{"title":"肺癌对阿根廷公立和私立医疗机构患者与健康相关的生活质量、经济毒性和家庭经济的影响。","authors":"Federico Augustovski PhD , Florencia Tsou MD , Lucas González MSc , Claudio Martín MD , Silvina Vigo MD , Carolina Gabay MD , Andrea Alcaraz MSc , Fernando Argento MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is Argentina’s first cause of cancer death. Most patients have an advanced stage at diagnosis, with poor expected survival. This study aimed to characterize the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and economic impact of patients treated in the private healthcare sector and compare it with that of the public sector.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We undertook an observational cross-sectional study that extended a previous study to a referral private center in Argentina. Outcomes included the EuroQol EQ-5D-3L (to assess HRQOL), Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (financial toxicity instrument), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment – General Health (to assess productivity loss), and out-of-pocket expenses in adults diagnosed of NSCLC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 30 consecutive patients from a private healthcare center (July 2021 to March 2022), totaling 131 patients (n = 101 from previous public study). The whole sample had low quality of life and relevant economic impact. Patients in the private healthcare sector showed lower disease severity and higher educational level and household income. In addition, private healthcare system patients showed higher utility (0.77 vs 0.73; <em>P</em> < .05) and lower impairment of daily activities (41% vs 59%; <em>P</em><span> = .01). Private health system patients also showed lower financial toxicity as measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity score (23.9 vs 20.14; </span><em>P</em> < .05) but showed no differences when financial toxicity was assessed as a dichotomic variable.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although patients with NSCLC treated in a private healthcare center in Argentina showed a relevant HRQOL and economic impact, this impact was smaller than the one observed in publicly funded hospitals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 94-99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Lung Cancer on Health-Related Quality of Life, Financial Toxicity, and Household Economics in Patients From the Public and the Private Healthcare Sector in Argentina\",\"authors\":\"Federico Augustovski PhD , Florencia Tsou MD , Lucas González MSc , Claudio Martín MD , Silvina Vigo MD , Carolina Gabay MD , Andrea Alcaraz MSc , Fernando Argento MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vhri.2023.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is Argentina’s first cause of cancer death. Most patients have an advanced stage at diagnosis, with poor expected survival. This study aimed to characterize the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and economic impact of patients treated in the private healthcare sector and compare it with that of the public sector.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We undertook an observational cross-sectional study that extended a previous study to a referral private center in Argentina. Outcomes included the EuroQol EQ-5D-3L (to assess HRQOL), Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (financial toxicity instrument), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment – General Health (to assess productivity loss), and out-of-pocket expenses in adults diagnosed of NSCLC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 30 consecutive patients from a private healthcare center (July 2021 to March 2022), totaling 131 patients (n = 101 from previous public study). The whole sample had low quality of life and relevant economic impact. Patients in the private healthcare sector showed lower disease severity and higher educational level and household income. In addition, private healthcare system patients showed higher utility (0.77 vs 0.73; <em>P</em> < .05) and lower impairment of daily activities (41% vs 59%; <em>P</em><span> = .01). Private health system patients also showed lower financial toxicity as measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity score (23.9 vs 20.14; </span><em>P</em> < .05) but showed no differences when financial toxicity was assessed as a dichotomic variable.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although patients with NSCLC treated in a private healthcare center in Argentina showed a relevant HRQOL and economic impact, this impact was smaller than the one observed in publicly funded hospitals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 94-99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109923001371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in health regional issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109923001371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Lung Cancer on Health-Related Quality of Life, Financial Toxicity, and Household Economics in Patients From the Public and the Private Healthcare Sector in Argentina
Objectives
Non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is Argentina’s first cause of cancer death. Most patients have an advanced stage at diagnosis, with poor expected survival. This study aimed to characterize the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and economic impact of patients treated in the private healthcare sector and compare it with that of the public sector.
Methods
We undertook an observational cross-sectional study that extended a previous study to a referral private center in Argentina. Outcomes included the EuroQol EQ-5D-3L (to assess HRQOL), Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (financial toxicity instrument), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment – General Health (to assess productivity loss), and out-of-pocket expenses in adults diagnosed of NSCLC.
Results
We included 30 consecutive patients from a private healthcare center (July 2021 to March 2022), totaling 131 patients (n = 101 from previous public study). The whole sample had low quality of life and relevant economic impact. Patients in the private healthcare sector showed lower disease severity and higher educational level and household income. In addition, private healthcare system patients showed higher utility (0.77 vs 0.73; P < .05) and lower impairment of daily activities (41% vs 59%; P = .01). Private health system patients also showed lower financial toxicity as measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity score (23.9 vs 20.14; P < .05) but showed no differences when financial toxicity was assessed as a dichotomic variable.
Conclusions
Although patients with NSCLC treated in a private healthcare center in Argentina showed a relevant HRQOL and economic impact, this impact was smaller than the one observed in publicly funded hospitals.