调查 TRICARE 受益人出生队列中脐带绕颈症发病率的短暂上升

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Jackielyn Lanning, Sandra Michelle Magallon, Anna T. Bukowinski, Gia R. Gumbs, Ava Marie S. Conlin, Clinton Hall
{"title":"调查 TRICARE 受益人出生队列中脐带绕颈症发病率的短暂上升","authors":"Jackielyn Lanning,&nbsp;Sandra Michelle Magallon,&nbsp;Anna T. Bukowinski,&nbsp;Gia R. Gumbs,&nbsp;Ava Marie S. Conlin,&nbsp;Clinton Hall","doi":"10.1002/bdr2.2305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Research (BIHR) program leverages medical encounter data to conduct birth defect surveillance among infants born to military families. Omphalocele is a major abdominal wall defect with an annual prevalence of ~2 per 10,000 births in BIHR data, but an unexpected increase was observed during 2017–2019, reaching 6.4 per 10,000 births in 2018. To investigate this transient increase in prevalence, this study aimed to validate the omphalocele case algorithm among infants born 2016–2021.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Omphalocele cases were identified by ICD-10 code Q79.2 (exomphalos) on one inpatient or two outpatient infant encounter records and validated using parental and infant electronic health records. Characteristics of true and false positive cases were assessed using bivariate analyses and compared over time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 638,905 live births from 2016 to 2021, 230 met the ICD-10 case definition for omphalocele; 138 (60.0%) cases were eligible for validation, of which 68 (49.3%) were true positives. The geometric mean time from birth to first ICD-10 omphalocele diagnosis was 1.1 (standard error [<i>SE</i>] 0.1) days for true positives and 11.9 (<i>SE</i> 3.1) days for false positives. Among the 70 false positives, 36 (51.4%) were cases of confirmed umbilical hernia; rates of umbilical hernia and delayed omphalocele diagnoses (&gt;30 days after birth) were elevated among false positives during 2017–2019.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Higher misuse of ICD-10 code Q79.2 during 2017–2019 likely influenced the associated increase in omphalocele prevalence. Timing of diagnosis should be considered for omphalocele case definitions using medical encounter data.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9121,"journal":{"name":"Birth Defects Research","volume":"116 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of a transient increase in omphalocele prevalence in a birth cohort of TRICARE beneficiaries\",\"authors\":\"Jackielyn Lanning,&nbsp;Sandra Michelle Magallon,&nbsp;Anna T. Bukowinski,&nbsp;Gia R. Gumbs,&nbsp;Ava Marie S. Conlin,&nbsp;Clinton Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bdr2.2305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Research (BIHR) program leverages medical encounter data to conduct birth defect surveillance among infants born to military families. Omphalocele is a major abdominal wall defect with an annual prevalence of ~2 per 10,000 births in BIHR data, but an unexpected increase was observed during 2017–2019, reaching 6.4 per 10,000 births in 2018. To investigate this transient increase in prevalence, this study aimed to validate the omphalocele case algorithm among infants born 2016–2021.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Omphalocele cases were identified by ICD-10 code Q79.2 (exomphalos) on one inpatient or two outpatient infant encounter records and validated using parental and infant electronic health records. Characteristics of true and false positive cases were assessed using bivariate analyses and compared over time.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 638,905 live births from 2016 to 2021, 230 met the ICD-10 case definition for omphalocele; 138 (60.0%) cases were eligible for validation, of which 68 (49.3%) were true positives. The geometric mean time from birth to first ICD-10 omphalocele diagnosis was 1.1 (standard error [<i>SE</i>] 0.1) days for true positives and 11.9 (<i>SE</i> 3.1) days for false positives. Among the 70 false positives, 36 (51.4%) were cases of confirmed umbilical hernia; rates of umbilical hernia and delayed omphalocele diagnoses (&gt;30 days after birth) were elevated among false positives during 2017–2019.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Higher misuse of ICD-10 code Q79.2 during 2017–2019 likely influenced the associated increase in omphalocele prevalence. Timing of diagnosis should be considered for omphalocele case definitions using medical encounter data.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Birth Defects Research\",\"volume\":\"116 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Birth Defects Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdr2.2305\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth Defects Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdr2.2305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 美国国防部出生和婴儿健康研究(BIHR)计划利用医疗会诊数据对军人家庭出生的婴儿进行出生缺陷监测。脐膨出是一种主要的腹壁缺陷,在 BIHR 数据中的年患病率约为每万名新生儿中 2 例,但在 2017-2019 年期间出现了意外增长,2018 年达到每万名新生儿中 6.4 例。为了调查这种患病率的短暂增长,本研究旨在验证 2016-2021 年出生婴儿中的脐膨出病例算法。 方法 根据一名住院患者或两名门诊患者的婴儿就诊记录中的 ICD-10 代码 Q79.2(颅外畸形)确定脐膨出病例,并使用父母和婴儿的电子健康记录进行验证。使用双变量分析评估了真阳性病例和假阳性病例的特征,并对不同时期的特征进行了比较。 结果 在2016年至2021年的638905例活产中,有230例符合ICD-10对卵脐病例的定义;138例(60.0%)符合验证条件,其中68例(49.3%)为真阳性。真阳性病例从出生到首次确诊 ICD-10 脑积水的几何平均时间为 1.1 天(标准误差 [SE] 0.1),假阳性病例为 11.9 天(标准误差 3.1)。在 70 例假阳性病例中,36 例(51.4%)为确诊脐疝;2017-2019 年期间,假阳性病例中脐疝和延迟脐疝诊断(>出生后 30 天)的比率升高。 结论 2017-2019年期间ICD-10代码Q79.2的误用率较高,可能影响了相关的脐疝患病率的增加。在使用医疗会诊数据进行脐膨出病例定义时应考虑诊断时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of a transient increase in omphalocele prevalence in a birth cohort of TRICARE beneficiaries

Background

The Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Research (BIHR) program leverages medical encounter data to conduct birth defect surveillance among infants born to military families. Omphalocele is a major abdominal wall defect with an annual prevalence of ~2 per 10,000 births in BIHR data, but an unexpected increase was observed during 2017–2019, reaching 6.4 per 10,000 births in 2018. To investigate this transient increase in prevalence, this study aimed to validate the omphalocele case algorithm among infants born 2016–2021.

Methods

Omphalocele cases were identified by ICD-10 code Q79.2 (exomphalos) on one inpatient or two outpatient infant encounter records and validated using parental and infant electronic health records. Characteristics of true and false positive cases were assessed using bivariate analyses and compared over time.

Results

Of 638,905 live births from 2016 to 2021, 230 met the ICD-10 case definition for omphalocele; 138 (60.0%) cases were eligible for validation, of which 68 (49.3%) were true positives. The geometric mean time from birth to first ICD-10 omphalocele diagnosis was 1.1 (standard error [SE] 0.1) days for true positives and 11.9 (SE 3.1) days for false positives. Among the 70 false positives, 36 (51.4%) were cases of confirmed umbilical hernia; rates of umbilical hernia and delayed omphalocele diagnoses (>30 days after birth) were elevated among false positives during 2017–2019.

Conclusions

Higher misuse of ICD-10 code Q79.2 during 2017–2019 likely influenced the associated increase in omphalocele prevalence. Timing of diagnosis should be considered for omphalocele case definitions using medical encounter data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Birth Defects Research
Birth Defects Research Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: The journal Birth Defects Research publishes original research and reviews in areas related to the etiology of adverse developmental and reproductive outcome. In particular the journal is devoted to the publication of original scientific research that contributes to the understanding of the biology of embryonic development and the prenatal causative factors and mechanisms leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes, namely structural and functional birth defects, pregnancy loss, postnatal functional defects in the human population, and to the identification of prenatal factors and biological mechanisms that reduce these risks. Adverse reproductive and developmental outcomes may have genetic, environmental, nutritional or epigenetic causes. Accordingly, the journal Birth Defects Research takes an integrated, multidisciplinary approach in its organization and publication strategy. The journal Birth Defects Research contains separate sections for clinical and molecular teratology, developmental and reproductive toxicology, and reviews in developmental biology to acknowledge and accommodate the integrative nature of research in this field. Each section has a dedicated editor who is a leader in his/her field and who has full editorial authority in his/her area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信