狐尾黍制成的复合面条的烹饪特性、氨基酸稠度和功能特性的影响

Mst. Meherunnahar , Md. Mozammel Hoque , Muhammed A Satter , Tanvir Ahmed , Razia Sultana Chowdhury , Shaheen Aziz
{"title":"狐尾黍制成的复合面条的烹饪特性、氨基酸稠度和功能特性的影响","authors":"Mst. Meherunnahar ,&nbsp;Md. Mozammel Hoque ,&nbsp;Muhammed A Satter ,&nbsp;Tanvir Ahmed ,&nbsp;Razia Sultana Chowdhury ,&nbsp;Shaheen Aziz","doi":"10.1016/j.meafoo.2024.100138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The research endeavors to address the exigent demand for augmented nutritional efficacy in food commodities, alongside the escalating preference for expedient, superior, and health-conscious alternatives. As a result, the ongoing investigation aims to formulate instant noodles utilizing a composite blend of flours, including foxtail millet (FMF), wheat (WF), mushroom (MF), and rice bran flour (RBF), followed by a subsequent evaluation of the functional properties, cooking attributes, and amino acid composition of the noodles. The investigation considered distinct proportions of composite flour, specifically 0:100:0:0, 60:30:5:5, 50:40:5:5, and 40:50:5:5 (FMF: WF: MF: RBF), designated as treatment T1 (control), T2, T3, and T4, respectively. The results indicate that composite noodles (T2 to T4) demonstrate significantly higher water absorption indexes (ranging from 189.41 % to 197.28 %) compared to the control noodles (T1) composed solely of wheat flour (100 %), signifying an elevated capacity for water retention. Conversely, the oil absorption index of treatment T1 (214.45 %) surpassed that of treatments T2 (210.14 %), T3 (207.47 %), and T4 (200.64 %), respectively. Similarly, treatment T1 exhibited a higher swelling index (16.57 %), whereas T4 demonstrated a significantly lower swelling index with the highest water solubility (4.51 %). Additionally, the inclusion of foxtail millet flour led to a notable reduction in the optimal cooking time, with T4 requiring the shortest duration (3.45 min). Conversely, the cooking yield varied among treatments, with T4 displaying the lowest yield (42.30 %), while T1 exhibited the highest (48.72 %). Furthermore, in the comparison between control and composite noodles, treatment T4 manifested the highest levels of basic, aromatic, aliphatic, and essential amino acids. It also contained a substantial amount of lysine (11 g/100 g), nearly twice as much as treatment T1 (5 g/100 g). Organoleptic assessment indicated a preference for composite noodles (T2 to T4) in terms of taste and flavor. Therefore, fortifying foxtail millet, wheat, mushroom, and rice bran flour in a ratio of (50:40:5:5) for functional food formulations has the potential to enhance the quality of noodles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100898,"journal":{"name":"Measurement: Food","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772275924000054/pdfft?md5=a3cdcff4cca8300ff49fae32a26afd4f&pid=1-s2.0-S2772275924000054-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of cooking characteristics, amino acid consistency, and functional properties of composite noodles made from foxtail millet\",\"authors\":\"Mst. Meherunnahar ,&nbsp;Md. Mozammel Hoque ,&nbsp;Muhammed A Satter ,&nbsp;Tanvir Ahmed ,&nbsp;Razia Sultana Chowdhury ,&nbsp;Shaheen Aziz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meafoo.2024.100138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The research endeavors to address the exigent demand for augmented nutritional efficacy in food commodities, alongside the escalating preference for expedient, superior, and health-conscious alternatives. As a result, the ongoing investigation aims to formulate instant noodles utilizing a composite blend of flours, including foxtail millet (FMF), wheat (WF), mushroom (MF), and rice bran flour (RBF), followed by a subsequent evaluation of the functional properties, cooking attributes, and amino acid composition of the noodles. The investigation considered distinct proportions of composite flour, specifically 0:100:0:0, 60:30:5:5, 50:40:5:5, and 40:50:5:5 (FMF: WF: MF: RBF), designated as treatment T1 (control), T2, T3, and T4, respectively. The results indicate that composite noodles (T2 to T4) demonstrate significantly higher water absorption indexes (ranging from 189.41 % to 197.28 %) compared to the control noodles (T1) composed solely of wheat flour (100 %), signifying an elevated capacity for water retention. Conversely, the oil absorption index of treatment T1 (214.45 %) surpassed that of treatments T2 (210.14 %), T3 (207.47 %), and T4 (200.64 %), respectively. Similarly, treatment T1 exhibited a higher swelling index (16.57 %), whereas T4 demonstrated a significantly lower swelling index with the highest water solubility (4.51 %). Additionally, the inclusion of foxtail millet flour led to a notable reduction in the optimal cooking time, with T4 requiring the shortest duration (3.45 min). Conversely, the cooking yield varied among treatments, with T4 displaying the lowest yield (42.30 %), while T1 exhibited the highest (48.72 %). Furthermore, in the comparison between control and composite noodles, treatment T4 manifested the highest levels of basic, aromatic, aliphatic, and essential amino acids. It also contained a substantial amount of lysine (11 g/100 g), nearly twice as much as treatment T1 (5 g/100 g). Organoleptic assessment indicated a preference for composite noodles (T2 to T4) in terms of taste and flavor. Therefore, fortifying foxtail millet, wheat, mushroom, and rice bran flour in a ratio of (50:40:5:5) for functional food formulations has the potential to enhance the quality of noodles.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measurement: Food\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772275924000054/pdfft?md5=a3cdcff4cca8300ff49fae32a26afd4f&pid=1-s2.0-S2772275924000054-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measurement: Food\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772275924000054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement: Food","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772275924000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究旨在满足人们对食品营养功效的迫切需求,同时满足人们对便捷、优质和注重健康的替代品的日益增长的偏好。因此,正在进行的调查旨在利用狐尾小米(FMF)、小麦(WF)、蘑菇(MF)和米糠粉(RBF)等面粉的复合混合物配制方便面,然后对方便面的功能特性、烹饪属性和氨基酸组成进行评估。调查考虑了不同比例的复合面粉,具体为 0:100:0:0、60:30:5:5、50:40:5:5 和 40:50:5:5(FMF:WF:MF:RBF),分别称为处理 T1(对照)、T2、T3 和 T4。结果表明,与完全由小麦粉(100%)组成的对照面条(T1)相比,复合面条(T2 至 T4)的吸水指数(从 189.41 % 到 197.28 % 不等)明显更高,这表明其保水能力更强。相反,处理 T1 的吸油指数(214.45 %)分别超过了处理 T2(210.14 %)、处理 T3(207.47 %)和处理 T4(200.64 %)。同样,处理 T1 表现出较高的膨胀指数(16.57 %),而处理 T4 则表现出明显较低的膨胀指数和最高的水溶性(4.51 %)。此外,加入狐尾小麦粉明显缩短了最佳蒸煮时间,其中 T4 所需的时间最短(3.45 分钟)。相反,不同处理的烹饪产量也不同,T4 的产量最低(42.30%),而 T1 的产量最高(48.72%)。此外,在对照组和复合面条的比较中,处理 T4 的基本氨基酸、芳香族氨基酸、脂肪族氨基酸和必需氨基酸含量最高。它还含有大量赖氨酸(11 克/100 克),几乎是处理 T1(5 克/100 克)的两倍。感官评估表明,从口感和风味上看,人们更喜欢复合面条(T2 至 T4)。因此,以(50:40:5:5)的比例强化狐尾黍、小麦、蘑菇和米糠粉用于功能性食品配方有可能提高面条的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of cooking characteristics, amino acid consistency, and functional properties of composite noodles made from foxtail millet

The research endeavors to address the exigent demand for augmented nutritional efficacy in food commodities, alongside the escalating preference for expedient, superior, and health-conscious alternatives. As a result, the ongoing investigation aims to formulate instant noodles utilizing a composite blend of flours, including foxtail millet (FMF), wheat (WF), mushroom (MF), and rice bran flour (RBF), followed by a subsequent evaluation of the functional properties, cooking attributes, and amino acid composition of the noodles. The investigation considered distinct proportions of composite flour, specifically 0:100:0:0, 60:30:5:5, 50:40:5:5, and 40:50:5:5 (FMF: WF: MF: RBF), designated as treatment T1 (control), T2, T3, and T4, respectively. The results indicate that composite noodles (T2 to T4) demonstrate significantly higher water absorption indexes (ranging from 189.41 % to 197.28 %) compared to the control noodles (T1) composed solely of wheat flour (100 %), signifying an elevated capacity for water retention. Conversely, the oil absorption index of treatment T1 (214.45 %) surpassed that of treatments T2 (210.14 %), T3 (207.47 %), and T4 (200.64 %), respectively. Similarly, treatment T1 exhibited a higher swelling index (16.57 %), whereas T4 demonstrated a significantly lower swelling index with the highest water solubility (4.51 %). Additionally, the inclusion of foxtail millet flour led to a notable reduction in the optimal cooking time, with T4 requiring the shortest duration (3.45 min). Conversely, the cooking yield varied among treatments, with T4 displaying the lowest yield (42.30 %), while T1 exhibited the highest (48.72 %). Furthermore, in the comparison between control and composite noodles, treatment T4 manifested the highest levels of basic, aromatic, aliphatic, and essential amino acids. It also contained a substantial amount of lysine (11 g/100 g), nearly twice as much as treatment T1 (5 g/100 g). Organoleptic assessment indicated a preference for composite noodles (T2 to T4) in terms of taste and flavor. Therefore, fortifying foxtail millet, wheat, mushroom, and rice bran flour in a ratio of (50:40:5:5) for functional food formulations has the potential to enhance the quality of noodles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信