氟化钠和血清分离管中葡萄糖浓度的比较和稳定性研究

IF 1.7 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Mustapha Dibbasey, Solomon Umukoro, Abdoulie Bojang
{"title":"氟化钠和血清分离管中葡萄糖浓度的比较和稳定性研究","authors":"Mustapha Dibbasey,&nbsp;Solomon Umukoro,&nbsp;Abdoulie Bojang","doi":"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Sodium fluoride/potassium oxalate (NaF/KOx) tubes has been regarded as the gold-standard tubes for glucose analysis. Even though their ineffectiveness in immediately inhibiting glycolysis has been reported in several studies especially in the first 1–4h, they are still used in our clinical biochemistry laboratory for glucose measurement. However, in its absence, only serum separator tubes are employed for glucose measurement. We aim to determine whether serum separator tubes (SSTs) can replace NaF/KOx tubes for laboratory measurement of blood glucose and to assess the stability of glucose concentrations for 3 days period.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and findings</h3><p>NaF/KOx tube type was the reference method while SSTs type was the candidate method for glucose measurement. A total of 50 paired samples collected separately in NaF/KOx tubes and SSTs from healthy adult participants in the Gambia Adults Reference Intervals Study (GARIS) project were used as the project sample size. Following blood collection and separation, the glucose concentration was measured within 2 h, and at 24h, 42h and 72h time-points. Our data analysis showed no significant difference in the mean glucose concentrations between the reference tube and candidate tube types (Mean difference = 0.06 mmol/L; P = 0.38) recorded in the different timepoints. Using growth trajectory and mixed effects model, the study data further showed no significant change in the glucose concentrations (p = 0.25) for three days period.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study confirms that SSTs can produce similar glucose results when employed in the absence of NaF/KOx tubes. Besides, the glucose concentrations were stable in both tubes for three days when the samples were separated within 2 h and refrigerated in 2–8°C.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20421,"journal":{"name":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article e00360"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000064/pdfft?md5=853bc903207429646d72e91070a938b5&pid=1-s2.0-S2352551724000064-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative and stability study of glucose concentrations measured in both sodium fluoride and serum separator tubes\",\"authors\":\"Mustapha Dibbasey,&nbsp;Solomon Umukoro,&nbsp;Abdoulie Bojang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Sodium fluoride/potassium oxalate (NaF/KOx) tubes has been regarded as the gold-standard tubes for glucose analysis. Even though their ineffectiveness in immediately inhibiting glycolysis has been reported in several studies especially in the first 1–4h, they are still used in our clinical biochemistry laboratory for glucose measurement. However, in its absence, only serum separator tubes are employed for glucose measurement. We aim to determine whether serum separator tubes (SSTs) can replace NaF/KOx tubes for laboratory measurement of blood glucose and to assess the stability of glucose concentrations for 3 days period.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and findings</h3><p>NaF/KOx tube type was the reference method while SSTs type was the candidate method for glucose measurement. A total of 50 paired samples collected separately in NaF/KOx tubes and SSTs from healthy adult participants in the Gambia Adults Reference Intervals Study (GARIS) project were used as the project sample size. Following blood collection and separation, the glucose concentration was measured within 2 h, and at 24h, 42h and 72h time-points. Our data analysis showed no significant difference in the mean glucose concentrations between the reference tube and candidate tube types (Mean difference = 0.06 mmol/L; P = 0.38) recorded in the different timepoints. Using growth trajectory and mixed effects model, the study data further showed no significant change in the glucose concentrations (p = 0.25) for three days period.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study confirms that SSTs can produce similar glucose results when employed in the absence of NaF/KOx tubes. Besides, the glucose concentrations were stable in both tubes for three days when the samples were separated within 2 h and refrigerated in 2–8°C.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000064/pdfft?md5=853bc903207429646d72e91070a938b5&pid=1-s2.0-S2352551724000064-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:氟化钠/草酸钾(NaF/KOx)试管一直被视为葡萄糖分析的黄金标准试管。尽管有多项研究报告称它们无法立即抑制糖酵解,尤其是在最初的 1-4 小时内,但在我们的临床生化实验室中,它们仍被用于葡萄糖测量。然而,在没有血清分离管的情况下,只能使用血清分离管进行葡萄糖测量。我们的目的是确定血清分离管(SST)能否取代 NaF/KOx 管用于实验室血糖测量,并评估 3 天内血糖浓度的稳定性。在冈比亚成人参考区间研究(GARIS)项目中,从健康的成人参与者中分别用 NaF/KOx 管和 SST 采集了 50 个配对样本作为项目样本量。采血和分离后,在 2 小时内、24 小时、42 小时和 72 小时的时间点测量葡萄糖浓度。我们的数据分析显示,参考试管和候选试管类型在不同时间点记录的平均葡萄糖浓度无明显差异(平均差异 = 0.06 mmol/L;P = 0.38)。使用生长轨迹和混合效应模型,研究数据进一步表明,三天内葡萄糖浓度没有显著变化(P = 0.25)。此外,当样品在 2 小时内分离并冷藏于 2-8°C,两种试管中的葡萄糖浓度在三天内均保持稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative and stability study of glucose concentrations measured in both sodium fluoride and serum separator tubes

Introduction

Sodium fluoride/potassium oxalate (NaF/KOx) tubes has been regarded as the gold-standard tubes for glucose analysis. Even though their ineffectiveness in immediately inhibiting glycolysis has been reported in several studies especially in the first 1–4h, they are still used in our clinical biochemistry laboratory for glucose measurement. However, in its absence, only serum separator tubes are employed for glucose measurement. We aim to determine whether serum separator tubes (SSTs) can replace NaF/KOx tubes for laboratory measurement of blood glucose and to assess the stability of glucose concentrations for 3 days period.

Methods and findings

NaF/KOx tube type was the reference method while SSTs type was the candidate method for glucose measurement. A total of 50 paired samples collected separately in NaF/KOx tubes and SSTs from healthy adult participants in the Gambia Adults Reference Intervals Study (GARIS) project were used as the project sample size. Following blood collection and separation, the glucose concentration was measured within 2 h, and at 24h, 42h and 72h time-points. Our data analysis showed no significant difference in the mean glucose concentrations between the reference tube and candidate tube types (Mean difference = 0.06 mmol/L; P = 0.38) recorded in the different timepoints. Using growth trajectory and mixed effects model, the study data further showed no significant change in the glucose concentrations (p = 0.25) for three days period.

Conclusions

The study confirms that SSTs can produce similar glucose results when employed in the absence of NaF/KOx tubes. Besides, the glucose concentrations were stable in both tubes for three days when the samples were separated within 2 h and refrigerated in 2–8°C.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Practical Laboratory Medicine Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical Laboratory Medicine is a high-quality, peer-reviewed, international open-access journal publishing original research, new methods and critical evaluations, case reports and short papers in the fields of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The objective of the journal is to provide practical information of immediate relevance to workers in clinical laboratories. The primary scope of the journal covers clinical chemistry, hematology, molecular biology and genetics relevant to laboratory medicine, microbiology, immunology, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory management and informatics. We welcome papers which describe critical evaluations of biomarkers and their role in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant disease, validation of commercial and in-house IVD methods, method comparisons, interference reports, the development of new reagents and reference materials, reference range studies and regulatory compliance reports. Manuscripts describing the development of new methods applicable to laboratory medicine (including point-of-care testing) are particularly encouraged, even if preliminary or small scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信