiological studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21424,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"173-179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A validation of register-derived diagnoses of interstitial lung disease in patients with inflammatory arthritis: data from the NOR-DMARD study.\",\"authors\":\"S A Provan, F Ahlfors, G Bakland, Y Hu, E K Kristianslund, E Ikdahl, T K Kvien, T M Aaløkken, A M Hoffmann-Vold\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03009742.2024.2306716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a lack of knowledge concerning the validity of the interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnoses used in epidemiological studies on rheumatic diseases. This paper seeks to verify register-derived ILD diagnoses using chest computed tomography (CT) and medical records as a gold standard.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Norwegian Anti-Rheumatic Drug Register (NOR-DMARD) is a multicentre prospective observational study of patients with inflammatory arthritis who start treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. NOR-DMARD is linked to the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) and Cause of Death Registry. We searched registers for ILD coded by ICD-10 J84 or J99 among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or spondyloarthritis. We extracted chest CT reports and medical records from participating hospitals. Two expert thoracic radiologists scored examinations to confirm the ILD diagnosis. We also searched medical records to find justifications for the diagnosis following multidisciplinary evaluations. We calculated the positive predictive values (PPVs) for ILD across subsets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 71 cases with an ILD diagnosis. CT examinations were available in 65/71 patients (91.5%), of whom ILD was confirmed on CT in 29/65 (44.6%). In a further 10 patients, medical records confirmed the diagnosis, giving a total of 39/71 verified cases. The PPV of a register-derived ILD diagnosis was thus 54.9%. In a subset of patients who had received an ILD code at two or more time-points and had a CT scan taken within a relevant period, the PPV was 72.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The validity of register-based diagnoses of ILD must be carefully considered in epidemiological studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"173-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2024.2306716\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2024.2306716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于风湿病流行病学研究中使用的间质性肺病(ILD)诊断的有效性还缺乏了解。本文试图以胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)和医疗记录作为金标准,验证登记册中的间质性肺病诊断:挪威抗风湿药物登记册(NOR-DMARD)是一项多中心前瞻性观察研究,研究对象是开始接受改变病情抗风湿药物治疗的炎症性关节炎患者。NOR-DMARD与挪威患者登记处(NPR)和死因登记处相连。我们在登记册中搜索了类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎或脊柱关节炎患者中以 ICD-10 J84 或 J99 编码的 ILD。我们提取了参与医院的胸部 CT 报告和医疗记录。两位胸部放射科专家对检查结果进行评分,以确认 ILD 诊断。我们还搜索了医疗记录,以寻找多学科评估后的诊断依据。我们计算了不同子集的 ILD 阳性预测值 (PPV):我们确定了 71 例诊断为 ILD 的病例。65/71 例患者(91.5%)接受了 CT 检查,其中 29/65 例患者(44.6%)通过 CT 确诊为 ILD。另有 10 名患者的病历证实了诊断结果,因此共有 39/71 例病例得到证实。因此,登记册得出的 ILD 诊断 PPV 为 54.9%。在两个或两个以上时间点获得 ILD 代码并在相关时间段内进行 CT 扫描的患者子集中,PPV 为 72.2%:结论:在流行病学研究中,必须仔细考虑基于登记的 ILD 诊断的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A validation of register-derived diagnoses of interstitial lung disease in patients with inflammatory arthritis: data from the NOR-DMARD study.

Objective: There is a lack of knowledge concerning the validity of the interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnoses used in epidemiological studies on rheumatic diseases. This paper seeks to verify register-derived ILD diagnoses using chest computed tomography (CT) and medical records as a gold standard.

Method: The Norwegian Anti-Rheumatic Drug Register (NOR-DMARD) is a multicentre prospective observational study of patients with inflammatory arthritis who start treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. NOR-DMARD is linked to the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) and Cause of Death Registry. We searched registers for ILD coded by ICD-10 J84 or J99 among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or spondyloarthritis. We extracted chest CT reports and medical records from participating hospitals. Two expert thoracic radiologists scored examinations to confirm the ILD diagnosis. We also searched medical records to find justifications for the diagnosis following multidisciplinary evaluations. We calculated the positive predictive values (PPVs) for ILD across subsets.

Results: We identified 71 cases with an ILD diagnosis. CT examinations were available in 65/71 patients (91.5%), of whom ILD was confirmed on CT in 29/65 (44.6%). In a further 10 patients, medical records confirmed the diagnosis, giving a total of 39/71 verified cases. The PPV of a register-derived ILD diagnosis was thus 54.9%. In a subset of patients who had received an ILD code at two or more time-points and had a CT scan taken within a relevant period, the PPV was 72.2%.

Conclusion: The validity of register-based diagnoses of ILD must be carefully considered in epidemiological studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology is the official journal of the Scandinavian Society for Rheumatology, a non-profit organization following the statutes of the Scandinavian Society for Rheumatology/Scandinavian Research Foundation. The main objective of the Foundation is to support research and promote information and knowledge about rheumatology and related fields. The annual surplus by running the Journal is awarded to young, talented, researchers within the field of rheumatology.pasting The Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology is an international scientific journal covering clinical and experimental aspects of rheumatic diseases. The journal provides essential reading for rheumatologists as well as general practitioners, orthopaedic surgeons, radiologists, pharmacologists, pathologists and other health professionals with an interest in patients with rheumatic diseases. The journal publishes original articles as well as reviews, editorials, letters and supplements within the various fields of clinical and experimental rheumatology, including; Epidemiology Aetiology and pathogenesis Treatment and prophylaxis Laboratory aspects including genetics, biochemistry, immunology, immunopathology, microbiology, histopathology, pathophysiology and pharmacology Radiological aspects including X-ray, ultrasonography, CT, MRI and other forms of imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信