我们为何不按计划进食?食物摄入中短期意向-行为关系的调节因素。

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Matthias Burkard Aulbach, Hannah van Alebeek, Christopher M. Jones, Jens Blechert
{"title":"我们为何不按计划进食?食物摄入中短期意向-行为关系的调节因素。","authors":"Matthias Burkard Aulbach,&nbsp;Hannah van Alebeek,&nbsp;Christopher M. Jones,&nbsp;Jens Blechert","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>A healthy diet is essential for preventing chronic disease and promoting overall health. Translating one's intention to eat healthy into actual behaviour has, however, proven difficult with a range of internal and contextual factors identified as driving eating behaviour.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n <h3> Design</h3> \n <p>We leverage Temporal Self-Regulation Theory to examine these momentary determinants' direct and moderating effects on the intention–behaviour relation with Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n <h3> Methods</h3> \n <p>Eighty-seven healthy participants (<i>m</i><sub>age</sub> = 24.1 years; 59 women, 28 men) reported, 5 times daily for 10 weekdays, their intentions to stick to a self-set dietary restriction goal for the next 3 hr, the goal congruency of their eating behaviour in the past 3 hr, and a range of factors potentially influencing food intake, such as stress, emotions and environmental eating cues.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n <h3> Results</h3> \n <p>Two-part multilevel modelling revealed that craving, availability of goal-incongruent foods, social eating cues, giving in to other temptations and weaker momentary intentions directly increased the risk and severity of goal-incongruent intake within the next 3 hr. Social cues, stress and craving further influence behaviour through altering intention implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Results imply that people regularly fail to implement intentions for 3-hr periods and that a range of factors influences this, both directly and by disrupting intentional processes. While for some barriers, fostering strong intentions throughout the day could be beneficial, others require different strategies for dietary adherence.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"29 3","pages":"576-588"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12714","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why we don't eat as intended: Moderators of the short-term intention–behaviour relation in food intake\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Burkard Aulbach,&nbsp;Hannah van Alebeek,&nbsp;Christopher M. Jones,&nbsp;Jens Blechert\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjhp.12714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>A healthy diet is essential for preventing chronic disease and promoting overall health. Translating one's intention to eat healthy into actual behaviour has, however, proven difficult with a range of internal and contextual factors identified as driving eating behaviour.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n <h3> Design</h3> \\n <p>We leverage Temporal Self-Regulation Theory to examine these momentary determinants' direct and moderating effects on the intention–behaviour relation with Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n <h3> Methods</h3> \\n <p>Eighty-seven healthy participants (<i>m</i><sub>age</sub> = 24.1 years; 59 women, 28 men) reported, 5 times daily for 10 weekdays, their intentions to stick to a self-set dietary restriction goal for the next 3 hr, the goal congruency of their eating behaviour in the past 3 hr, and a range of factors potentially influencing food intake, such as stress, emotions and environmental eating cues.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n <h3> Results</h3> \\n <p>Two-part multilevel modelling revealed that craving, availability of goal-incongruent foods, social eating cues, giving in to other temptations and weaker momentary intentions directly increased the risk and severity of goal-incongruent intake within the next 3 hr. Social cues, stress and craving further influence behaviour through altering intention implementation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Results imply that people regularly fail to implement intentions for 3-hr periods and that a range of factors influences this, both directly and by disrupting intentional processes. While for some barriers, fostering strong intentions throughout the day could be beneficial, others require different strategies for dietary adherence.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"576-588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12714\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12714\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12714","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:健康饮食对于预防慢性疾病和促进整体健康至关重要。然而,将健康饮食的意向转化为实际行为却很困难,因为有一系列内部和环境因素被认为是饮食行为的驱动因素:设计:我们利用 "时间自我调节理论"(Temporal Self-Regulation Theory),通过 "生态瞬间评估"(Ecological Momentary Assessment,EMA)研究这些瞬间决定因素对意向-行为关系的直接和调节作用:87名健康参与者(年龄=24.1岁;59名女性,28名男性)在10个工作日内每天5次报告他们在未来3小时内坚持自我设定的饮食限制目标的意愿、过去3小时内饮食行为的目标一致性以及一系列可能影响食物摄入量的因素,如压力、情绪和环境饮食暗示:由两部分组成的多层次模型显示,渴望、目标不一致食物的可得性、社交进食线索、屈服于其他诱惑和较弱的瞬间意向会直接增加未来 3 小时内摄入目标不一致食物的风险和严重程度。社交线索、压力和渴望通过改变意向的实施进一步影响行为:结论:研究结果表明,人们经常在 3 小时内无法执行意向,这受到一系列因素的影响,既有直接因素,也有干扰意向过程的因素。对于某些障碍,在一天中培养强烈的意向可能是有益的,而对于其他人,则需要采取不同的策略来坚持饮食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Why we don't eat as intended: Moderators of the short-term intention–behaviour relation in food intake

Why we don't eat as intended: Moderators of the short-term intention–behaviour relation in food intake

Objectives

A healthy diet is essential for preventing chronic disease and promoting overall health. Translating one's intention to eat healthy into actual behaviour has, however, proven difficult with a range of internal and contextual factors identified as driving eating behaviour.

Design

We leverage Temporal Self-Regulation Theory to examine these momentary determinants' direct and moderating effects on the intention–behaviour relation with Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA).

Methods

Eighty-seven healthy participants (mage = 24.1 years; 59 women, 28 men) reported, 5 times daily for 10 weekdays, their intentions to stick to a self-set dietary restriction goal for the next 3 hr, the goal congruency of their eating behaviour in the past 3 hr, and a range of factors potentially influencing food intake, such as stress, emotions and environmental eating cues.

Results

Two-part multilevel modelling revealed that craving, availability of goal-incongruent foods, social eating cues, giving in to other temptations and weaker momentary intentions directly increased the risk and severity of goal-incongruent intake within the next 3 hr. Social cues, stress and craving further influence behaviour through altering intention implementation.

Conclusions

Results imply that people regularly fail to implement intentions for 3-hr periods and that a range of factors influences this, both directly and by disrupting intentional processes. While for some barriers, fostering strong intentions throughout the day could be beneficial, others require different strategies for dietary adherence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信