在波兰两种新型全自动免疫分析系统 Alinity s 系统和 Alinity i 系统上常规使用化学发光检测法对献血和血浆进行血清学筛查的评估和经验

IF 1.7 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Aneta Kopacz , Dorota Kubicka-Russel , Grzegorz Liszewski , Alicja Bukowska , Sylwia Samek , Dorota Malka , Magdalena Łętowska , Piotr Grabarczyk
{"title":"在波兰两种新型全自动免疫分析系统 Alinity s 系统和 Alinity i 系统上常规使用化学发光检测法对献血和血浆进行血清学筛查的评估和经验","authors":"Aneta Kopacz ,&nbsp;Dorota Kubicka-Russel ,&nbsp;Grzegorz Liszewski ,&nbsp;Alicja Bukowska ,&nbsp;Sylwia Samek ,&nbsp;Dorota Malka ,&nbsp;Magdalena Łętowska ,&nbsp;Piotr Grabarczyk","doi":"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In Poland, independent evaluations under the auspices of the Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine (IHTM) are mandated for any new device, assay, systems for screening samples from whole blood and plasma donors prior to implementation by Blood Transfusion Center (BTC). In last 5 years, two new systems were introduced to the market by Abbott GmbH, namely the Alinity s and the Alinity i. The evaluations performed for these two systems included the assessment of sensitivity, specificity and precision for each of the four mandatory serological screening markers in Poland: Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg), Hepatitis C virus antibodies (Anti-HCV), HIV antibodies (anti-HIV) and Syphilis antibodies (anti-<em>Treponema pallidum,</em> anti-TP). Sensitivity was assessed by testing seroconversion panels, HBsAg international reference standard, well characterized local samples, and dilution panels. Specificity was assessed by testing routine donor samples. The results from Alinity i assays were compared to the results from Abbott ARCHITECT i2000SR and Ortho VITROS 3600 assays, while the results from Alinity s assays were compared to the results of ARCHITECT i2000SR assays. The evaluation of the Alinity s and Alinity i assays for sensitivity (100 %), specificity (99,92–100 %) and precision generated results that were as good as or better than generated by routinely used systems, were within acceptance criteria, and met all requirements for screening blood donor samples in accordance with Polish regulations. The specificity of the assays in routine use by BTCs, analyzed after approximately 150,000 donations on both systems, was comparable to the specificity observed during the evaluations at IHTM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20421,"journal":{"name":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article e00364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000106/pdfft?md5=2084406dcb4697eab73ce30be4c33222&pid=1-s2.0-S2352551724000106-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and experience from routine use of chemiluminescence assays for serological screening of blood and plasma donations on the Alinity s system and the Alinity i system, two new fully-automated immunoassay systems in Poland\",\"authors\":\"Aneta Kopacz ,&nbsp;Dorota Kubicka-Russel ,&nbsp;Grzegorz Liszewski ,&nbsp;Alicja Bukowska ,&nbsp;Sylwia Samek ,&nbsp;Dorota Malka ,&nbsp;Magdalena Łętowska ,&nbsp;Piotr Grabarczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In Poland, independent evaluations under the auspices of the Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine (IHTM) are mandated for any new device, assay, systems for screening samples from whole blood and plasma donors prior to implementation by Blood Transfusion Center (BTC). In last 5 years, two new systems were introduced to the market by Abbott GmbH, namely the Alinity s and the Alinity i. The evaluations performed for these two systems included the assessment of sensitivity, specificity and precision for each of the four mandatory serological screening markers in Poland: Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg), Hepatitis C virus antibodies (Anti-HCV), HIV antibodies (anti-HIV) and Syphilis antibodies (anti-<em>Treponema pallidum,</em> anti-TP). Sensitivity was assessed by testing seroconversion panels, HBsAg international reference standard, well characterized local samples, and dilution panels. Specificity was assessed by testing routine donor samples. The results from Alinity i assays were compared to the results from Abbott ARCHITECT i2000SR and Ortho VITROS 3600 assays, while the results from Alinity s assays were compared to the results of ARCHITECT i2000SR assays. The evaluation of the Alinity s and Alinity i assays for sensitivity (100 %), specificity (99,92–100 %) and precision generated results that were as good as or better than generated by routinely used systems, were within acceptance criteria, and met all requirements for screening blood donor samples in accordance with Polish regulations. The specificity of the assays in routine use by BTCs, analyzed after approximately 150,000 donations on both systems, was comparable to the specificity observed during the evaluations at IHTM.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000106/pdfft?md5=2084406dcb4697eab73ce30be4c33222&pid=1-s2.0-S2352551724000106-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在波兰,任何用于筛查全血和血浆献血者样本的新设备、检测方法和系统在输血中心(BTC)实施之前,都必须在血液学和输血医学研究所(IHTM)的支持下进行独立评估。过去 5 年中,雅培公司向市场推出了两款新系统,即 Alinity s 和 Alinity i。对这两款系统进行的评估包括对波兰四种强制性血清学筛查标记物的灵敏度、特异性和精确度的评估:乙型肝炎表面抗原 (HBsAg)、丙型肝炎病毒抗体 (Anti-HCV)、艾滋病病毒抗体 (anti-HIV) 和梅毒抗体 (anti-Treponema pallidum, anti-TP)。灵敏度是通过检测血清转换面板、HBsAg 国际参考标准、特征明确的本地样本和稀释面板来评估的。特异性则通过检测常规捐献者样本来评估。Alinity i 检测的结果与雅培 ARCHITECT i2000SR 和 Ortho VITROS 3600 检测的结果进行了比较,而 Alinity s 检测的结果与 ARCHITECT i2000SR 检测的结果进行了比较。对 Alinity s 和 Alinity i 检测方法的灵敏度(100%)、特异性(99.92%-100%)和精确度进行评估后得出的结果与常规使用的系统得出的结果相当或更好,符合验收标准,并符合波兰法规对献血者样本筛查的所有要求。在两种系统上分析了约 150,000 次献血后,BTC 日常使用的检测特异性与 IHTM 评估期间观察到的特异性相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation and experience from routine use of chemiluminescence assays for serological screening of blood and plasma donations on the Alinity s system and the Alinity i system, two new fully-automated immunoassay systems in Poland

In Poland, independent evaluations under the auspices of the Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine (IHTM) are mandated for any new device, assay, systems for screening samples from whole blood and plasma donors prior to implementation by Blood Transfusion Center (BTC). In last 5 years, two new systems were introduced to the market by Abbott GmbH, namely the Alinity s and the Alinity i. The evaluations performed for these two systems included the assessment of sensitivity, specificity and precision for each of the four mandatory serological screening markers in Poland: Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg), Hepatitis C virus antibodies (Anti-HCV), HIV antibodies (anti-HIV) and Syphilis antibodies (anti-Treponema pallidum, anti-TP). Sensitivity was assessed by testing seroconversion panels, HBsAg international reference standard, well characterized local samples, and dilution panels. Specificity was assessed by testing routine donor samples. The results from Alinity i assays were compared to the results from Abbott ARCHITECT i2000SR and Ortho VITROS 3600 assays, while the results from Alinity s assays were compared to the results of ARCHITECT i2000SR assays. The evaluation of the Alinity s and Alinity i assays for sensitivity (100 %), specificity (99,92–100 %) and precision generated results that were as good as or better than generated by routinely used systems, were within acceptance criteria, and met all requirements for screening blood donor samples in accordance with Polish regulations. The specificity of the assays in routine use by BTCs, analyzed after approximately 150,000 donations on both systems, was comparable to the specificity observed during the evaluations at IHTM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Practical Laboratory Medicine Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical Laboratory Medicine is a high-quality, peer-reviewed, international open-access journal publishing original research, new methods and critical evaluations, case reports and short papers in the fields of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The objective of the journal is to provide practical information of immediate relevance to workers in clinical laboratories. The primary scope of the journal covers clinical chemistry, hematology, molecular biology and genetics relevant to laboratory medicine, microbiology, immunology, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory management and informatics. We welcome papers which describe critical evaluations of biomarkers and their role in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant disease, validation of commercial and in-house IVD methods, method comparisons, interference reports, the development of new reagents and reference materials, reference range studies and regulatory compliance reports. Manuscripts describing the development of new methods applicable to laboratory medicine (including point-of-care testing) are particularly encouraged, even if preliminary or small scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信