在马来西亚开展一项前后对比研究,评估重新设计药房工作流程对改善药房等候时间和减少药物险情的影响。

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jerry Ee Siung Liew, Yew Chong Cheng, Nyet Ling Tai, Angeline Pereira, Vinoth Manivannan, Siok Luan Khoo, Woei Kheen Wong, Huey Kuen Lim, Shi Jing Ong, Nadia Bin Mohd Khairudin, Kristine Sheh Fuen Lee, Benjamin Chuan Ching Loh, Kai Loon Chong, Yee Leng Lee
{"title":"在马来西亚开展一项前后对比研究,评估重新设计药房工作流程对改善药房等候时间和减少药物险情的影响。","authors":"Jerry Ee Siung Liew, Yew Chong Cheng, Nyet Ling Tai, Angeline Pereira, Vinoth Manivannan, Siok Luan Khoo, Woei Kheen Wong, Huey Kuen Lim, Shi Jing Ong, Nadia Bin Mohd Khairudin, Kristine Sheh Fuen Lee, Benjamin Chuan Ching Loh, Kai Loon Chong, Yee Leng Lee","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riad083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of workflow redesign (eaST system) on pharmacy waiting time and near-missed events. We also investigated other factors that may potentially affect these study outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental (before-after) study design was adopted. Pre-intervention data were collected over 7 months (January-July 2017). Subsequently, the workflow redesign (eaST system) was implemented and the effect of the intervention (August 2017-February 2018) was evaluated. Univariate analysis was used to compare the differences between pre-intervention and post-intervention of pharmacy waiting time and near-missed events. Significant factors affecting study outcomes were analysed using linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>A total of 210,530 prescriptions were analysed. The eaST system significantly increases the percentage of prescriptions dispensed within 30 min per day (median = 68 (interquartile range (IQR) = 41) vs. median = 93 (IQR = 33), P < 0.001) and reduced the mean percentage of near-missed events (mean = 50.71 (standard deviation (SD) = 23.95) vs. mean = 27.87 (SD = 12.23), P < 0.001). However, the eaST system's effects on related outcomes were conditional on a three-way interaction effect. The eaST system's effects on pharmacy waiting time were influenced by the number of prescriptions received and the number of PhIS server disruptions. Conversely, the eaST system's effects on near-missed events were influenced by the number of pharmacy personnel and number of controlled medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the eaST system improved the pharmacy waiting time and reduced near-missed events.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"83-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A before-after study to evaluate the effect of pharmacy workflow redesign to improve pharmacy waiting time and reduce medication near misses in Malaysia.\",\"authors\":\"Jerry Ee Siung Liew, Yew Chong Cheng, Nyet Ling Tai, Angeline Pereira, Vinoth Manivannan, Siok Luan Khoo, Woei Kheen Wong, Huey Kuen Lim, Shi Jing Ong, Nadia Bin Mohd Khairudin, Kristine Sheh Fuen Lee, Benjamin Chuan Ching Loh, Kai Loon Chong, Yee Leng Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ijpp/riad083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of workflow redesign (eaST system) on pharmacy waiting time and near-missed events. We also investigated other factors that may potentially affect these study outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental (before-after) study design was adopted. Pre-intervention data were collected over 7 months (January-July 2017). Subsequently, the workflow redesign (eaST system) was implemented and the effect of the intervention (August 2017-February 2018) was evaluated. Univariate analysis was used to compare the differences between pre-intervention and post-intervention of pharmacy waiting time and near-missed events. Significant factors affecting study outcomes were analysed using linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>A total of 210,530 prescriptions were analysed. The eaST system significantly increases the percentage of prescriptions dispensed within 30 min per day (median = 68 (interquartile range (IQR) = 41) vs. median = 93 (IQR = 33), P < 0.001) and reduced the mean percentage of near-missed events (mean = 50.71 (standard deviation (SD) = 23.95) vs. mean = 27.87 (SD = 12.23), P < 0.001). However, the eaST system's effects on related outcomes were conditional on a three-way interaction effect. The eaST system's effects on pharmacy waiting time were influenced by the number of prescriptions received and the number of PhIS server disruptions. Conversely, the eaST system's effects on near-missed events were influenced by the number of pharmacy personnel and number of controlled medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the eaST system improved the pharmacy waiting time and reduced near-missed events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"83-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riad083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riad083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估工作流程重新设计(eaST 系统)对药房等候时间和近乎失误事件的影响。我们还调查了可能影响这些研究结果的其他因素:方法:采用准实验(前后)研究设计。干预前的数据收集历时 7 个月(2017 年 1 月至 7 月)。随后,实施了工作流程重新设计(eaST 系统),并对干预效果进行了评估(2017 年 8 月至 2018 年 2 月)。采用单变量分析比较了干预前和干预后药房等待时间和近乎失误事件的差异。采用线性回归分析法对影响研究结果的重要因素进行了分析:共分析了 210,530 份处方。eaST 系统大幅提高了每天 30 分钟内配药的处方比例(中位数 = 68(四分位距 (IQR) = 41)对中位数 = 93(四分位距 (IQR) = 33),P < 0.001),并降低了近乎失误事件的平均比例(平均值 = 50.71(标准差 (SD) = 23.95)对平均值 = 27.87(标准差 = 12.23),P < 0.001)。然而,eaST 系统对相关结果的影响取决于三方交互效应。eaST 系统对药房等待时间的影响受收到的处方数量和 PhIS 服务器中断次数的影响。相反,eaST 系统对近乎失误事件的影响则受药房人员数量和受控药物数量的影响:总的来说,eaST 系统改善了药房的等待时间,减少了近乎失误事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A before-after study to evaluate the effect of pharmacy workflow redesign to improve pharmacy waiting time and reduce medication near misses in Malaysia.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of workflow redesign (eaST system) on pharmacy waiting time and near-missed events. We also investigated other factors that may potentially affect these study outcomes.

Methods: A quasi-experimental (before-after) study design was adopted. Pre-intervention data were collected over 7 months (January-July 2017). Subsequently, the workflow redesign (eaST system) was implemented and the effect of the intervention (August 2017-February 2018) was evaluated. Univariate analysis was used to compare the differences between pre-intervention and post-intervention of pharmacy waiting time and near-missed events. Significant factors affecting study outcomes were analysed using linear regression analysis.

Key findings: A total of 210,530 prescriptions were analysed. The eaST system significantly increases the percentage of prescriptions dispensed within 30 min per day (median = 68 (interquartile range (IQR) = 41) vs. median = 93 (IQR = 33), P < 0.001) and reduced the mean percentage of near-missed events (mean = 50.71 (standard deviation (SD) = 23.95) vs. mean = 27.87 (SD = 12.23), P < 0.001). However, the eaST system's effects on related outcomes were conditional on a three-way interaction effect. The eaST system's effects on pharmacy waiting time were influenced by the number of prescriptions received and the number of PhIS server disruptions. Conversely, the eaST system's effects on near-missed events were influenced by the number of pharmacy personnel and number of controlled medications.

Conclusions: Overall, the eaST system improved the pharmacy waiting time and reduced near-missed events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信