选择性经皮关闭卵圆孔术后当天出院。

IF 1.1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Catarina Martins da Costa, Ana Filipa Amador, Roberto Pinto, Bruno Bragança, Inês Oliveira, João Carlos Silva, Rui André Rodrigues
{"title":"选择性经皮关闭卵圆孔术后当天出院。","authors":"Catarina Martins da Costa, Ana Filipa Amador, Roberto Pinto, Bruno Bragança, Inês Oliveira, João Carlos Silva, Rui André Rodrigues","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2024.2833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous closure of the patent foramen ovale (PFO) is increasingly performed in specific patients with cryptogenic stroke or clinical evidence of a paradoxical embolism. This study was performed to determine the safety of same-day discharge (SDD) following such procedures. This is a prospective, observational study of patients undergoing elective percutaneous PFO closure in a single tertiary center in Portugal between January 2020 and July 2023. AmplatzerTM devices (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) and NobblestichTM EL (HeartStitch, Inc., Fountain Valley, CA, USA) were used. After 6 months, the following events were looked at: post-procedural paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, stroke, unplanned cardiac re-hospitalization, urgent cardiac surgery, major vascular complications, pericardial effusions, device embolization, and death. We studied 122 consecutive patients (52% female, 68; 48±12 years old) who had elective percutaneous closure with success and no complications. Forty-nine (40%) had SDD. AmplatzerTM devices were used more frequently in the SDD group, while NobblestichTM EL was more common in the overnight group. During the overnight group's follow-up period, there was one non-cardiovascular death; there were no further events. SDD after elective percutaneous closure of PFO was shown to be a safe and successful patient management method, including NobblestichTM, which we describe for the first time. Our results prove the safety of this same-day discharge strategy. We hypothesize that in the near future, in selected cases, PFO closure might become an ambulatory procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Same-day discharge after elective percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale.\",\"authors\":\"Catarina Martins da Costa, Ana Filipa Amador, Roberto Pinto, Bruno Bragança, Inês Oliveira, João Carlos Silva, Rui André Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/monaldi.2024.2833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Percutaneous closure of the patent foramen ovale (PFO) is increasingly performed in specific patients with cryptogenic stroke or clinical evidence of a paradoxical embolism. This study was performed to determine the safety of same-day discharge (SDD) following such procedures. This is a prospective, observational study of patients undergoing elective percutaneous PFO closure in a single tertiary center in Portugal between January 2020 and July 2023. AmplatzerTM devices (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) and NobblestichTM EL (HeartStitch, Inc., Fountain Valley, CA, USA) were used. After 6 months, the following events were looked at: post-procedural paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, stroke, unplanned cardiac re-hospitalization, urgent cardiac surgery, major vascular complications, pericardial effusions, device embolization, and death. We studied 122 consecutive patients (52% female, 68; 48±12 years old) who had elective percutaneous closure with success and no complications. Forty-nine (40%) had SDD. AmplatzerTM devices were used more frequently in the SDD group, while NobblestichTM EL was more common in the overnight group. During the overnight group's follow-up period, there was one non-cardiovascular death; there were no further events. SDD after elective percutaneous closure of PFO was shown to be a safe and successful patient management method, including NobblestichTM, which we describe for the first time. Our results prove the safety of this same-day discharge strategy. We hypothesize that in the near future, in selected cases, PFO closure might become an ambulatory procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2024.2833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2024.2833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经皮闭合卵圆孔(PFO)越来越多地应用于隐源性中风或有临床证据表明存在矛盾性栓塞的特定患者。本研究旨在确定此类手术后当天出院 (SDD) 的安全性。这是一项前瞻性观察研究,研究对象是 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月期间在葡萄牙一家三级医疗中心接受择期经皮 PFO 关闭术的患者。使用了 AmplatzerTM 设备(St. Jude Medical,St. Paul,MN,USA)和 NobblestichTM EL(HeartStitch, Inc.,Fountain Valley,CA,USA)。6 个月后,我们对以下事件进行了调查:术后阵发性房颤、中风、非计划性心脏再住院、紧急心脏手术、主要血管并发症、心包积液、器械栓塞和死亡。我们连续研究了 122 例(52% 为女性,68 例;48±12 岁)选择性经皮封堵术成功且无并发症的患者。其中49人(40%)患有SDD。在 SDD 组中,AmplatzerTM 装置的使用率更高,而在隔夜组中,NobblestichTM EL 的使用率更高。在隔夜组的随访期间,有一例非心血管疾病死亡,没有其他事件发生。选择性经皮封堵 PFO 后进行 SDD 被证明是一种安全、成功的患者管理方法,包括我们首次描述的 NobblestichTM。我们的结果证明了这种当天出院策略的安全性。我们假设,在不久的将来,在选定的病例中,PFO 关闭术可能会成为一种非住院手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Same-day discharge after elective percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale.

Percutaneous closure of the patent foramen ovale (PFO) is increasingly performed in specific patients with cryptogenic stroke or clinical evidence of a paradoxical embolism. This study was performed to determine the safety of same-day discharge (SDD) following such procedures. This is a prospective, observational study of patients undergoing elective percutaneous PFO closure in a single tertiary center in Portugal between January 2020 and July 2023. AmplatzerTM devices (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) and NobblestichTM EL (HeartStitch, Inc., Fountain Valley, CA, USA) were used. After 6 months, the following events were looked at: post-procedural paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, stroke, unplanned cardiac re-hospitalization, urgent cardiac surgery, major vascular complications, pericardial effusions, device embolization, and death. We studied 122 consecutive patients (52% female, 68; 48±12 years old) who had elective percutaneous closure with success and no complications. Forty-nine (40%) had SDD. AmplatzerTM devices were used more frequently in the SDD group, while NobblestichTM EL was more common in the overnight group. During the overnight group's follow-up period, there was one non-cardiovascular death; there were no further events. SDD after elective percutaneous closure of PFO was shown to be a safe and successful patient management method, including NobblestichTM, which we describe for the first time. Our results prove the safety of this same-day discharge strategy. We hypothesize that in the near future, in selected cases, PFO closure might become an ambulatory procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信