以 FER 和土壤颗粒大小为重点的 EPB 护盾隧道泡沫渗透机理分析

IF 8.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
He Huang , Quan Sun , Tao Xu , Wanhuan Zhou
{"title":"以 FER 和土壤颗粒大小为重点的 EPB 护盾隧道泡沫渗透机理分析","authors":"He Huang ,&nbsp;Quan Sun ,&nbsp;Tao Xu ,&nbsp;Wanhuan Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.undsp.2023.11.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Parameters of foam penetration in earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunnelling, such as permeability coefficients and penetration distances, significantly impact tunnel face stability. However, existing studies have faced inaccuracies in analysing these parameters due to imitations in experimental methods. This study addresses this issue by employing enhanced methods for a more precise analysis of foam penetration. Experiments involving three distinct sand types (coarse, medium, and fine) and three foam expansion ratios (FER) (10, 15, and 20) are conducted using a modified model test setup. Benefiting from a novel computer vision-based method, the model test outcomes unveil two distinct foam penetration paths: liquid migration (<em>L</em><sub>w</sub>) and bubble migration (<em>L</em><sub>f</sub>). Three penetration phases — namely, injection, blockage &amp; drainage, and breakage — are identified based on <em>L</em><sub>w</sub> and <em>L</em><sub>f</sub> variations. The initial “injection” phase conforms to Darcy's law and is amenable to mathematical description. The foam with FER of 15 has the maximum viscosity and, hence the <em>L</em><sub>f</sub> and permeability in the penetration tests with FER of 15 are the lowest in the same sand. The bubble size distribution of foam with different FER shows minor differences. Nevertheless, the characteristics of foam penetration vary due to the distinct particle size distribution (PSD) of different sands. Foam penetration creates low-permeability layers in both medium and fine sands due to the larger bubble size of the foam compared to the estimated pore sizes of medium and fine sands. While the coarse sand results in a different situation due to its large pore size. The distinctive characteristics of foam penetration in different sand strata are notably shaped by FER, PSD, and pore size distributions. These insights shed light on the complex interactions during foam penetration at the tunnel face, contributing valuable knowledge to EPB shield tunnelling practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48505,"journal":{"name":"Underground Space","volume":"17 ","pages":"Pages 170-187"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424000102/pdfft?md5=5a8d9931deede5023b95b89cf5426b14&pid=1-s2.0-S2467967424000102-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanism analysis of foam penetration in EPB shield tunnelling with a focus on FER and soil particle size\",\"authors\":\"He Huang ,&nbsp;Quan Sun ,&nbsp;Tao Xu ,&nbsp;Wanhuan Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.undsp.2023.11.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Parameters of foam penetration in earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunnelling, such as permeability coefficients and penetration distances, significantly impact tunnel face stability. However, existing studies have faced inaccuracies in analysing these parameters due to imitations in experimental methods. This study addresses this issue by employing enhanced methods for a more precise analysis of foam penetration. Experiments involving three distinct sand types (coarse, medium, and fine) and three foam expansion ratios (FER) (10, 15, and 20) are conducted using a modified model test setup. Benefiting from a novel computer vision-based method, the model test outcomes unveil two distinct foam penetration paths: liquid migration (<em>L</em><sub>w</sub>) and bubble migration (<em>L</em><sub>f</sub>). Three penetration phases — namely, injection, blockage &amp; drainage, and breakage — are identified based on <em>L</em><sub>w</sub> and <em>L</em><sub>f</sub> variations. The initial “injection” phase conforms to Darcy's law and is amenable to mathematical description. The foam with FER of 15 has the maximum viscosity and, hence the <em>L</em><sub>f</sub> and permeability in the penetration tests with FER of 15 are the lowest in the same sand. The bubble size distribution of foam with different FER shows minor differences. Nevertheless, the characteristics of foam penetration vary due to the distinct particle size distribution (PSD) of different sands. Foam penetration creates low-permeability layers in both medium and fine sands due to the larger bubble size of the foam compared to the estimated pore sizes of medium and fine sands. While the coarse sand results in a different situation due to its large pore size. The distinctive characteristics of foam penetration in different sand strata are notably shaped by FER, PSD, and pore size distributions. These insights shed light on the complex interactions during foam penetration at the tunnel face, contributing valuable knowledge to EPB shield tunnelling practices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Underground Space\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 170-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424000102/pdfft?md5=5a8d9931deede5023b95b89cf5426b14&pid=1-s2.0-S2467967424000102-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Underground Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424000102\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Underground Space","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424000102","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土压平衡(EPB)盾构隧道中的泡沫渗透参数,如渗透系数和渗透距离,对隧道面的稳定性有重大影响。然而,由于实验方法的缺陷,现有研究在分析这些参数时存在误差。本研究针对这一问题,采用了更精确的泡沫渗透分析方法。实验涉及三种不同类型的砂(粗砂、中砂和细砂)和三种泡沫膨胀率(FER)(10、15 和 20),使用的是经过改进的模型试验装置。利用基于计算机视觉的新方法,模型试验结果揭示了两种不同的泡沫渗透路径:液体迁移(Lw)和气泡迁移(Lf)。根据 Lw 和 Lf 的变化,确定了三个渗透阶段,即注入、堵塞和amp;排水和破裂。最初的 "注入 "阶段符合达西定律,可以用数学方法描述。FER 为 15 的泡沫粘度最大,因此,在同一砂中,FER 为 15 的渗透试验中 Lf 和渗透率最低。不同 FER 的泡沫的气泡大小分布略有不同。然而,由于不同砂的粒径分布(PSD)不同,泡沫渗透的特征也不同。与中砂和细砂的估计孔隙尺寸相比,泡沫的气泡尺寸更大,因此泡沫渗透会在中砂和细砂中形成低渗透层。而粗砂由于孔隙较大,情况有所不同。泡沫在不同砂层中渗透的不同特征主要由 FER、PSD 和孔径分布决定。这些见解揭示了泡沫在隧道面渗透过程中的复杂相互作用,为 EPB 盾构隧道实践提供了宝贵的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanism analysis of foam penetration in EPB shield tunnelling with a focus on FER and soil particle size

Parameters of foam penetration in earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunnelling, such as permeability coefficients and penetration distances, significantly impact tunnel face stability. However, existing studies have faced inaccuracies in analysing these parameters due to imitations in experimental methods. This study addresses this issue by employing enhanced methods for a more precise analysis of foam penetration. Experiments involving three distinct sand types (coarse, medium, and fine) and three foam expansion ratios (FER) (10, 15, and 20) are conducted using a modified model test setup. Benefiting from a novel computer vision-based method, the model test outcomes unveil two distinct foam penetration paths: liquid migration (Lw) and bubble migration (Lf). Three penetration phases — namely, injection, blockage & drainage, and breakage — are identified based on Lw and Lf variations. The initial “injection” phase conforms to Darcy's law and is amenable to mathematical description. The foam with FER of 15 has the maximum viscosity and, hence the Lf and permeability in the penetration tests with FER of 15 are the lowest in the same sand. The bubble size distribution of foam with different FER shows minor differences. Nevertheless, the characteristics of foam penetration vary due to the distinct particle size distribution (PSD) of different sands. Foam penetration creates low-permeability layers in both medium and fine sands due to the larger bubble size of the foam compared to the estimated pore sizes of medium and fine sands. While the coarse sand results in a different situation due to its large pore size. The distinctive characteristics of foam penetration in different sand strata are notably shaped by FER, PSD, and pore size distributions. These insights shed light on the complex interactions during foam penetration at the tunnel face, contributing valuable knowledge to EPB shield tunnelling practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Underground Space
Underground Space ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Underground Space is an open access international journal without article processing charges (APC) committed to serving as a scientific forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of underground engineering. The journal welcomes manuscripts that deal with original theories, methods, technologies, and important applications throughout the life-cycle of underground projects, including planning, design, operation and maintenance, disaster prevention, and demolition. The journal is particularly interested in manuscripts related to the latest development of smart underground engineering from the perspectives of resilience, resources saving, environmental friendliness, humanity, and artificial intelligence. The manuscripts are expected to have significant innovation and potential impact in the field of underground engineering, and should have clear association with or application in underground projects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信