在较低剂量的 COVID-19 mRNA 疫苗中,S-6P 的免疫原性优于 S-2P

Zhongyi Zhu , Lei Zhang , Shuangbao Li , Yang Gao , Yuwei Wang , Xiaofei Ma , Zhonglin Chen , Siyu Wu , Yonghui Zhang , Mengyuan Zhang , Zhihao Xie , Changcheng Yin , Weijun Chen , Fuxing Zeng , Jinmin Ma
{"title":"在较低剂量的 COVID-19 mRNA 疫苗中,S-6P 的免疫原性优于 S-2P","authors":"Zhongyi Zhu ,&nbsp;Lei Zhang ,&nbsp;Shuangbao Li ,&nbsp;Yang Gao ,&nbsp;Yuwei Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Ma ,&nbsp;Zhonglin Chen ,&nbsp;Siyu Wu ,&nbsp;Yonghui Zhang ,&nbsp;Mengyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhihao Xie ,&nbsp;Changcheng Yin ,&nbsp;Weijun Chen ,&nbsp;Fuxing Zeng ,&nbsp;Jinmin Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.dcit.2024.100017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to determine whether a new combination of immunogens could be more effective than the S–2P design in terms of eliciting an immune response. The study aimed to use a unified formulation standard to make a comparison between the new immunogen combination than the S–2P design.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study analyzed the published immunogen mutation strategies of known COVID-19 vaccines and also Spike protein variants in the RCSB database to identify the most promising immunogen combination. By choosing different Spike protein variants, we prepared well characterized mRNA preparations and administered them to BALB/C mice using a commercial lipid for encapsulation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study found that our mRNA preparations stimulated strong humoral and cellular immunity, with a neutralizing antibody titer of &gt;1*10<sup>4</sup> at 28 days and a Th1-biased cellular immune response. Furthermore, our results indicate that the S–6P-GSAS variant elicits superior immunogenicity at lower doses compared to the S–2P variant.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study suggests that the S–6P-GSAS variant may elicit a stronger immune response at lower doses compared to the S–2P design, indicating its potential as a promising immunogen candidate for COVID-19 vaccines. Further research is needed to explore the efficacy of this novel combination in addressing the challenges posed by emerging Spike protein variants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100358,"journal":{"name":"Decoding Infection and Transmission","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100017"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949924024000016/pdfft?md5=08289a1424f0e2c2817dc353af88ff06&pid=1-s2.0-S2949924024000016-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"S–6P exhibits better immunogenicity than S–2P at lower doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines\",\"authors\":\"Zhongyi Zhu ,&nbsp;Lei Zhang ,&nbsp;Shuangbao Li ,&nbsp;Yang Gao ,&nbsp;Yuwei Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Ma ,&nbsp;Zhonglin Chen ,&nbsp;Siyu Wu ,&nbsp;Yonghui Zhang ,&nbsp;Mengyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhihao Xie ,&nbsp;Changcheng Yin ,&nbsp;Weijun Chen ,&nbsp;Fuxing Zeng ,&nbsp;Jinmin Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dcit.2024.100017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to determine whether a new combination of immunogens could be more effective than the S–2P design in terms of eliciting an immune response. The study aimed to use a unified formulation standard to make a comparison between the new immunogen combination than the S–2P design.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study analyzed the published immunogen mutation strategies of known COVID-19 vaccines and also Spike protein variants in the RCSB database to identify the most promising immunogen combination. By choosing different Spike protein variants, we prepared well characterized mRNA preparations and administered them to BALB/C mice using a commercial lipid for encapsulation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study found that our mRNA preparations stimulated strong humoral and cellular immunity, with a neutralizing antibody titer of &gt;1*10<sup>4</sup> at 28 days and a Th1-biased cellular immune response. Furthermore, our results indicate that the S–6P-GSAS variant elicits superior immunogenicity at lower doses compared to the S–2P variant.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study suggests that the S–6P-GSAS variant may elicit a stronger immune response at lower doses compared to the S–2P design, indicating its potential as a promising immunogen candidate for COVID-19 vaccines. Further research is needed to explore the efficacy of this novel combination in addressing the challenges posed by emerging Spike protein variants.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decoding Infection and Transmission\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949924024000016/pdfft?md5=08289a1424f0e2c2817dc353af88ff06&pid=1-s2.0-S2949924024000016-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decoding Infection and Transmission\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949924024000016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decoding Infection and Transmission","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949924024000016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在确定新的免疫原组合是否比S-2P设计更能激发免疫反应。方法本研究分析了已发表的已知 COVID-19 疫苗的免疫原突变策略以及 RCSB 数据库中的 Spike 蛋白变体,以确定最有前景的免疫原组合。通过选择不同的斯派克蛋白变体,我们制备了特性良好的 mRNA 制剂,并使用商用脂质进行封装,将其注射给 BALB/C 小鼠。结果研究发现,我们的 mRNA 制剂能激发强烈的体液和细胞免疫,28 天时中和抗体滴度为 1*104,细胞免疫反应以 Th1 为主。此外,我们的研究结果表明,与 S-2P 变体相比,S-6P-GSAS 变体可在较低剂量下激发更强的免疫原性。结论我们的研究表明,与 S-2P 设计相比,S-6P-GSAS 变体可在较低剂量下激发更强的免疫反应,这表明它有潜力成为 COVID-19 疫苗的候选免疫原。还需要进一步研究探索这种新型组合在应对新出现的穗状病毒蛋白变体所带来的挑战方面的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

S–6P exhibits better immunogenicity than S–2P at lower doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines

S–6P exhibits better immunogenicity than S–2P at lower doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine whether a new combination of immunogens could be more effective than the S–2P design in terms of eliciting an immune response. The study aimed to use a unified formulation standard to make a comparison between the new immunogen combination than the S–2P design.

Methods

The study analyzed the published immunogen mutation strategies of known COVID-19 vaccines and also Spike protein variants in the RCSB database to identify the most promising immunogen combination. By choosing different Spike protein variants, we prepared well characterized mRNA preparations and administered them to BALB/C mice using a commercial lipid for encapsulation.

Results

The study found that our mRNA preparations stimulated strong humoral and cellular immunity, with a neutralizing antibody titer of >1*104 at 28 days and a Th1-biased cellular immune response. Furthermore, our results indicate that the S–6P-GSAS variant elicits superior immunogenicity at lower doses compared to the S–2P variant.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that the S–6P-GSAS variant may elicit a stronger immune response at lower doses compared to the S–2P design, indicating its potential as a promising immunogen candidate for COVID-19 vaccines. Further research is needed to explore the efficacy of this novel combination in addressing the challenges posed by emerging Spike protein variants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信