跨级别事件管理。基层医疗区的经验

Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.semerg.2023.102179
A. Ortega Carpio , J. Rioja Ulgar , A. Mestraitua Vázquez , Y. Arco Prados , J. Córdoba Gómez , F. Carmona Romero
{"title":"跨级别事件管理。基层医疗区的经验","authors":"A. Ortega Carpio ,&nbsp;J. Rioja Ulgar ,&nbsp;A. Mestraitua Vázquez ,&nbsp;Y. Arco Prados ,&nbsp;J. Córdoba Gómez ,&nbsp;F. Carmona Romero","doi":"10.1016/j.semerg.2023.102179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>Determine the prevalence and define the profile of interlevel incidences (ININ) between primary care (PC) and hospital (HC).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Multicenter cross-sectional descriptive study.</p></div><div><h3>Site</h3><p>Primary care.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Professionals from a Health District and its reference hospitals.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>ININ are errors in communication between PC and HC professionals derived from administrative, pharmaceutical or clinical procedures not resolved during the formal interlevel communication processes, which requires a coordinated and validated response from the health care directions to not overload the family physician.</p></div><div><h3>Main measurements</h3><p>ININ by category, hospital services and health centers, total and validated, relative to the total number of referrals, and the reason for the ININ.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We detected 2011 ININs (3.36%) among the 59.859 referrals, although only 1684 were validated (83.7%). Most were administrative (59.5%), followed by pharmaceutical (24.2%), clinical (10.2%) and reverse (6.1%). 41.3% of the clinical ININs were grouped around 5 hospital specialties, and 45.9% in 5 health centers. The main reasons for clinical ININ were non-prescription of the recommended pharmacological treatment in outpatient clinics or on hospital discharge (27.3%), request for referral to another hospital specialist (27.9%), or request to referral in person to patients who had already been referred by teleconsultation (17.8%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>3.36% of interlevel referrals are accompanied by incidents and 83.7% are validated and processed. It is necessary to develop ININ management tools to guarantee safe healthcare and debureaucratize PC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gestión de incidencias interniveles. La experiencia de un distrito de atención primaria\",\"authors\":\"A. Ortega Carpio ,&nbsp;J. Rioja Ulgar ,&nbsp;A. Mestraitua Vázquez ,&nbsp;Y. Arco Prados ,&nbsp;J. Córdoba Gómez ,&nbsp;F. Carmona Romero\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semerg.2023.102179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>Determine the prevalence and define the profile of interlevel incidences (ININ) between primary care (PC) and hospital (HC).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Multicenter cross-sectional descriptive study.</p></div><div><h3>Site</h3><p>Primary care.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Professionals from a Health District and its reference hospitals.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>ININ are errors in communication between PC and HC professionals derived from administrative, pharmaceutical or clinical procedures not resolved during the formal interlevel communication processes, which requires a coordinated and validated response from the health care directions to not overload the family physician.</p></div><div><h3>Main measurements</h3><p>ININ by category, hospital services and health centers, total and validated, relative to the total number of referrals, and the reason for the ININ.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We detected 2011 ININs (3.36%) among the 59.859 referrals, although only 1684 were validated (83.7%). Most were administrative (59.5%), followed by pharmaceutical (24.2%), clinical (10.2%) and reverse (6.1%). 41.3% of the clinical ININs were grouped around 5 hospital specialties, and 45.9% in 5 health centers. The main reasons for clinical ININ were non-prescription of the recommended pharmacological treatment in outpatient clinics or on hospital discharge (27.3%), request for referral to another hospital specialist (27.9%), or request to referral in person to patients who had already been referred by teleconsultation (17.8%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>3.36% of interlevel referrals are accompanied by incidents and 83.7% are validated and processed. It is necessary to develop ININ management tools to guarantee safe healthcare and debureaucratize PC.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138359323002599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138359323002599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定初级保健(PC)和医院(HC)之间的跨级别事件(ININ)的发生率并确定其概况。干预ININ是指PC和HC专业人员之间因行政、药物或临床程序而产生的沟通错误,这些错误在正式的层级间沟通过程中没有得到解决,这就需要医疗保健方向做出协调和有效的回应,以避免家庭医生的负担过重。大部分是行政性 ININ(59.5%),其次是药物性 ININ(24.2%)、临床 ININ(10.2%)和反向 ININ(6.1%)。41.3% 的临床 ININ 分布在 5 个医院专科,45.9% 分布在 5 个医疗中心。临床 ININ 的主要原因是门诊或出院时未开具建议的药物治疗处方(27.3%)、要求转诊至其他医院的专科医生(27.9%)或要求亲自转诊至已通过远程会诊转诊的病人(17.8%)。有必要开发 ININ 管理工具,以确保医疗保健安全并消除 PC 的官僚化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Gestión de incidencias interniveles. La experiencia de un distrito de atención primaria

Aim

Determine the prevalence and define the profile of interlevel incidences (ININ) between primary care (PC) and hospital (HC).

Design

Multicenter cross-sectional descriptive study.

Site

Primary care.

Participants

Professionals from a Health District and its reference hospitals.

Interventions

ININ are errors in communication between PC and HC professionals derived from administrative, pharmaceutical or clinical procedures not resolved during the formal interlevel communication processes, which requires a coordinated and validated response from the health care directions to not overload the family physician.

Main measurements

ININ by category, hospital services and health centers, total and validated, relative to the total number of referrals, and the reason for the ININ.

Results

We detected 2011 ININs (3.36%) among the 59.859 referrals, although only 1684 were validated (83.7%). Most were administrative (59.5%), followed by pharmaceutical (24.2%), clinical (10.2%) and reverse (6.1%). 41.3% of the clinical ININs were grouped around 5 hospital specialties, and 45.9% in 5 health centers. The main reasons for clinical ININ were non-prescription of the recommended pharmacological treatment in outpatient clinics or on hospital discharge (27.3%), request for referral to another hospital specialist (27.9%), or request to referral in person to patients who had already been referred by teleconsultation (17.8%).

Conclusions

3.36% of interlevel referrals are accompanied by incidents and 83.7% are validated and processed. It is necessary to develop ININ management tools to guarantee safe healthcare and debureaucratize PC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信