比色法与超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法在对扑热息痛血浆浓度定量方面的一致性

{"title":"比色法与超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法在对扑热息痛血浆浓度定量方面的一致性","authors":"","doi":"10.1208/s12248-024-00890-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Special populations, like geriatric patients, experience altered paracetamol pharmacokinetics (PK), complicating pain management. More PK research is essential to optimize paracetamol (acetaminophen) dosing. Yet, the reference method ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) is not readily available. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the agreement between UPLC-MS/MS and the more accessible colorimetric Roche acetaminophen (ACETA) assay in quantifying paracetamol plasma concentrations, to facilitate PK studies and therapeutic drug monitoring for pain management. Patient data and plasma samples were obtained from a prospective study including geriatric patients admitted to the geriatric wards. ACETA and UPLC-MS/MS assays were performed in two separate laboratories. Bland–Altman plot and Passing-Bablok regression were used to assess agreement. Accuracy was evaluated using the McNemar test for a threshold value of 10 mg/L. Population PK modeling was employed to bridge PK data obtained from both methods (NONMEM 7.5). A total of 242 plasma sample pairs were available from 40 geriatric patients (age range, 80–95 years). Paracetamol plasma concentrations from ACETA (median 9.8 [interquartile range 6.1–14.4] mg/L) and UPLC-MS/MS (9.5 [6.2–14.8] mg/L) did not differ significantly (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). No significant proportional nor additive bias was observed between both assay methods. The classification accuracy (at threshold 10 mg/L) was 85% (<em>P</em> = 0.414). The conversion factor between ACETA and UPLC-MS/MS was estimated at 1.06 (relative standard error 5%), yet with a 13.4% (relative standard error 23%) interindividual variability. ACETA assay showed no systematic bias in comparison with the UPLC-MS/MS assay in determining paracetamol exposure in geriatric blood samples despite the imprecision.</p> <span> <h3>Graphical Abstract</h3> <p> <span> <span> <img alt=\"\" src=\"https://static-content.springer.com/image/MediaObjects/12248_2024_890_Figa_HTML.png\"/> </span> </span></p> </span>","PeriodicalId":501692,"journal":{"name":"The AAPS Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement Between a Colorimetric Assay and Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Quantifying Paracetamol Plasma Concentrations\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1208/s12248-024-00890-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Special populations, like geriatric patients, experience altered paracetamol pharmacokinetics (PK), complicating pain management. More PK research is essential to optimize paracetamol (acetaminophen) dosing. Yet, the reference method ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) is not readily available. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the agreement between UPLC-MS/MS and the more accessible colorimetric Roche acetaminophen (ACETA) assay in quantifying paracetamol plasma concentrations, to facilitate PK studies and therapeutic drug monitoring for pain management. Patient data and plasma samples were obtained from a prospective study including geriatric patients admitted to the geriatric wards. ACETA and UPLC-MS/MS assays were performed in two separate laboratories. Bland–Altman plot and Passing-Bablok regression were used to assess agreement. Accuracy was evaluated using the McNemar test for a threshold value of 10 mg/L. Population PK modeling was employed to bridge PK data obtained from both methods (NONMEM 7.5). A total of 242 plasma sample pairs were available from 40 geriatric patients (age range, 80–95 years). Paracetamol plasma concentrations from ACETA (median 9.8 [interquartile range 6.1–14.4] mg/L) and UPLC-MS/MS (9.5 [6.2–14.8] mg/L) did not differ significantly (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). No significant proportional nor additive bias was observed between both assay methods. The classification accuracy (at threshold 10 mg/L) was 85% (<em>P</em> = 0.414). The conversion factor between ACETA and UPLC-MS/MS was estimated at 1.06 (relative standard error 5%), yet with a 13.4% (relative standard error 23%) interindividual variability. ACETA assay showed no systematic bias in comparison with the UPLC-MS/MS assay in determining paracetamol exposure in geriatric blood samples despite the imprecision.</p> <span> <h3>Graphical Abstract</h3> <p> <span> <span> <img alt=\\\"\\\" src=\\\"https://static-content.springer.com/image/MediaObjects/12248_2024_890_Figa_HTML.png\\\"/> </span> </span></p> </span>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The AAPS Journal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The AAPS Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-024-00890-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-024-00890-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 特殊人群(如老年患者)的对乙酰氨基酚药代动力学(PK)会发生变化,从而使疼痛治疗复杂化。为了优化扑热息痛(对乙酰氨基酚)的剂量,必须开展更多的药代动力学研究。然而,参考方法超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法(UPLC-MS/MS)并不容易获得。因此,我们旨在评估超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法与更易获得的罗氏对乙酰氨基酚(ACETA)比色法在对乙酰氨基酚血浆浓度定量方面的一致性,以促进疼痛治疗的 PK 研究和治疗药物监测。患者数据和血浆样本来自一项前瞻性研究,研究对象包括入住老年病房的老年患者。ACETA 和 UPLC-MS/MS 检测分别在两个实验室进行。采用Bland-Altman图和Passing-Bablok回归法评估一致性。使用 McNemar 检验对 10 mg/L 临界值的准确性进行评估。采用种群 PK 模型来连接两种方法(NONMEM 7.5)获得的 PK 数据。共有 242 对血浆样本来自 40 名老年患者(年龄范围为 80-95 岁)。从 ACETA(中位数为 9.8 [四分位距为 6.1-14.4] mg/L)和 UPLC-MS/MS (9.5 [6.2-14.8] mg/L)得出的扑热息痛血浆浓度差异不大(P > 0.05)。两种检测方法之间没有发现明显的比例偏差或叠加偏差。分类准确率(阈值为 10 mg/L)为 85%(P = 0.414)。ACETA 和 UPLC-MS/MS 之间的转换系数估计为 1.06(相对标准误差为 5%),但个体间差异为 13.4%(相对标准误差为 23%)。与 UPLC-MS/MS 检测法相比,ACETA 检测法在确定老年血液样本中扑热息痛暴露量方面没有系统性偏差,尽管存在不精确性。 图表摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agreement Between a Colorimetric Assay and Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Quantifying Paracetamol Plasma Concentrations

Abstract

Special populations, like geriatric patients, experience altered paracetamol pharmacokinetics (PK), complicating pain management. More PK research is essential to optimize paracetamol (acetaminophen) dosing. Yet, the reference method ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) is not readily available. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the agreement between UPLC-MS/MS and the more accessible colorimetric Roche acetaminophen (ACETA) assay in quantifying paracetamol plasma concentrations, to facilitate PK studies and therapeutic drug monitoring for pain management. Patient data and plasma samples were obtained from a prospective study including geriatric patients admitted to the geriatric wards. ACETA and UPLC-MS/MS assays were performed in two separate laboratories. Bland–Altman plot and Passing-Bablok regression were used to assess agreement. Accuracy was evaluated using the McNemar test for a threshold value of 10 mg/L. Population PK modeling was employed to bridge PK data obtained from both methods (NONMEM 7.5). A total of 242 plasma sample pairs were available from 40 geriatric patients (age range, 80–95 years). Paracetamol plasma concentrations from ACETA (median 9.8 [interquartile range 6.1–14.4] mg/L) and UPLC-MS/MS (9.5 [6.2–14.8] mg/L) did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). No significant proportional nor additive bias was observed between both assay methods. The classification accuracy (at threshold 10 mg/L) was 85% (P = 0.414). The conversion factor between ACETA and UPLC-MS/MS was estimated at 1.06 (relative standard error 5%), yet with a 13.4% (relative standard error 23%) interindividual variability. ACETA assay showed no systematic bias in comparison with the UPLC-MS/MS assay in determining paracetamol exposure in geriatric blood samples despite the imprecision.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信