{"title":"评估协作网络的稳定性:结构凝聚力分析视角","authors":"Dayong Zhang , Hao Men , Zhaoxin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2024.101490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In collaboration networks, a stable structure can lead to trust and enhance group members’ ties, in turn reducing conflicts and promoting communication and cooperation. Therefore, network stability assessment, especially for collaboration networks, is essential for facilitating the achievement of group goals. However, most previous studies have considered only a fundamental understanding of network stability from the perspective of network connectivity or interpersonal relationships. Few studies have been conducted to reveal the influence of endogenous structural cohesion on network stability. In fact, greater structural cohesion indicates greater adaptability in uncertain environments. Thus, we propose evaluating the stability of collaboration networks from a structural cohesion perspective. Our study focuses on two dimensions of structural cohesion: core member identification and structural robustness measurements. Considering the unique structure of collaboration networks, a new algorithm, named the improved K-shell decomposition algorithm, is proposed to identify the core member set embedded in the innermost layer of a network. Compared with traditional identification algorithms, our algorithm can achieve a better trade-off between computational accuracy and computational complexity. Experimental results obtained on real-world networks verify the performance of our algorithm. In addition, it was found that the stability of collaboration networks can be effectively improved through targeted prevention efforts at the core members identified by our algorithm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"18 1","pages":"Article 101490"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724000038/pdfft?md5=10df3868fe122aadb2793b254dde7e62&pid=1-s2.0-S1751157724000038-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the stability of collaboration networks: A structural cohesion analysis perspective\",\"authors\":\"Dayong Zhang , Hao Men , Zhaoxin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joi.2024.101490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In collaboration networks, a stable structure can lead to trust and enhance group members’ ties, in turn reducing conflicts and promoting communication and cooperation. Therefore, network stability assessment, especially for collaboration networks, is essential for facilitating the achievement of group goals. However, most previous studies have considered only a fundamental understanding of network stability from the perspective of network connectivity or interpersonal relationships. Few studies have been conducted to reveal the influence of endogenous structural cohesion on network stability. In fact, greater structural cohesion indicates greater adaptability in uncertain environments. Thus, we propose evaluating the stability of collaboration networks from a structural cohesion perspective. Our study focuses on two dimensions of structural cohesion: core member identification and structural robustness measurements. Considering the unique structure of collaboration networks, a new algorithm, named the improved K-shell decomposition algorithm, is proposed to identify the core member set embedded in the innermost layer of a network. Compared with traditional identification algorithms, our algorithm can achieve a better trade-off between computational accuracy and computational complexity. Experimental results obtained on real-world networks verify the performance of our algorithm. In addition, it was found that the stability of collaboration networks can be effectively improved through targeted prevention efforts at the core members identified by our algorithm.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Informetrics\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101490\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724000038/pdfft?md5=10df3868fe122aadb2793b254dde7e62&pid=1-s2.0-S1751157724000038-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Informetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724000038\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Informetrics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724000038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在协作网络中,稳定的结构可以带来信任,加强团体成员之间的联系,从而减少冲突,促进交流与合作。因此,网络稳定性评估,尤其是协作网络的稳定性评估,对于促进群体目标的实现至关重要。然而,以往的大多数研究都只是从网络连接性或人际关系的角度来考虑对网络稳定性的基本认识。很少有研究揭示内生结构凝聚力对网络稳定性的影响。事实上,结构凝聚力越强,表明在不确定环境中的适应能力越强。因此,我们建议从结构凝聚力的角度来评估协作网络的稳定性。我们的研究侧重于结构凝聚力的两个维度:核心成员识别和结构稳健性测量。考虑到协作网络的独特结构,我们提出了一种新算法--改进的 K 壳分解算法--来识别嵌入网络最内层的核心成员集。与传统的识别算法相比,我们的算法能在计算精度和计算复杂度之间实现更好的权衡。在实际网络中获得的实验结果验证了我们算法的性能。此外,实验还发现,通过对算法识别出的核心成员进行有针对性的防范,可以有效提高协作网络的稳定性。
Assessing the stability of collaboration networks: A structural cohesion analysis perspective
In collaboration networks, a stable structure can lead to trust and enhance group members’ ties, in turn reducing conflicts and promoting communication and cooperation. Therefore, network stability assessment, especially for collaboration networks, is essential for facilitating the achievement of group goals. However, most previous studies have considered only a fundamental understanding of network stability from the perspective of network connectivity or interpersonal relationships. Few studies have been conducted to reveal the influence of endogenous structural cohesion on network stability. In fact, greater structural cohesion indicates greater adaptability in uncertain environments. Thus, we propose evaluating the stability of collaboration networks from a structural cohesion perspective. Our study focuses on two dimensions of structural cohesion: core member identification and structural robustness measurements. Considering the unique structure of collaboration networks, a new algorithm, named the improved K-shell decomposition algorithm, is proposed to identify the core member set embedded in the innermost layer of a network. Compared with traditional identification algorithms, our algorithm can achieve a better trade-off between computational accuracy and computational complexity. Experimental results obtained on real-world networks verify the performance of our algorithm. In addition, it was found that the stability of collaboration networks can be effectively improved through targeted prevention efforts at the core members identified by our algorithm.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Informetrics (JOI) publishes rigorous high-quality research on quantitative aspects of information science. The main focus of the journal is on topics in bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics, patentometrics, altmetrics and research evaluation. Contributions studying informetric problems using methods from other quantitative fields, such as mathematics, statistics, computer science, economics and econometrics, and network science, are especially encouraged. JOI publishes both theoretical and empirical work. In general, case studies, for instance a bibliometric analysis focusing on a specific research field or a specific country, are not considered suitable for publication in JOI, unless they contain innovative methodological elements.