双重麻烦:揭示西门子 Atellica® - 总 PSA 和总 hCG 检测仪的两种钩状效应

IF 1.7 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Meryem Benamour , Pauline Brouwers , Arnaud Nevraumont, Tatiana Roy, Jean-Louis Bayart
{"title":"双重麻烦:揭示西门子 Atellica® - 总 PSA 和总 hCG 检测仪的两种钩状效应","authors":"Meryem Benamour ,&nbsp;Pauline Brouwers ,&nbsp;Arnaud Nevraumont,&nbsp;Tatiana Roy,&nbsp;Jean-Louis Bayart","doi":"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The “hook effect” or “prozone phenomenon” occurs when the concentration of a particular analyte saturates the antibodies used in the test, resulting in falsely low or negative results despite the presence of high analyte concentrations. We report two recent cases of hook effect encountered with a widely used immunoassay analyzer, the Siemens Atellica® IM1600. The first case involves a patient with advanced metastatic prostate cancer whose total PSA (tPSA) concentration dropped dramatically from his last biological control. The second case concerns a pregnant woman whose total HCG (ThCG) levels were also subject to the hook effect and who was found to have a molar pregnancy. In both cases, a dilution step enabled to overcome this analytical concern and to obtain a correct result. In addition, a comparison of the sensitivity of different immunoassay analyzers to this phenomenon was carried out. To avoid this analytical error, an additional dilution step should automatically be performed when there is a clinical suspicion of elevated levels of tumor or hormone markers. Finally, the most affected manufacturers should adapt their assays, accordingly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20421,"journal":{"name":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article e00366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235255172400012X/pdfft?md5=6861192cd5f0bc2bd10e0891cdb63103&pid=1-s2.0-S235255172400012X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double trouble: Unmasking two hook effects on Siemens Atellica® - Total PSA and total hCG assays\",\"authors\":\"Meryem Benamour ,&nbsp;Pauline Brouwers ,&nbsp;Arnaud Nevraumont,&nbsp;Tatiana Roy,&nbsp;Jean-Louis Bayart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The “hook effect” or “prozone phenomenon” occurs when the concentration of a particular analyte saturates the antibodies used in the test, resulting in falsely low or negative results despite the presence of high analyte concentrations. We report two recent cases of hook effect encountered with a widely used immunoassay analyzer, the Siemens Atellica® IM1600. The first case involves a patient with advanced metastatic prostate cancer whose total PSA (tPSA) concentration dropped dramatically from his last biological control. The second case concerns a pregnant woman whose total HCG (ThCG) levels were also subject to the hook effect and who was found to have a molar pregnancy. In both cases, a dilution step enabled to overcome this analytical concern and to obtain a correct result. In addition, a comparison of the sensitivity of different immunoassay analyzers to this phenomenon was carried out. To avoid this analytical error, an additional dilution step should automatically be performed when there is a clinical suspicion of elevated levels of tumor or hormone markers. Finally, the most affected manufacturers should adapt their assays, accordingly.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235255172400012X/pdfft?md5=6861192cd5f0bc2bd10e0891cdb63103&pid=1-s2.0-S235255172400012X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235255172400012X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235255172400012X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当特定分析物的浓度使检测中使用的抗体达到饱和时,就会出现 "钩状效应 "或 "原区现象",从而导致尽管分析物浓度很高,但检测结果却很低或呈阴性。我们报告了最近在西门子 Atellica® IM1600 免疫分析仪上遇到的两例钩状效应。第一个病例涉及一名晚期转移性前列腺癌患者,他的总 PSA(tPSA)浓度与上次生物控制相比急剧下降。第二个案例涉及一名孕妇,她的总 HCG(ThCG)水平也受到了钩状效应的影响,并被发现患有臼齿妊娠。在这两个案例中,稀释步骤都克服了这一分析问题,获得了正确的结果。此外,还比较了不同免疫测定分析仪对这一现象的灵敏度。为避免这种分析错误,当临床怀疑肿瘤或激素标记物水平升高时,应自动执行额外的稀释步骤。最后,受影响最大的生产商应相应调整其检测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Double trouble: Unmasking two hook effects on Siemens Atellica® - Total PSA and total hCG assays

The “hook effect” or “prozone phenomenon” occurs when the concentration of a particular analyte saturates the antibodies used in the test, resulting in falsely low or negative results despite the presence of high analyte concentrations. We report two recent cases of hook effect encountered with a widely used immunoassay analyzer, the Siemens Atellica® IM1600. The first case involves a patient with advanced metastatic prostate cancer whose total PSA (tPSA) concentration dropped dramatically from his last biological control. The second case concerns a pregnant woman whose total HCG (ThCG) levels were also subject to the hook effect and who was found to have a molar pregnancy. In both cases, a dilution step enabled to overcome this analytical concern and to obtain a correct result. In addition, a comparison of the sensitivity of different immunoassay analyzers to this phenomenon was carried out. To avoid this analytical error, an additional dilution step should automatically be performed when there is a clinical suspicion of elevated levels of tumor or hormone markers. Finally, the most affected manufacturers should adapt their assays, accordingly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Practical Laboratory Medicine Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical Laboratory Medicine is a high-quality, peer-reviewed, international open-access journal publishing original research, new methods and critical evaluations, case reports and short papers in the fields of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The objective of the journal is to provide practical information of immediate relevance to workers in clinical laboratories. The primary scope of the journal covers clinical chemistry, hematology, molecular biology and genetics relevant to laboratory medicine, microbiology, immunology, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory management and informatics. We welcome papers which describe critical evaluations of biomarkers and their role in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant disease, validation of commercial and in-house IVD methods, method comparisons, interference reports, the development of new reagents and reference materials, reference range studies and regulatory compliance reports. Manuscripts describing the development of new methods applicable to laboratory medicine (including point-of-care testing) are particularly encouraged, even if preliminary or small scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信