{"title":"将富含二氧化碳的流体包裹体的拉曼分析作为基劳埃阿的大地晴雨表的可靠性","authors":"C.L. DeVitre, P.E. Wieser","doi":"10.7185/geochemlet.2404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interpreting signals of volcanic unrest requires knowledge of the architecture of the magmatic system, particularly the depths at which magmas are stored. Such information can be vital to help predict changes in eruptive style and vigour. However, popular petrological tools to assess magma storage depths (<em>e.g.</em>, melt inclusions) are costly, present large uncertainties, and are too slow for real time monitoring. Here, we evaluate the reliability of Raman Spectroscopy measurements of CO<sub>2</sub>-dominated fluid inclusions as a geobarometer relative to microthermometry and melt inclusion barometry. We calculate storage pressures for 102 olivine-hosted fluid inclusions from the 2018 Lower East Rift Zone eruption of K&imacr;lauea, which are statistically indistinguishable to those determined from melt inclusions. We show that calibrated Raman spectroscopy yields densities within 5–10 % of microthermometry for CO<sub>2</sub>-dominated fluid inclusions (<10 mol % H<sub>2</sub>O) but is a far more suitable method for systems like K&imacr;lauea dominated by shallow magma storage. Overall, pressures determined from fluid inclusions by Raman spectroscopy are robust and require only a fraction of the time and resources of melt inclusion studies.","PeriodicalId":12613,"journal":{"name":"Geochemical Perspectives Letters","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Raman analyses of CO2-rich fluid inclusions as a geobarometer at Kīlauea\",\"authors\":\"C.L. DeVitre, P.E. Wieser\",\"doi\":\"10.7185/geochemlet.2404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Interpreting signals of volcanic unrest requires knowledge of the architecture of the magmatic system, particularly the depths at which magmas are stored. Such information can be vital to help predict changes in eruptive style and vigour. However, popular petrological tools to assess magma storage depths (<em>e.g.</em>, melt inclusions) are costly, present large uncertainties, and are too slow for real time monitoring. Here, we evaluate the reliability of Raman Spectroscopy measurements of CO<sub>2</sub>-dominated fluid inclusions as a geobarometer relative to microthermometry and melt inclusion barometry. We calculate storage pressures for 102 olivine-hosted fluid inclusions from the 2018 Lower East Rift Zone eruption of K&imacr;lauea, which are statistically indistinguishable to those determined from melt inclusions. We show that calibrated Raman spectroscopy yields densities within 5–10 % of microthermometry for CO<sub>2</sub>-dominated fluid inclusions (<10 mol % H<sub>2</sub>O) but is a far more suitable method for systems like K&imacr;lauea dominated by shallow magma storage. Overall, pressures determined from fluid inclusions by Raman spectroscopy are robust and require only a fraction of the time and resources of melt inclusion studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geochemical Perspectives Letters\",\"volume\":\"317 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geochemical Perspectives Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7185/geochemlet.2404\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochemical Perspectives Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7185/geochemlet.2404","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reliability of Raman analyses of CO2-rich fluid inclusions as a geobarometer at Kīlauea
Interpreting signals of volcanic unrest requires knowledge of the architecture of the magmatic system, particularly the depths at which magmas are stored. Such information can be vital to help predict changes in eruptive style and vigour. However, popular petrological tools to assess magma storage depths (e.g., melt inclusions) are costly, present large uncertainties, and are too slow for real time monitoring. Here, we evaluate the reliability of Raman Spectroscopy measurements of CO2-dominated fluid inclusions as a geobarometer relative to microthermometry and melt inclusion barometry. We calculate storage pressures for 102 olivine-hosted fluid inclusions from the 2018 Lower East Rift Zone eruption of Kīlauea, which are statistically indistinguishable to those determined from melt inclusions. We show that calibrated Raman spectroscopy yields densities within 5–10 % of microthermometry for CO2-dominated fluid inclusions (<10 mol % H2O) but is a far more suitable method for systems like Kīlauea dominated by shallow magma storage. Overall, pressures determined from fluid inclusions by Raman spectroscopy are robust and require only a fraction of the time and resources of melt inclusion studies.
期刊介绍:
Geochemical Perspectives Letters is an open access, internationally peer-reviewed journal of the European Association of Geochemistry (EAG) that publishes short, highest-quality articles spanning geochemical sciences. The journal aims at rapid publication of the most novel research in geochemistry with a focus on outstanding quality, international importance, originality, and stimulating new developments across the vast array of geochemical disciplines.