Sarah E. Maier, Thomas Nagel, Mustafa Turan, Elif Kaya, Wolfgang Frey, Michael Dyballa and Deven P. Estes*,
{"title":"带有膦酸盐锚定基团的表面固定化铜配合物在原子转移自由基环化和加成中的催化活性比较","authors":"Sarah E. Maier, Thomas Nagel, Mustafa Turan, Elif Kaya, Wolfgang Frey, Michael Dyballa and Deven P. Estes*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.organomet.3c00377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Covalent immobilization of molecular catalysts onto metal oxide surfaces through linker groups is a common strategy for heterogenizing homogeneous catalysts with the expectation that the immobilized catalyst will have properties similar to those of its molecular counterpart. However, the catalytic properties of the immobilized species are often quite different compared to their soluble counterparts in ways that are difficult to predict. This phenomenon is poorly understood and could be due to a variety of factors, including steric shielding of the complex by the surface, changes to the coordination sphere upon immobilization, or a lack of conformational flexibility of the immobilized complexes. Here, we tested the effect of surface immobilization on the catalytic activity and selectivity of atom transfer radical additions and cyclizations. In this study, we varied the proximity of the phosphonate anchoring group to the Cu center by attachment at varying positions of chelating nitrogen ligands such as 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), tris(pyridylmethyl)amine, and 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline as ligand scaffolds. Catalytic testing revealed that in cases where the anchoring group is remote from the catalytic center, as is the case for Cu(phen), the immobilized catalyst functions overall slightly better than its homogeneous counterpart (resulting in higher yields). However, for complexes in which the linker group is close to the active center, the catalytic performance of the immobilized complex was generally worse when immobilized than when in solution (decreased yield upon immobilization). Potential explanations of these observations are discussed. This study very clearly demonstrates the highly complex nature of immobilized catalysts and highlights the need for more in-depth comparisons between immobilized and soluble organometallic catalysts.</p>","PeriodicalId":56,"journal":{"name":"Organometallics","volume":"43 3","pages":"233–241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Catalytic Activity of Surface-Immobilized Copper Complexes with Phosphonate Anchoring Groups for Atom Transfer Radical Cyclizations and Additions\",\"authors\":\"Sarah E. Maier, Thomas Nagel, Mustafa Turan, Elif Kaya, Wolfgang Frey, Michael Dyballa and Deven P. Estes*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.organomet.3c00377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Covalent immobilization of molecular catalysts onto metal oxide surfaces through linker groups is a common strategy for heterogenizing homogeneous catalysts with the expectation that the immobilized catalyst will have properties similar to those of its molecular counterpart. However, the catalytic properties of the immobilized species are often quite different compared to their soluble counterparts in ways that are difficult to predict. This phenomenon is poorly understood and could be due to a variety of factors, including steric shielding of the complex by the surface, changes to the coordination sphere upon immobilization, or a lack of conformational flexibility of the immobilized complexes. Here, we tested the effect of surface immobilization on the catalytic activity and selectivity of atom transfer radical additions and cyclizations. In this study, we varied the proximity of the phosphonate anchoring group to the Cu center by attachment at varying positions of chelating nitrogen ligands such as 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), tris(pyridylmethyl)amine, and 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline as ligand scaffolds. Catalytic testing revealed that in cases where the anchoring group is remote from the catalytic center, as is the case for Cu(phen), the immobilized catalyst functions overall slightly better than its homogeneous counterpart (resulting in higher yields). However, for complexes in which the linker group is close to the active center, the catalytic performance of the immobilized complex was generally worse when immobilized than when in solution (decreased yield upon immobilization). Potential explanations of these observations are discussed. This study very clearly demonstrates the highly complex nature of immobilized catalysts and highlights the need for more in-depth comparisons between immobilized and soluble organometallic catalysts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organometallics\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"233–241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organometallics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.organomet.3c00377\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organometallics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.organomet.3c00377","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of the Catalytic Activity of Surface-Immobilized Copper Complexes with Phosphonate Anchoring Groups for Atom Transfer Radical Cyclizations and Additions
Covalent immobilization of molecular catalysts onto metal oxide surfaces through linker groups is a common strategy for heterogenizing homogeneous catalysts with the expectation that the immobilized catalyst will have properties similar to those of its molecular counterpart. However, the catalytic properties of the immobilized species are often quite different compared to their soluble counterparts in ways that are difficult to predict. This phenomenon is poorly understood and could be due to a variety of factors, including steric shielding of the complex by the surface, changes to the coordination sphere upon immobilization, or a lack of conformational flexibility of the immobilized complexes. Here, we tested the effect of surface immobilization on the catalytic activity and selectivity of atom transfer radical additions and cyclizations. In this study, we varied the proximity of the phosphonate anchoring group to the Cu center by attachment at varying positions of chelating nitrogen ligands such as 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), tris(pyridylmethyl)amine, and 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline as ligand scaffolds. Catalytic testing revealed that in cases where the anchoring group is remote from the catalytic center, as is the case for Cu(phen), the immobilized catalyst functions overall slightly better than its homogeneous counterpart (resulting in higher yields). However, for complexes in which the linker group is close to the active center, the catalytic performance of the immobilized complex was generally worse when immobilized than when in solution (decreased yield upon immobilization). Potential explanations of these observations are discussed. This study very clearly demonstrates the highly complex nature of immobilized catalysts and highlights the need for more in-depth comparisons between immobilized and soluble organometallic catalysts.
期刊介绍:
Organometallics is the flagship journal of organometallic chemistry and records progress in one of the most active fields of science, bridging organic and inorganic chemistry. The journal publishes Articles, Communications, Reviews, and Tutorials (instructional overviews) that depict research on the synthesis, structure, bonding, chemical reactivity, and reaction mechanisms for a variety of applications, including catalyst design and catalytic processes; main-group, transition-metal, and lanthanide and actinide metal chemistry; synthetic aspects of polymer science and materials science; and bioorganometallic chemistry.