YouTube 上关于头骨解剖的视频对学生有用吗?

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Clinical Anatomy Pub Date : 2024-02-03 DOI:10.1002/ca.24138
Songul Cuglan, Selin Gas
{"title":"YouTube 上关于头骨解剖的视频对学生有用吗?","authors":"Songul Cuglan,&nbsp;Selin Gas","doi":"10.1002/ca.24138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the content, quality, and functionality of YouTube videos on the anatomy of skull bones and to measure their educational usefulness. In this cross-sectional study, the keywords “skull bones” and “skull anatomy” were searched in the YouTube search tab. Demographic data such as type, source, duration, upload date, and view rates of the videos were recorded. The quality and content of the videos were measured using the total content score (TCS), modified DISCERN scale, JAMA score, and Global Quality Scale (GQS). SPSS 26.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Twenty-five (34.7%) of the first 72 videos found by keyword searches were included in the study. According to the GQS criteria, six of them (24%) were considered useful and 19 (76%) not useful. There was a strong statistically significant correlation between the GQS and DISCERN scores (<i>r</i> = 0.813, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There were strong statistically significant positive correlations between TCS and GQS scores (<i>r</i> = 0.887, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and between TCS and modified DISCERN scores (<i>r</i> = 0.691, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Additionally, there was a moderately strong statistically significant positive correlation between GQS and JAMA scores (<i>r</i> = 0.507, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). There were also moderately strong statistically significant correlations between JAMA score and DISCERN score (<i>r</i> = 0.521, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), video length (<i>r</i> = 0.416, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), number of comments (<i>r</i> = 0.457, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), and number of “likes” (<i>r</i> = 0.608, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There was a moderately strong statistically significant positive correlation between TCS and JAMA scores (<i>r</i> = 0.431, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Most YouTube videos have insufficient information about skull bones to meet the expectations of medical and dental school curricula. Anatomists and institutions should be encouraged to prepare and present YouTube videos using assessment systems such as DISCERN, JAMA, GQS, and TCS, in line with current anatomy curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are YouTube videos about skull bone anatomy useful for students?\",\"authors\":\"Songul Cuglan,&nbsp;Selin Gas\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ca.24138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the content, quality, and functionality of YouTube videos on the anatomy of skull bones and to measure their educational usefulness. In this cross-sectional study, the keywords “skull bones” and “skull anatomy” were searched in the YouTube search tab. Demographic data such as type, source, duration, upload date, and view rates of the videos were recorded. The quality and content of the videos were measured using the total content score (TCS), modified DISCERN scale, JAMA score, and Global Quality Scale (GQS). SPSS 26.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Twenty-five (34.7%) of the first 72 videos found by keyword searches were included in the study. According to the GQS criteria, six of them (24%) were considered useful and 19 (76%) not useful. There was a strong statistically significant correlation between the GQS and DISCERN scores (<i>r</i> = 0.813, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There were strong statistically significant positive correlations between TCS and GQS scores (<i>r</i> = 0.887, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and between TCS and modified DISCERN scores (<i>r</i> = 0.691, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Additionally, there was a moderately strong statistically significant positive correlation between GQS and JAMA scores (<i>r</i> = 0.507, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). There were also moderately strong statistically significant correlations between JAMA score and DISCERN score (<i>r</i> = 0.521, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), video length (<i>r</i> = 0.416, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), number of comments (<i>r</i> = 0.457, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), and number of “likes” (<i>r</i> = 0.608, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There was a moderately strong statistically significant positive correlation between TCS and JAMA scores (<i>r</i> = 0.431, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Most YouTube videos have insufficient information about skull bones to meet the expectations of medical and dental school curricula. Anatomists and institutions should be encouraged to prepare and present YouTube videos using assessment systems such as DISCERN, JAMA, GQS, and TCS, in line with current anatomy curricula.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Anatomy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Anatomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ca.24138\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ca.24138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估YouTube上有关头颅骨解剖的视频的内容、质量和功能,并衡量其教育实用性。在这项横向研究中,我们在 YouTube 搜索标签中搜索了关键词 "颅骨 "和 "颅骨解剖"。记录了视频的类型、来源、持续时间、上传日期和观看率等人口统计学数据。视频的质量和内容采用内容总分(TCS)、修改后的 DISCERN 量表、JAMA 量表和全球质量量表(GQS)进行衡量。统计分析采用 SPSS 26.0 软件。在通过关键词搜索找到的前 72 个视频中,有 25 个(34.7%)被纳入研究范围。根据 GQS 标准,其中 6 个(24%)被认为有用,19 个(76%)被认为无用。GQS 和 DISCERN 分数之间存在统计学意义上的显著相关性(r = 0.813,p < 0.001)。TCS 和 GQS 分数之间(r = 0.887,p <0.001)以及 TCS 和修改后的 DISCERN 分数之间(r = 0.691,p <0.001)存在统计学意义上的强正相关。此外,GQS 和 JAMA 分数之间存在中度统计学意义的正相关(r = 0.507,p < 0.05)。JAMA 分数与 DISCERN 分数(r = 0.521,p < 0.001)、视频长度(r = 0.416,p < 0.05)、评论数量(r = 0.457,p < 0.05)和 "喜欢 "数量(r = 0.608,p < 0.001)之间也存在中等强度的统计意义上的相关性。TCS 和 JAMA 分数之间存在中度统计学意义的正相关(r = 0.431,p < 0.05)。大多数 YouTube 视频中有关头颅骨的信息不足以满足医学院和牙医学院课程的要求。应鼓励解剖学家和机构根据当前的解剖课程,使用 DISCERN、JAMA、GQS 和 TCS 等评估系统准备和展示 YouTube 视频。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are YouTube videos about skull bone anatomy useful for students?

The aim of this study was to evaluate the content, quality, and functionality of YouTube videos on the anatomy of skull bones and to measure their educational usefulness. In this cross-sectional study, the keywords “skull bones” and “skull anatomy” were searched in the YouTube search tab. Demographic data such as type, source, duration, upload date, and view rates of the videos were recorded. The quality and content of the videos were measured using the total content score (TCS), modified DISCERN scale, JAMA score, and Global Quality Scale (GQS). SPSS 26.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Twenty-five (34.7%) of the first 72 videos found by keyword searches were included in the study. According to the GQS criteria, six of them (24%) were considered useful and 19 (76%) not useful. There was a strong statistically significant correlation between the GQS and DISCERN scores (r = 0.813, p < 0.001). There were strong statistically significant positive correlations between TCS and GQS scores (r = 0.887, p < 0.001) and between TCS and modified DISCERN scores (r = 0.691, p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a moderately strong statistically significant positive correlation between GQS and JAMA scores (r = 0.507, p < 0.05). There were also moderately strong statistically significant correlations between JAMA score and DISCERN score (r = 0.521, p < 0.001), video length (r = 0.416, p < 0.05), number of comments (r = 0.457, p < 0.05), and number of “likes” (r = 0.608, p < 0.001). There was a moderately strong statistically significant positive correlation between TCS and JAMA scores (r = 0.431, p < 0.05). Most YouTube videos have insufficient information about skull bones to meet the expectations of medical and dental school curricula. Anatomists and institutions should be encouraged to prepare and present YouTube videos using assessment systems such as DISCERN, JAMA, GQS, and TCS, in line with current anatomy curricula.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Anatomy
Clinical Anatomy 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Anatomy is the Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists. The goal of Clinical Anatomy is to provide a medium for the exchange of current information between anatomists and clinicians. This journal embraces anatomy in all its aspects as applied to medical practice. Furthermore, the journal assists physicians and other health care providers in keeping abreast of new methodologies for patient management and informs educators of new developments in clinical anatomy and teaching techniques. Clinical Anatomy publishes original and review articles of scientific, clinical, and educational interest. Papers covering the application of anatomic principles to the solution of clinical problems and/or the application of clinical observations to expand anatomic knowledge are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信