问谁?测试住户调查中的受访者效应

IF 5.1 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Lise Masselus , Nathan Fiala
{"title":"问谁?测试住户调查中的受访者效应","authors":"Lise Masselus ,&nbsp;Nathan Fiala","doi":"10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Household questionnaires typically survey the most knowledgeable household member, but this can lead to inaccurate data if they have limited information. Using data from survey experiments with 4,100 households in Paraguay and Uganda, we investigate whether there are discrepancies in intra-household reporting when multiple household members are interviewed. We randomly vary who responds to a survey on household income and food consumption using common approaches to respondent selection. We find that the mean and distribution of these variables is insensitive to respondent selection. However, there are discrepancies between spouses of the same household in Uganda that depend on the gender of the respondent or recipient of the income. Taken together, our results indicate that respondent selection does not markedly affect the aggregate analysis of households, but that it may matter for obtaining accurate information on income and consumption for a given household or by gender.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387824000142/pdfft?md5=9adbd44ba3b0b77fd648b5495d3155ff&pid=1-s2.0-S0304387824000142-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whom to ask? Testing respondent effects in household surveys\",\"authors\":\"Lise Masselus ,&nbsp;Nathan Fiala\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Household questionnaires typically survey the most knowledgeable household member, but this can lead to inaccurate data if they have limited information. Using data from survey experiments with 4,100 households in Paraguay and Uganda, we investigate whether there are discrepancies in intra-household reporting when multiple household members are interviewed. We randomly vary who responds to a survey on household income and food consumption using common approaches to respondent selection. We find that the mean and distribution of these variables is insensitive to respondent selection. However, there are discrepancies between spouses of the same household in Uganda that depend on the gender of the respondent or recipient of the income. Taken together, our results indicate that respondent selection does not markedly affect the aggregate analysis of households, but that it may matter for obtaining accurate information on income and consumption for a given household or by gender.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Development Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387824000142/pdfft?md5=9adbd44ba3b0b77fd648b5495d3155ff&pid=1-s2.0-S0304387824000142-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Development Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387824000142\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387824000142","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

住户问卷通常会调查最了解情况的住户成员,但如果他们掌握的信息有限,就会导致数据不准确。我们利用巴拉圭和乌干达 4100 个家庭的调查实验数据,研究了多个家庭成员接受调查时,家庭内部报告是否存在差异。我们采用常见的受访者选择方法,随机改变家庭收入和食品消费调查的受访者。我们发现,这些变量的平均值和分布对受访者选择并不敏感。然而,乌干达同一家庭的配偶之间存在差异,这取决于受访者或收入接受者的性别。总之,我们的结果表明,受访者的选择并不会明显影响对家庭的总体分析,但对于获取特定家庭或不同性别的收入和消费的准确信息来说,选择可能很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whom to ask? Testing respondent effects in household surveys

Household questionnaires typically survey the most knowledgeable household member, but this can lead to inaccurate data if they have limited information. Using data from survey experiments with 4,100 households in Paraguay and Uganda, we investigate whether there are discrepancies in intra-household reporting when multiple household members are interviewed. We randomly vary who responds to a survey on household income and food consumption using common approaches to respondent selection. We find that the mean and distribution of these variables is insensitive to respondent selection. However, there are discrepancies between spouses of the same household in Uganda that depend on the gender of the respondent or recipient of the income. Taken together, our results indicate that respondent selection does not markedly affect the aggregate analysis of households, but that it may matter for obtaining accurate information on income and consumption for a given household or by gender.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
126
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Development Economics publishes papers relating to all aspects of economic development - from immediate policy concerns to structural problems of underdevelopment. The emphasis is on quantitative or analytical work, which is relevant as well as intellectually stimulating.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信