社会性和母体大小对繁殖策略的影响:五种 Anelosimus(鹤形目,Theridiidae)在后代大小和数量之间的权衡。

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Gabriel M. Xavier, Rafael R. Moura, João Vasconcellos-Neto, Marcelo O. Gonzaga
{"title":"社会性和母体大小对繁殖策略的影响:五种 Anelosimus(鹤形目,Theridiidae)在后代大小和数量之间的权衡。","authors":"Gabriel M. Xavier,&nbsp;Rafael R. Moura,&nbsp;João Vasconcellos-Neto,&nbsp;Marcelo O. Gonzaga","doi":"10.1007/s00114-024-01895-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Individuals can experience accentuated disputes for resources when living with many conspecifics, even in situations in which cooperative behaviors assure benefits associated with an increase in the frequency of food acquisition and in diet breadth. Thus, intraspecific competition may exert a significant selective pressure on social animals. Theoretical models suggest that females of social species could improve their fitness by producing relatively large offspring, since body size can provide competitive advantages during foraging activities. As female reserves are limited, the production of large offspring would occur at the expense of their number. Using five <i>Anelosimus</i> (Araneae, Theridiidae) species, we assessed whether the social ones produce fewer and larger eggs than the subsocials. In addition, we tested the effect of female size on the adoption of each particular reproductive strategy. Small females could hypothetically invest in producing large offspring since they cannot produce as many offspring as large females. Our results suggested that, indeed, sociality influences reproductive strategies. Females of social species produced fewer and larger offspring than females of subsocial species. Subsociality, in turn, would benefit the production of many small spiderlings, possibly because a large number of siblings is important to maintain and expand new webs and to subdue prey during their initial instars. Our results also indicated that large females produce more eggs without necessarily reduce their sizes. We discussed how the costs and benefits of group living may influence reproductive strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":794,"journal":{"name":"The Science of Nature","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influences of sociality and maternal size on reproductive strategies: trade-offs between offspring size and quantity in five Anelosimus species (Araneae, Theridiidae)\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel M. Xavier,&nbsp;Rafael R. Moura,&nbsp;João Vasconcellos-Neto,&nbsp;Marcelo O. Gonzaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00114-024-01895-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Individuals can experience accentuated disputes for resources when living with many conspecifics, even in situations in which cooperative behaviors assure benefits associated with an increase in the frequency of food acquisition and in diet breadth. Thus, intraspecific competition may exert a significant selective pressure on social animals. Theoretical models suggest that females of social species could improve their fitness by producing relatively large offspring, since body size can provide competitive advantages during foraging activities. As female reserves are limited, the production of large offspring would occur at the expense of their number. Using five <i>Anelosimus</i> (Araneae, Theridiidae) species, we assessed whether the social ones produce fewer and larger eggs than the subsocials. In addition, we tested the effect of female size on the adoption of each particular reproductive strategy. Small females could hypothetically invest in producing large offspring since they cannot produce as many offspring as large females. Our results suggested that, indeed, sociality influences reproductive strategies. Females of social species produced fewer and larger offspring than females of subsocial species. Subsociality, in turn, would benefit the production of many small spiderlings, possibly because a large number of siblings is important to maintain and expand new webs and to subdue prey during their initial instars. Our results also indicated that large females produce more eggs without necessarily reduce their sizes. We discussed how the costs and benefits of group living may influence reproductive strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Science of Nature\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Science of Nature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00114-024-01895-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Science of Nature","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00114-024-01895-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当个体与许多同种动物生活在一起时,即使在合作行为能确保增加获取食物的频率和食物广度等相关利益的情况下,个体也会经历激烈的资源争夺。因此,种内竞争可能会对社会性动物产生巨大的选择压力。理论模型表明,社会性物种的雌性可以通过生产相对较大的后代来提高其适应能力,因为体型可以在觅食活动中提供竞争优势。由于雌性贮备有限,生产大型后代将以牺牲其数量为代价。我们利用五种 Anelosimus(鹤形目,Theridiidae)物种,评估了社会性物种是否比亚社会性物种产更少和更大的卵。此外,我们还测试了雌性个体大小对采用每种特定繁殖策略的影响。由于小雌性无法像大雌性那样生产大量后代,因此可以假设小雌性会投资生产大后代。我们的结果表明,社会性确实会影响繁殖策略。与亚社会性物种的雌性相比,社会性物种的雌性生产的后代数量更少、更大。亚社会性反过来会有利于生产许多小蜘蛛幼体,这可能是因为大量的兄弟姐妹对于维持和扩大新的蜘蛛网以及在幼体初生阶段制服猎物非常重要。我们的研究结果还表明,大型雌蛛会产下更多的卵,但不一定会减小卵的大小。我们讨论了群居生活的成本和收益如何影响繁殖策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influences of sociality and maternal size on reproductive strategies: trade-offs between offspring size and quantity in five Anelosimus species (Araneae, Theridiidae)

Individuals can experience accentuated disputes for resources when living with many conspecifics, even in situations in which cooperative behaviors assure benefits associated with an increase in the frequency of food acquisition and in diet breadth. Thus, intraspecific competition may exert a significant selective pressure on social animals. Theoretical models suggest that females of social species could improve their fitness by producing relatively large offspring, since body size can provide competitive advantages during foraging activities. As female reserves are limited, the production of large offspring would occur at the expense of their number. Using five Anelosimus (Araneae, Theridiidae) species, we assessed whether the social ones produce fewer and larger eggs than the subsocials. In addition, we tested the effect of female size on the adoption of each particular reproductive strategy. Small females could hypothetically invest in producing large offspring since they cannot produce as many offspring as large females. Our results suggested that, indeed, sociality influences reproductive strategies. Females of social species produced fewer and larger offspring than females of subsocial species. Subsociality, in turn, would benefit the production of many small spiderlings, possibly because a large number of siblings is important to maintain and expand new webs and to subdue prey during their initial instars. Our results also indicated that large females produce more eggs without necessarily reduce their sizes. We discussed how the costs and benefits of group living may influence reproductive strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Science of Nature
The Science of Nature 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Science of Nature - Naturwissenschaften - is Springer''s flagship multidisciplinary science journal. The journal is dedicated to the fast publication and global dissemination of high-quality research and invites papers, which are of interest to the broader community in the biological sciences. Contributions from the chemical, geological, and physical sciences are welcome if contributing to questions of general biological significance. Particularly welcomed are contributions that bridge between traditionally isolated areas and attempt to increase the conceptual understanding of systems and processes that demand an interdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信