{"title":"你爱我吗?并行词语处理会导致无法注意词语转换","authors":"Joshua Snell, Alline Nogueira Melo","doi":"10.5334/joc.335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent research has shown that readers may to fail notice word transpositions during reading (e.g., the transposition of \"fail\" and \"to\" in this sentence). Although this transposed word (TW) phenomenon was initially taken as evidence that readers process multiple words in parallel, several studies now show that TW-effects may also occur when words are presented one-by-one. Critically however, in the majority of studies TW-effects are weaker in serial presentation. Here we argue that while word position coding may to some extent proceed post-lexically (allowing TW-effects to occur despite seeing words one-by-one), stronger TW-effects in parallel presentation nonetheless evidence a degree of parallel word processing. We additionally report an experiment wherein a sample of Dutch participants (N = 34) made grammaticality judgments about 4-word TW sentences (e.g., '<i>the was man here</i>', '<i>the went dog away</i>') and ungrammatical control sentences ('<i>the man dog here</i>', '<i>the was went away</i>'), whereby the four words were presented either serially or in parallel. Ungrammaticality was decidedly more difficult to notice in the TW condition, but only when words were presented in parallel. No effects were observed in the serial presentation whatsoever. The present results bolster the notion that word order is encoded with a degree of flexibility, and further provide straightforward evidence for parallel word processing during reading.</p>","PeriodicalId":32728,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition","volume":"7 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10836188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Love You Me? Failure to Notice Word Transpositions is Induced by Parallel Word Processing.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Snell, Alline Nogueira Melo\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/joc.335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent research has shown that readers may to fail notice word transpositions during reading (e.g., the transposition of \\\"fail\\\" and \\\"to\\\" in this sentence). Although this transposed word (TW) phenomenon was initially taken as evidence that readers process multiple words in parallel, several studies now show that TW-effects may also occur when words are presented one-by-one. Critically however, in the majority of studies TW-effects are weaker in serial presentation. Here we argue that while word position coding may to some extent proceed post-lexically (allowing TW-effects to occur despite seeing words one-by-one), stronger TW-effects in parallel presentation nonetheless evidence a degree of parallel word processing. We additionally report an experiment wherein a sample of Dutch participants (N = 34) made grammaticality judgments about 4-word TW sentences (e.g., '<i>the was man here</i>', '<i>the went dog away</i>') and ungrammatical control sentences ('<i>the man dog here</i>', '<i>the was went away</i>'), whereby the four words were presented either serially or in parallel. Ungrammaticality was decidedly more difficult to notice in the TW condition, but only when words were presented in parallel. No effects were observed in the serial presentation whatsoever. The present results bolster the notion that word order is encoded with a degree of flexibility, and further provide straightforward evidence for parallel word processing during reading.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognition\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10836188/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近的研究表明,读者在阅读过程中可能无法注意到单词的转义(例如,本句中 "fail "和 "to "的转义)。虽然这种换词现象最初被认为是读者并行处理多个单词的证据,但现在的一些研究表明,当单词逐个出现时,也会产生换词效应。但重要的是,在大多数研究中,TW 效应在连续呈现时比较弱。在此,我们认为,虽然单词位置编码在某种程度上可能是在词汇后进行的(尽管单词是逐个出现的,但TW效应仍然会发生),但平行呈现时更强的TW效应仍然证明了一定程度的平行单词加工。我们还报告了一项实验,在该实验中,荷兰参与者(N=34)对 4 个单词的 TW 句子(如 "the was man here"("他在这里")、"the went dog away"("狗离开了"))和非语法对照句子("the man dog here"("他在这里")、"the was went away"("他离开了")进行语法判断,这 4 个单词是连续或平行呈现的。在 TW 条件下,不符合语法的句子明显更难被注意到,但只有在单词平行呈现时才会出现这种情况。而在串联呈现条件下,则没有观察到任何影响。本研究结果支持了词序编码具有一定灵活性的观点,并进一步为阅读过程中的平行词处理提供了直接证据。
Do Love You Me? Failure to Notice Word Transpositions is Induced by Parallel Word Processing.
Recent research has shown that readers may to fail notice word transpositions during reading (e.g., the transposition of "fail" and "to" in this sentence). Although this transposed word (TW) phenomenon was initially taken as evidence that readers process multiple words in parallel, several studies now show that TW-effects may also occur when words are presented one-by-one. Critically however, in the majority of studies TW-effects are weaker in serial presentation. Here we argue that while word position coding may to some extent proceed post-lexically (allowing TW-effects to occur despite seeing words one-by-one), stronger TW-effects in parallel presentation nonetheless evidence a degree of parallel word processing. We additionally report an experiment wherein a sample of Dutch participants (N = 34) made grammaticality judgments about 4-word TW sentences (e.g., 'the was man here', 'the went dog away') and ungrammatical control sentences ('the man dog here', 'the was went away'), whereby the four words were presented either serially or in parallel. Ungrammaticality was decidedly more difficult to notice in the TW condition, but only when words were presented in parallel. No effects were observed in the serial presentation whatsoever. The present results bolster the notion that word order is encoded with a degree of flexibility, and further provide straightforward evidence for parallel word processing during reading.