研究智障成人对 VIA 优势量表认知的可及性

IF 2.1 3区医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1111/jar.13202

Kimberly Greenberg, Brice Hounshel, Luke Kalb, Ariel Schwartz

{"title":"研究智障成人对 VIA 优势量表认知的可及性","authors":"Kimberly Greenberg, Brice Hounshel, Luke Kalb, Ariel Schwartz","doi":"10.1111/jar.13202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>We evaluated cognitive accessibility of the VIA Inventory of Strengths Youth short form with adults with intellectual disability for use in strengths-based practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted cognitive testing with adults with intellectual disability (<i>n</i> = 33; <i>M</i> age = 36.2; range: 20.4–64.2). Data were coded for the extent to which (1) items were interpreted correctly; (2) participants endorsed items as describing themselves. We calculated descriptive statistics to evaluate item interpretation and response scale use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>On average, 59% of participants interpreted items correctly, 20% misinterpreted items, 14% had mixed interpretations. Positive item endorsement was most associated with the response ‘Very much like me’ (77%); mixed endorsement was most associated with ‘Somewhat like me’ (39%); and negative endorsement of items was most associated with ‘Not at all like me’ (54%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Revisions are necessary for several items to improve accessibility for adults with intellectual disability and should be made in collaboration with this population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining cognitive accessibility of the VIA Inventory of Strengths for adults with intellectual disability\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly Greenberg, Brice Hounshel, Luke Kalb, Ariel Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jar.13202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>We evaluated cognitive accessibility of the VIA Inventory of Strengths Youth short form with adults with intellectual disability for use in strengths-based practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted cognitive testing with adults with intellectual disability (<i>n</i> = 33; <i>M</i> age = 36.2; range: 20.4–64.2). Data were coded for the extent to which (1) items were interpreted correctly; (2) participants endorsed items as describing themselves. We calculated descriptive statistics to evaluate item interpretation and response scale use.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>On average, 59% of participants interpreted items correctly, 20% misinterpreted items, 14% had mixed interpretations. Positive item endorsement was most associated with the response ‘Very much like me’ (77%); mixed endorsement was most associated with ‘Somewhat like me’ (39%); and negative endorsement of items was most associated with ‘Not at all like me’ (54%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Revisions are necessary for several items to improve accessibility for adults with intellectual disability and should be made in collaboration with this population.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.13202\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.13202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们评估了 VIA 青少年优势简表在智障成人中的认知可及性，以便在优势实践中使用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Examining cognitive accessibility of the VIA Inventory of Strengths for adults with intellectual disability

Background

We evaluated cognitive accessibility of the VIA Inventory of Strengths Youth short form with adults with intellectual disability for use in strengths-based practice.

Methods

We conducted cognitive testing with adults with intellectual disability (n = 33; M age = 36.2; range: 20.4–64.2). Data were coded for the extent to which (1) items were interpreted correctly; (2) participants endorsed items as describing themselves. We calculated descriptive statistics to evaluate item interpretation and response scale use.

Results

On average, 59% of participants interpreted items correctly, 20% misinterpreted items, 14% had mixed interpretations. Positive item endorsement was most associated with the response ‘Very much like me’ (77%); mixed endorsement was most associated with ‘Somewhat like me’ (39%); and negative endorsement of items was most associated with ‘Not at all like me’ (54%).

Conclusions

Revisions are necessary for several items to improve accessibility for adults with intellectual disability and should be made in collaboration with this population.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities Multiple-

CiteScore

4.70

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.