利用神经网络纠正风暴潮实况预报的偏差

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Paulina Tedesco , Jean Rabault , Martin Lilleeng Sætra , Nils Melsom Kristensen , Ole Johan Aarnes , Øyvind Breivik , Cecilie Mauritzen , Øyvind Sætra
{"title":"利用神经网络纠正风暴潮实况预报的偏差","authors":"Paulina Tedesco ,&nbsp;Jean Rabault ,&nbsp;Martin Lilleeng Sætra ,&nbsp;Nils Melsom Kristensen ,&nbsp;Ole Johan Aarnes ,&nbsp;Øyvind Breivik ,&nbsp;Cecilie Mauritzen ,&nbsp;Øyvind Sætra","doi":"10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Storm surges can give rise to extreme floods in coastal areas. The Norwegian Meteorological Institute (MET Norway) produces 120 h regional operational storm surge forecasts along the coast of Norway based on the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS), using a model setup called Nordic4-SS. Despite advances in the development of models and computational capabilities, forecast errors remain large enough to impact response measures and issued alerts, in particular, during the strongest storm events. Reducing these errors will positively impact the efficiency of the warning systems while minimizing efforts and resources. Here, we investigate how forecasts can be improved with residual learning, i.e., training data-driven models to predict the residuals in forecasts from Nordic4-SS. A simple error mapping technique and a more sophisticated Neural Network (NN) method are tested. The simple error mapping technique provides a reduction in the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of less than 4%. Using the NN residual correction method, the RMSE in the Oslo Fjord is reduced by 36% for lead times of one hour, 9% for 24 h, and 5% for 60 h. Therefore, the residual NN method is a promising direction for correcting storm surge forecasts, especially on short timescales. Moreover, it is well adapted to being deployed operationally, as (i) the correction is applied on top of the existing model and requires no changes to it, (ii) all predictors used for NN inference are already available operationally, (iii) prediction by the NNs is very fast, typically a few seconds per station, and (iv) the NN correction can be provided to a human expert who may inspect it, compare it with the model output, and see how much correction is brought by the NN, allowing to capitalize on human expertise as a quality validation of the NN output. While no changes to the hydrodynamic model are necessary to calibrate the neural networks, they are specific to a given model and must be recalibrated when the numerical models are updated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19457,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Modelling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500324000210/pdfft?md5=b0ab973331947601607087f776961d9d&pid=1-s2.0-S1463500324000210-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bias correction of operational storm surge forecasts using Neural Networks\",\"authors\":\"Paulina Tedesco ,&nbsp;Jean Rabault ,&nbsp;Martin Lilleeng Sætra ,&nbsp;Nils Melsom Kristensen ,&nbsp;Ole Johan Aarnes ,&nbsp;Øyvind Breivik ,&nbsp;Cecilie Mauritzen ,&nbsp;Øyvind Sætra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Storm surges can give rise to extreme floods in coastal areas. The Norwegian Meteorological Institute (MET Norway) produces 120 h regional operational storm surge forecasts along the coast of Norway based on the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS), using a model setup called Nordic4-SS. Despite advances in the development of models and computational capabilities, forecast errors remain large enough to impact response measures and issued alerts, in particular, during the strongest storm events. Reducing these errors will positively impact the efficiency of the warning systems while minimizing efforts and resources. Here, we investigate how forecasts can be improved with residual learning, i.e., training data-driven models to predict the residuals in forecasts from Nordic4-SS. A simple error mapping technique and a more sophisticated Neural Network (NN) method are tested. The simple error mapping technique provides a reduction in the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of less than 4%. Using the NN residual correction method, the RMSE in the Oslo Fjord is reduced by 36% for lead times of one hour, 9% for 24 h, and 5% for 60 h. Therefore, the residual NN method is a promising direction for correcting storm surge forecasts, especially on short timescales. Moreover, it is well adapted to being deployed operationally, as (i) the correction is applied on top of the existing model and requires no changes to it, (ii) all predictors used for NN inference are already available operationally, (iii) prediction by the NNs is very fast, typically a few seconds per station, and (iv) the NN correction can be provided to a human expert who may inspect it, compare it with the model output, and see how much correction is brought by the NN, allowing to capitalize on human expertise as a quality validation of the NN output. While no changes to the hydrodynamic model are necessary to calibrate the neural networks, they are specific to a given model and must be recalibrated when the numerical models are updated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean Modelling\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500324000210/pdfft?md5=b0ab973331947601607087f776961d9d&pid=1-s2.0-S1463500324000210-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500324000210\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500324000210","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

风暴潮可导致沿海地区发生特大洪水。挪威气象研究所(MET Norway)根据区域海洋模拟系统(ROMS),利用名为 Nordic4-SS 的模型设置,对挪威沿海地区进行 120 小时的区域风暴潮业务预报。尽管在开发模型和计算能力方面取得了进展,但预报误差仍然很大,足以影响应对措施和发布警报,特别是在最强烈的风暴事件期间。减少这些误差将对预警系统的效率产生积极影响,同时最大限度地减少用于减灾的努力和资源。在此,我们研究了如何通过残差学习(即训练数据驱动模型来预测 Nordic4-SS 预报中的残差)来改进预报。我们测试了一种简单的误差映射技术和一种更复杂的神经网络(NN)方法。简单的误差映射技术可将均方根误差 (RMSE) 降低到 4% 以下。因此,残差 NN 方法是修正风暴潮预报的一个很有前途的方向,尤其是在短时尺度上。此外,该方法非常适合实际应用,因为:(i) 修正是在现有模型的基础上进行的,无需对其进行任何改动;(ii) 用于 NN 推理的所有预测因子都已在实际应用中可用;(iii) NN 的预测速度非常快,通常每个站点只需几秒钟;(iv) NN 修正结果可以提供给人类专家,他们可以对其进行检查,将其与模型输出结果进行比较,并查看 NN 带来的修正程度,从而利用人类专家的专业知识对 NN 输出结果进行质量验证。虽然校准神经网络不需要更改流体力学模型,但神经网络是特定模型所特有的,必须在数值模型更新时重新校准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bias correction of operational storm surge forecasts using Neural Networks

Storm surges can give rise to extreme floods in coastal areas. The Norwegian Meteorological Institute (MET Norway) produces 120 h regional operational storm surge forecasts along the coast of Norway based on the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS), using a model setup called Nordic4-SS. Despite advances in the development of models and computational capabilities, forecast errors remain large enough to impact response measures and issued alerts, in particular, during the strongest storm events. Reducing these errors will positively impact the efficiency of the warning systems while minimizing efforts and resources. Here, we investigate how forecasts can be improved with residual learning, i.e., training data-driven models to predict the residuals in forecasts from Nordic4-SS. A simple error mapping technique and a more sophisticated Neural Network (NN) method are tested. The simple error mapping technique provides a reduction in the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of less than 4%. Using the NN residual correction method, the RMSE in the Oslo Fjord is reduced by 36% for lead times of one hour, 9% for 24 h, and 5% for 60 h. Therefore, the residual NN method is a promising direction for correcting storm surge forecasts, especially on short timescales. Moreover, it is well adapted to being deployed operationally, as (i) the correction is applied on top of the existing model and requires no changes to it, (ii) all predictors used for NN inference are already available operationally, (iii) prediction by the NNs is very fast, typically a few seconds per station, and (iv) the NN correction can be provided to a human expert who may inspect it, compare it with the model output, and see how much correction is brought by the NN, allowing to capitalize on human expertise as a quality validation of the NN output. While no changes to the hydrodynamic model are necessary to calibrate the neural networks, they are specific to a given model and must be recalibrated when the numerical models are updated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean Modelling
Ocean Modelling 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
19.6 weeks
期刊介绍: The main objective of Ocean Modelling is to provide rapid communication between those interested in ocean modelling, whether through direct observation, or through analytical, numerical or laboratory models, and including interactions between physical and biogeochemical or biological phenomena. Because of the intimate links between ocean and atmosphere, involvement of scientists interested in influences of either medium on the other is welcome. The journal has a wide scope and includes ocean-atmosphere interaction in various forms as well as pure ocean results. In addition to primary peer-reviewed papers, the journal provides review papers, preliminary communications, and discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信