{"title":"个性化顺势疗法药物治疗痔疮的疗效:双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。","authors":"Munmun Koley, Vinod Kumar Vimal, Arvind Kumar Verma, Shiv Shanker Pal, Dileep Kumar Sonkar, Smita Vimal, Om Prakash Singh, Shubhamoy Ghosh, Subhranil Saha","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To investigate the efficacy and safety of individualized homeopathic medicines (IHMs) in treating hemorrhoids compared with placebo. <b><i>Design:</i></b> This is a double-blind, randomized (1:1), two parallel arms, placebo-controlled trial. <b><i>Setting:</i></b> The trial was conducted at the surgery outpatient department of the State National Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. <b><i>Subjects:</i></b> Patients were 140 women and men, aged between 18 and 65 years, with a diagnosis of primary hemorrhoids grades I-III for at least 3 months. Excluded were the patients with grade IV hemorrhoids, anal fissure, and fistula, hypertrophic anal papillae, inflammatory bowel disease, coagulation disorders, rectal malignancies, obstructed portal circulation, patients requiring immediate surgical intervention, and vulnerable samples. <b><i>Interventions:</i></b> Patients were randomized to Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 70; IHMs plus concomitant care; verum) and Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 70; placebos plus concomitant care; control). <b><i>Outcome measures:</i></b> Primary-the anorectal symptom severity and quality-of-life (ARSSQoL) questionnaire, and secondary-the EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS); all of them were measured at baseline, and every month, up to 3 months. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Out of the 140 randomized patients, 122 were protocol compliant. Intention-to-treat sample (<i>n</i> = 140) was analyzed. The level of significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05 two tailed. Statistically significant between-group differences were elicited in the ARSSQoL total (Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> [MWU]: 1227.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (MWU: 1228.0, <i>p</i> = 0.001) favoring homeopathy against placebos. <i>Sulfur</i> was the most frequently prescribed medicine. No harm or serious adverse events were reported from either of the groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> IHMs demonstrated superior results over placebo in the short-term treatment of hemorrhoids of grades I-III. The findings are promising, but need to be substantiated by further phase 3 trials. Clinical Trial Registration Number: CTRI/2020/03/024342.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"783-792"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Medicines in the Treatment of Hemorrhoids: Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Munmun Koley, Vinod Kumar Vimal, Arvind Kumar Verma, Shiv Shanker Pal, Dileep Kumar Sonkar, Smita Vimal, Om Prakash Singh, Shubhamoy Ghosh, Subhranil Saha\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jicm.2023.0228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To investigate the efficacy and safety of individualized homeopathic medicines (IHMs) in treating hemorrhoids compared with placebo. <b><i>Design:</i></b> This is a double-blind, randomized (1:1), two parallel arms, placebo-controlled trial. <b><i>Setting:</i></b> The trial was conducted at the surgery outpatient department of the State National Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. <b><i>Subjects:</i></b> Patients were 140 women and men, aged between 18 and 65 years, with a diagnosis of primary hemorrhoids grades I-III for at least 3 months. Excluded were the patients with grade IV hemorrhoids, anal fissure, and fistula, hypertrophic anal papillae, inflammatory bowel disease, coagulation disorders, rectal malignancies, obstructed portal circulation, patients requiring immediate surgical intervention, and vulnerable samples. <b><i>Interventions:</i></b> Patients were randomized to Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 70; IHMs plus concomitant care; verum) and Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 70; placebos plus concomitant care; control). <b><i>Outcome measures:</i></b> Primary-the anorectal symptom severity and quality-of-life (ARSSQoL) questionnaire, and secondary-the EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS); all of them were measured at baseline, and every month, up to 3 months. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Out of the 140 randomized patients, 122 were protocol compliant. Intention-to-treat sample (<i>n</i> = 140) was analyzed. The level of significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05 two tailed. Statistically significant between-group differences were elicited in the ARSSQoL total (Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> [MWU]: 1227.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (MWU: 1228.0, <i>p</i> = 0.001) favoring homeopathy against placebos. <i>Sulfur</i> was the most frequently prescribed medicine. No harm or serious adverse events were reported from either of the groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> IHMs demonstrated superior results over placebo in the short-term treatment of hemorrhoids of grades I-III. The findings are promising, but need to be substantiated by further phase 3 trials. Clinical Trial Registration Number: CTRI/2020/03/024342.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"783-792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2023.0228\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2023.0228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的与安慰剂相比,研究个体化顺势疗法药物(IHMs)治疗痔疮的有效性和安全性。设计:这是一项双盲、随机(1:1)、双臂平行、安慰剂对照试验。试验地点试验在印度北方邦勒克瑙国立同种疗法医学院和医院外科门诊部进行。受试者患者为 140 名女性和男性,年龄在 18 岁至 65 岁之间,诊断为 I-III 级原发性痔疮至少 3 个月。不包括 IV 级痔疮、肛裂、肛瘘、肥大性肛乳头、炎症性肠病、凝血障碍、直肠恶性肿瘤、门静脉循环受阻、需要立即手术治疗的患者以及易受感染的样本。干预:患者随机分为第 1 组(n = 70;IHMs 加辅助护理;verum)和第 2 组(n = 70;安慰剂加辅助护理;对照组)。结果测量:主要测量肛门直肠症状严重程度和生活质量(ARSSQoL)问卷,次要测量欧洲肛门直肠症状5维5级(EQ-5D-5L)问卷和EQ视觉模拟量表(VAS);所有测量均在基线时进行,并在3个月内每月测量一次。结果在 140 名随机患者中,122 人符合治疗方案。对意向治疗样本(n = 140)进行了分析。显著性水平设定为 p U [MWU]:1227.0, p p = 0.001),顺势疗法优于安慰剂。硫磺是最常用的处方药。两组患者均未出现任何伤害或严重不良反应。结论在短期治疗 I-III 级痔疮方面,IHMs 的疗效优于安慰剂。研究结果很有希望,但还需要进一步的三期试验来证实。临床试验注册号CTRI/2020/03/024342.
Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Medicines in the Treatment of Hemorrhoids: Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of individualized homeopathic medicines (IHMs) in treating hemorrhoids compared with placebo. Design: This is a double-blind, randomized (1:1), two parallel arms, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: The trial was conducted at the surgery outpatient department of the State National Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. Subjects: Patients were 140 women and men, aged between 18 and 65 years, with a diagnosis of primary hemorrhoids grades I-III for at least 3 months. Excluded were the patients with grade IV hemorrhoids, anal fissure, and fistula, hypertrophic anal papillae, inflammatory bowel disease, coagulation disorders, rectal malignancies, obstructed portal circulation, patients requiring immediate surgical intervention, and vulnerable samples. Interventions: Patients were randomized to Group 1 (n = 70; IHMs plus concomitant care; verum) and Group 2 (n = 70; placebos plus concomitant care; control). Outcome measures: Primary-the anorectal symptom severity and quality-of-life (ARSSQoL) questionnaire, and secondary-the EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS); all of them were measured at baseline, and every month, up to 3 months. Results: Out of the 140 randomized patients, 122 were protocol compliant. Intention-to-treat sample (n = 140) was analyzed. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05 two tailed. Statistically significant between-group differences were elicited in the ARSSQoL total (Mann-Whitney U [MWU]: 1227.0, p < 0.001) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (MWU: 1228.0, p = 0.001) favoring homeopathy against placebos. Sulfur was the most frequently prescribed medicine. No harm or serious adverse events were reported from either of the groups. Conclusions: IHMs demonstrated superior results over placebo in the short-term treatment of hemorrhoids of grades I-III. The findings are promising, but need to be substantiated by further phase 3 trials. Clinical Trial Registration Number: CTRI/2020/03/024342.