前十字韧带重建术后的早期步态生物力学与日常步态的关系

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Christin Büttner, Caroline Lisee, Ashley Buck, Elizabeth Bjornsen, Louise Thoma, Jeffrey Spang, Troy Blackburn, Brian Pietrosimone
{"title":"前十字韧带重建术后的早期步态生物力学与日常步态的关系","authors":"Christin Büttner, Caroline Lisee, Ashley Buck, Elizabeth Bjornsen, Louise Thoma, Jeffrey Spang, Troy Blackburn, Brian Pietrosimone","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0464.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Gait biomechanics and daily steps are important aspects of knee-joint loading that change after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Understanding their relationship during the first 6 months post-ACLR could help clinicians develop comprehensive rehabilitation interventions that promote optimal joint loading after injury, thereby improving long-term knee-joint health.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare biomechanical gait waveforms throughout stance at early time points post-ACLR in individuals with different daily step behaviors at 6 months post-ACLR and to examine how these gait waveforms compare with those of uninjured controls.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Laboratory.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>A total of 32 individuals with primary ACLR assigned to the low-step group (LSG; n = 13) or the high-step group (HSG; n = 19) based on their average daily steps at 6 months post-ACLR and 32 uninjured matched controls.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Gait biomechanics were collected at 2, 4, and 6 months post-ACLR for the ACLR groups and at a single session for the control group. Knee-adduction moment, knee-extension moment (KEM), and knee-flexion angle (KFA) waveforms were calculated during gait stance and then compared via functional waveform analyses. Mean differences and corresponding 95% CIs between groups were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary results demonstrated less KFA (1%-45% versus 79%-92% of stance) and greater KEM (65%-93% of stance) at 2 months and greater knee-adduction moment (14%-20% versus 68%-92% of stance) at 4 months post-ACLR for the HSG compared with the LSG. Knee-adduction moment, KEM, and KFA waveforms differed across various proportions of stance at all time points between the step and control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in gait biomechanics were present at 2 and 4 months post-ACLR between step groups, with the LSG demonstrating an overall more flexed knee and more profound stepwise underloading throughout stance than the HSG. The results indicate a relation between early gait biomechanics and later daily step behaviors post-ACLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":" ","pages":"92-102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Gait Biomechanics Linked to Daily Steps After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Christin Büttner, Caroline Lisee, Ashley Buck, Elizabeth Bjornsen, Louise Thoma, Jeffrey Spang, Troy Blackburn, Brian Pietrosimone\",\"doi\":\"10.4085/1062-6050-0464.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Gait biomechanics and daily steps are important aspects of knee-joint loading that change after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Understanding their relationship during the first 6 months post-ACLR could help clinicians develop comprehensive rehabilitation interventions that promote optimal joint loading after injury, thereby improving long-term knee-joint health.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare biomechanical gait waveforms throughout stance at early time points post-ACLR in individuals with different daily step behaviors at 6 months post-ACLR and to examine how these gait waveforms compare with those of uninjured controls.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Laboratory.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>A total of 32 individuals with primary ACLR assigned to the low-step group (LSG; n = 13) or the high-step group (HSG; n = 19) based on their average daily steps at 6 months post-ACLR and 32 uninjured matched controls.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Gait biomechanics were collected at 2, 4, and 6 months post-ACLR for the ACLR groups and at a single session for the control group. Knee-adduction moment, knee-extension moment (KEM), and knee-flexion angle (KFA) waveforms were calculated during gait stance and then compared via functional waveform analyses. Mean differences and corresponding 95% CIs between groups were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary results demonstrated less KFA (1%-45% versus 79%-92% of stance) and greater KEM (65%-93% of stance) at 2 months and greater knee-adduction moment (14%-20% versus 68%-92% of stance) at 4 months post-ACLR for the HSG compared with the LSG. Knee-adduction moment, KEM, and KFA waveforms differed across various proportions of stance at all time points between the step and control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in gait biomechanics were present at 2 and 4 months post-ACLR between step groups, with the LSG demonstrating an overall more flexed knee and more profound stepwise underloading throughout stance than the HSG. The results indicate a relation between early gait biomechanics and later daily step behaviors post-ACLR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"92-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866786/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0464.23\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0464.23","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:步态生物力学和日常步数是膝关节负荷的重要方面,在前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后会发生变化。了解它们在前交叉韧带重建术后头 6 个月的关系有助于制定全面的康复干预措施,促进伤后关节负荷的优化,从而改善膝关节的长期健康状况:我们的主要目的是比较 ACLR 术后 6 个月时,具有不同日常步态的个体在术后早期时间点整个站立过程中的生物力学步态波形。次要目的是研究这些步态波形与未受伤的对照组步态波形的比较:设计:病例对照研究:患者或其他参与者根据前交叉韧带复位术后 6 个月的日平均步数,将原发性前交叉韧带复位患者分配到低步数组(LSG)(13 人)或高步数组(HSG)(19 人),以及未受伤的匹配对照组(32 人):主要结果测量:在前交叉韧带复位术后 2 个月、4 个月和 6 个月时收集前交叉韧带复位者的步态生物力学数据,在单次治疗中收集对照组的步态生物力学数据。计算步态期间的膝内收力矩(KAM)、膝外展力矩(KEM)和膝关节屈曲角(KFA)波形,然后通过功能波形分析进行比较。报告了组间的平均差异和相应的 95% 置信区间:主要结果表明,与 LSG 相比,HSG 在 ACLR 后 2 个月时的 KFA(1-45%,79-92% 的步态)较小,KEM(65-93% 的步态)较大,4 个月时的 KAM(14-20%,68-92% 的步态)较大。在所有时间点,步态组和对照组的KEM、KAM和KFA波形在不同的步态比例上存在差异:结论:ACLR 术后 2 个月和 4 个月时,步态生物力学在步态组之间存在差异,与 HSG 相比,LSG 的膝关节总体上更加屈曲,整个站立过程中的步态欠载程度更深。结果表明,前交叉韧带置换术后早期步态生物力学与后期日常步态行为之间存在一定的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early Gait Biomechanics Linked to Daily Steps After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Context: Gait biomechanics and daily steps are important aspects of knee-joint loading that change after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Understanding their relationship during the first 6 months post-ACLR could help clinicians develop comprehensive rehabilitation interventions that promote optimal joint loading after injury, thereby improving long-term knee-joint health.

Objectives: To compare biomechanical gait waveforms throughout stance at early time points post-ACLR in individuals with different daily step behaviors at 6 months post-ACLR and to examine how these gait waveforms compare with those of uninjured controls.

Design: Case-control study.

Setting: Laboratory.

Patients or other participants: A total of 32 individuals with primary ACLR assigned to the low-step group (LSG; n = 13) or the high-step group (HSG; n = 19) based on their average daily steps at 6 months post-ACLR and 32 uninjured matched controls.

Main outcome measure(s): Gait biomechanics were collected at 2, 4, and 6 months post-ACLR for the ACLR groups and at a single session for the control group. Knee-adduction moment, knee-extension moment (KEM), and knee-flexion angle (KFA) waveforms were calculated during gait stance and then compared via functional waveform analyses. Mean differences and corresponding 95% CIs between groups were reported.

Results: Primary results demonstrated less KFA (1%-45% versus 79%-92% of stance) and greater KEM (65%-93% of stance) at 2 months and greater knee-adduction moment (14%-20% versus 68%-92% of stance) at 4 months post-ACLR for the HSG compared with the LSG. Knee-adduction moment, KEM, and KFA waveforms differed across various proportions of stance at all time points between the step and control groups.

Conclusions: Differences in gait biomechanics were present at 2 and 4 months post-ACLR between step groups, with the LSG demonstrating an overall more flexed knee and more profound stepwise underloading throughout stance than the HSG. The results indicate a relation between early gait biomechanics and later daily step behaviors post-ACLR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Athletic Training
Journal of Athletic Training 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries. The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信