[非再灌注急性心肌梗死患者左心室收缩功能与冠状动脉侧支循环存在的相关性]。

Diego R Campos-Franco, Héctor González-Pacheco, Alexandra Arias-Mendoza
{"title":"[非再灌注急性心肌梗死患者左心室收缩功能与冠状动脉侧支循环存在的相关性]。","authors":"Diego R Campos-Franco, Héctor González-Pacheco, Alexandra Arias-Mendoza","doi":"10.24875/ACM.23000084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association between coronary collateral circulation and ventricular contractile function in patients with non-reperfused acute myocardial infarction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective and descriptive clinical study was conducted on patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at a reference cardiovascular center, from January 2006 to December 2022. Coronary angiographies and echocardiograms were reviewed to evaluate coronary collateral circulation and ventricular function, respectively. Patients were divided into groups based on the presence of collateral circulation. Both groups were compared and mortality during the index hospitalization was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of a total of 14,985 patients with acute coronary syndrome, 8134 (54.3%) had the diagnosis of STEMI. We excluded 12,880, leaving a total of 2105 non-reperfused STEMI patients who underwent coronary angiography, revealing lesions. There were more patients without collateral circulation: 1547 (73.5%) vs. 558 (26.5%) (p = 0.025). Patients without collateral circulation had a higher left ventricular ejection fraction (median of 47% vs. 42%; p < 0.001). Mortality in patients with collateral circulation was higher compared to those without it (11.6% vs. 9.8%; p = 0.225), but statistical significance was not reached.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-reperfused STEMI patients did not show protection from collateral circulation when assessing left ventricular systolic function. We did not find a difference in mortality compared to the population without development of collateral circulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93885,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","volume":" ","pages":"286-291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Correlation of left ventricular contractile function with the presence of collateral coronary circulation in non-reperfused acute myocardial infarction].\",\"authors\":\"Diego R Campos-Franco, Héctor González-Pacheco, Alexandra Arias-Mendoza\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/ACM.23000084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association between coronary collateral circulation and ventricular contractile function in patients with non-reperfused acute myocardial infarction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective and descriptive clinical study was conducted on patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at a reference cardiovascular center, from January 2006 to December 2022. Coronary angiographies and echocardiograms were reviewed to evaluate coronary collateral circulation and ventricular function, respectively. Patients were divided into groups based on the presence of collateral circulation. Both groups were compared and mortality during the index hospitalization was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of a total of 14,985 patients with acute coronary syndrome, 8134 (54.3%) had the diagnosis of STEMI. We excluded 12,880, leaving a total of 2105 non-reperfused STEMI patients who underwent coronary angiography, revealing lesions. There were more patients without collateral circulation: 1547 (73.5%) vs. 558 (26.5%) (p = 0.025). Patients without collateral circulation had a higher left ventricular ejection fraction (median of 47% vs. 42%; p < 0.001). Mortality in patients with collateral circulation was higher compared to those without it (11.6% vs. 9.8%; p = 0.225), but statistical significance was not reached.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-reperfused STEMI patients did not show protection from collateral circulation when assessing left ventricular systolic function. We did not find a difference in mortality compared to the population without development of collateral circulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"286-291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259427/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.23000084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.23000084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估非再灌注急性心肌梗死患者冠状动脉侧支循环与心室收缩功能之间的关系:方法:2006 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月,在一家心血管参考中心对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者进行了一项回顾性和描述性临床研究。研究人员审查了冠状动脉造影和超声心动图,以分别评估冠状动脉侧支循环和心室功能。根据是否存在侧支循环将患者分为两组。对两组患者进行比较,并对指数住院期间的死亡率进行分析:在总共 14985 名急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,有 8134 人(54.3%)被诊断为 STEMI。我们排除了 12880 名患者,剩下的 2105 名非再灌注 STEMI 患者接受了冠状动脉造影检查,发现了病变。没有侧支循环的患者更多:1547(73.5%)对 558(26.5%)(P = 0.025)。无侧支循环患者的左心室射血分数更高(中位数为 47% 对 42%;p < 0.001)。与无侧支循环的患者相比,有侧支循环的患者死亡率更高(11.6% vs. 9.8%;p = 0.225),但未达到统计学意义:结论:在评估左心室收缩功能时,未再灌注的 STEMI 患者并未显示出侧支循环的保护作用。与未出现侧支循环的人群相比,我们没有发现死亡率方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Correlation of left ventricular contractile function with the presence of collateral coronary circulation in non-reperfused acute myocardial infarction].

Objective: To assess the association between coronary collateral circulation and ventricular contractile function in patients with non-reperfused acute myocardial infarction.

Method: A retrospective and descriptive clinical study was conducted on patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at a reference cardiovascular center, from January 2006 to December 2022. Coronary angiographies and echocardiograms were reviewed to evaluate coronary collateral circulation and ventricular function, respectively. Patients were divided into groups based on the presence of collateral circulation. Both groups were compared and mortality during the index hospitalization was analyzed.

Results: Out of a total of 14,985 patients with acute coronary syndrome, 8134 (54.3%) had the diagnosis of STEMI. We excluded 12,880, leaving a total of 2105 non-reperfused STEMI patients who underwent coronary angiography, revealing lesions. There were more patients without collateral circulation: 1547 (73.5%) vs. 558 (26.5%) (p = 0.025). Patients without collateral circulation had a higher left ventricular ejection fraction (median of 47% vs. 42%; p < 0.001). Mortality in patients with collateral circulation was higher compared to those without it (11.6% vs. 9.8%; p = 0.225), but statistical significance was not reached.

Conclusions: Non-reperfused STEMI patients did not show protection from collateral circulation when assessing left ventricular systolic function. We did not find a difference in mortality compared to the population without development of collateral circulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信