{"title":"减少非笛卡尔正交磁共振成像中读数的聚类。","authors":"Datta Singh Goolaub, Christopher K Macgowan","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-Cartesian magnetic resonance imaging trajectories at golden angle increments have the advantage of allowing motion correction and gating using intermediate real-time reconstructions. However, when the acquired data are cardiac binned for cine imaging, trajectories can cluster together at certain heart rates (HR) causing image artifacts. Here, we demonstrate an approach to reduce clustering by inserting additional angular increments within the trajectory, and optimizing them while still allowing for intermediate reconstructions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three acquisition models were simulated under constant and variable HR: golden angle (M<sub>trd</sub>), random additional angles (M<sub>rnd</sub>), and optimized additional angles (M<sub>opt</sub>). The standard deviations of trajectory angular differences (STAD) were compared through their interquartile ranges (IQR) and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (significance level: p = 0.05). Agreement between an image reconstructed with uniform sampling and images from M<sub>trd</sub>, M<sub>rnd</sub>, and M<sub>opt</sub> was analyzed using the structural similarity index measure (SSIM). M<sub>trd</sub> and M<sub>opt</sub> were compared in three adults at high, low, and no HR variability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>STADs from M<sub>trd</sub> were significantly different (p < 0.05) from M<sub>opt</sub> and M<sub>rnd</sub>. STAD (IQR × 10<sup>-2</sup> rad) showed that M<sub>opt</sub> (0.5) and M<sub>rnd</sub> (0.5) reduced clustering relative to M<sub>trd</sub> (1.9) at constant HR. For variable HR, M<sub>opt</sub> (0.5) and M<sub>rnd</sub> (0.5) outperformed M<sub>trd</sub> (0.9). The SSIM (IQR) showed that M<sub>opt</sub> (0.011) produced the best image quality, followed by M<sub>rnd</sub> (0.014), and M<sub>trd</sub> (0.030). M<sub>opt</sub> outperformed M<sub>trd</sub> at reduced HR variability in in-vivo studies. At high HR variability, both models performed well.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This approach reduces clustering in k-space and improves image quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11211237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing clustering of readouts in non-Cartesian cine magnetic resonance imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Datta Singh Goolaub, Christopher K Macgowan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-Cartesian magnetic resonance imaging trajectories at golden angle increments have the advantage of allowing motion correction and gating using intermediate real-time reconstructions. However, when the acquired data are cardiac binned for cine imaging, trajectories can cluster together at certain heart rates (HR) causing image artifacts. Here, we demonstrate an approach to reduce clustering by inserting additional angular increments within the trajectory, and optimizing them while still allowing for intermediate reconstructions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three acquisition models were simulated under constant and variable HR: golden angle (M<sub>trd</sub>), random additional angles (M<sub>rnd</sub>), and optimized additional angles (M<sub>opt</sub>). The standard deviations of trajectory angular differences (STAD) were compared through their interquartile ranges (IQR) and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (significance level: p = 0.05). Agreement between an image reconstructed with uniform sampling and images from M<sub>trd</sub>, M<sub>rnd</sub>, and M<sub>opt</sub> was analyzed using the structural similarity index measure (SSIM). M<sub>trd</sub> and M<sub>opt</sub> were compared in three adults at high, low, and no HR variability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>STADs from M<sub>trd</sub> were significantly different (p < 0.05) from M<sub>opt</sub> and M<sub>rnd</sub>. STAD (IQR × 10<sup>-2</sup> rad) showed that M<sub>opt</sub> (0.5) and M<sub>rnd</sub> (0.5) reduced clustering relative to M<sub>trd</sub> (1.9) at constant HR. For variable HR, M<sub>opt</sub> (0.5) and M<sub>rnd</sub> (0.5) outperformed M<sub>trd</sub> (0.9). The SSIM (IQR) showed that M<sub>opt</sub> (0.011) produced the best image quality, followed by M<sub>rnd</sub> (0.014), and M<sub>trd</sub> (0.030). M<sub>opt</sub> outperformed M<sub>trd</sub> at reduced HR variability in in-vivo studies. At high HR variability, both models performed well.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This approach reduces clustering in k-space and improves image quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11211237/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:使用黄金角增量的非笛卡尔磁共振成像轨迹的优点是可以利用中间实时重建进行回溯运动校正和基于图像的选通。然而,当获取的数据被心脏分档用于 CINE 成像时,会发现在特定心率下轨迹会聚集在一起,并在 k 空间中留下较大的未采样间隙,从而导致图像伪影。在这项工作中,我们(1)展示了一种通过在轨迹中周期性插入额外角度旋转来减少聚类的方法,(2)使用粒子群优化来优化这些额外角度,同时仍然允许重要的中间重建:模拟了恒定和可变心率下的三种采集模型:传统黄金角度(Mtrd)、随机附加角度(Mrnd)和优化附加角度(Mopt)。为了分析聚类情况,计算了轨迹角差的标准偏差(STAD)。通过四分位数间范围和 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 检验(显著性水平:P = 0.05)对 STAD 的分布进行比较。通过计算结构相似性指数(SSIM)及其四分位数间范围,分析了采用均匀采样重建的参考图像与通过 Mtrd、Mrnd 和 Mopt 获得的图像之间的一致性。然后对 3 名健康成人在 3 种心率变异水平(高、低和无)下的 Mtrd 和 Mopt 进行了比较:结果:Mtrd 的 STAD 分布与 Mopt 和 Mrnd 的 STAD 分布有显著差异(p < 0.05)。STAD(四分位数间距 x 10-2rad)显示,与 Mtrd(1.9)相比,在恒定心率下,Mopt(0.5)和 Mrnd(0.5)减少了聚类。同样,在心率可变的情况下,Mopt (0.5) 和 Mrnd (0.5) 也优于 Mtrd (0.9)。建议的方法降低了聚类风险。相对于地面实况重建的 SSIM(四分位间范围)显示,Mopt(0.011)生成的图像质量最好,其次是 Mrnd(0.014),而 Mtrd(0.030)生成的图像质量最差。体内研究表明,在心率变异性降低的情况下,Mopt 的图像质量优于 Mtrd,而且聚类风险也降低了。在心率变异性较高的情况下,两种模型都表现良好:这种方法减少了 k 空间中的聚类现象,在不影响采集时间的情况下提高了图像质量。
Reducing clustering of readouts in non-Cartesian cine magnetic resonance imaging.
Background: Non-Cartesian magnetic resonance imaging trajectories at golden angle increments have the advantage of allowing motion correction and gating using intermediate real-time reconstructions. However, when the acquired data are cardiac binned for cine imaging, trajectories can cluster together at certain heart rates (HR) causing image artifacts. Here, we demonstrate an approach to reduce clustering by inserting additional angular increments within the trajectory, and optimizing them while still allowing for intermediate reconstructions.
Methods: Three acquisition models were simulated under constant and variable HR: golden angle (Mtrd), random additional angles (Mrnd), and optimized additional angles (Mopt). The standard deviations of trajectory angular differences (STAD) were compared through their interquartile ranges (IQR) and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (significance level: p = 0.05). Agreement between an image reconstructed with uniform sampling and images from Mtrd, Mrnd, and Mopt was analyzed using the structural similarity index measure (SSIM). Mtrd and Mopt were compared in three adults at high, low, and no HR variability.
Results: STADs from Mtrd were significantly different (p < 0.05) from Mopt and Mrnd. STAD (IQR × 10-2 rad) showed that Mopt (0.5) and Mrnd (0.5) reduced clustering relative to Mtrd (1.9) at constant HR. For variable HR, Mopt (0.5) and Mrnd (0.5) outperformed Mtrd (0.9). The SSIM (IQR) showed that Mopt (0.011) produced the best image quality, followed by Mrnd (0.014), and Mtrd (0.030). Mopt outperformed Mtrd at reduced HR variability in in-vivo studies. At high HR variability, both models performed well.
Conclusion: This approach reduces clustering in k-space and improves image quality.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to:
New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system.
New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis.
Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR.
Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.