虚拟智囊团 "在制定合作领导倡议计划("CLIPs")方面取得的成果

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Whitney D. Maxwell , Kerry K. Fierke , Gregory M. Zumach
{"title":"虚拟智囊团 \"在制定合作领导倡议计划(\"CLIPs\")方面取得的成果","authors":"Whitney D. Maxwell ,&nbsp;Kerry K. Fierke ,&nbsp;Gregory M. Zumach","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Goal</h3><p>The American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Leadership Development Special Interest Group (LD SIG) held a one-hour “Virtual Think Tank” (VTT) interactive session in 2020 for pharmacy educators interested in leadership development. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative outcomes of this VTT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>VTT attendees worked together in small groups created based on pre-selected common interest areas related to leadership development to create collaborative leadership initiative plans (CLIPs), which were ideas for new collaborative scholarly or programmatic initiatives.</p></div><div><h3>Principal findings</h3><p>Quantitative outcomes of this VTT included statistically significant increases in positive perceptions toward the organization hosting the VTT regarding networking, scholarly collaboration, educational collaboration, and professional service opportunities, as well as significant improvements in attitudes regarding engagement with the sponsoring organization. Additionally, 18.4% of VTT attendees continued communicating with CLIP groups post-VTT and 13.2% of respondents indicated that they successfully implemented the CLIP ideas that were generated during the VTT. Qualitative outcomes included findings that the two most commonly encountered barriers were insufficient traction of the initial idea and lack of time (41.9% (<em>n</em> = 13) for both). Other barriers included lack of alignment with priorities at 12.9% (<em>n</em> = 4).</p></div><div><h3>Practical applications</h3><p>This leadership VTT for pharmacy academicians led to development and implementation of important scholarly and programmatic outcomes, and fostered cross-institutional partnerships. Findings from this study evaluating a VTT provide a framework of expectations for other organizations seeking to implement a similar initiative.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000040/pdfft?md5=83f942b52ec4d67e2b832332639fd2e4&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000040-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of a “virtual think tank” to establish collaborative leadership initiative plans (“CLIPs”)\",\"authors\":\"Whitney D. Maxwell ,&nbsp;Kerry K. Fierke ,&nbsp;Gregory M. Zumach\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Goal</h3><p>The American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Leadership Development Special Interest Group (LD SIG) held a one-hour “Virtual Think Tank” (VTT) interactive session in 2020 for pharmacy educators interested in leadership development. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative outcomes of this VTT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>VTT attendees worked together in small groups created based on pre-selected common interest areas related to leadership development to create collaborative leadership initiative plans (CLIPs), which were ideas for new collaborative scholarly or programmatic initiatives.</p></div><div><h3>Principal findings</h3><p>Quantitative outcomes of this VTT included statistically significant increases in positive perceptions toward the organization hosting the VTT regarding networking, scholarly collaboration, educational collaboration, and professional service opportunities, as well as significant improvements in attitudes regarding engagement with the sponsoring organization. Additionally, 18.4% of VTT attendees continued communicating with CLIP groups post-VTT and 13.2% of respondents indicated that they successfully implemented the CLIP ideas that were generated during the VTT. Qualitative outcomes included findings that the two most commonly encountered barriers were insufficient traction of the initial idea and lack of time (41.9% (<em>n</em> = 13) for both). Other barriers included lack of alignment with priorities at 12.9% (<em>n</em> = 4).</p></div><div><h3>Practical applications</h3><p>This leadership VTT for pharmacy academicians led to development and implementation of important scholarly and programmatic outcomes, and fostered cross-institutional partnerships. Findings from this study evaluating a VTT provide a framework of expectations for other organizations seeking to implement a similar initiative.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000040/pdfft?md5=83f942b52ec4d67e2b832332639fd2e4&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000040-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标美国药学院协会(AACP)领导力发展特别兴趣小组(LD SIG)于 2020 年为对领导力发展感兴趣的药学教育工作者举办了一个小时的 "虚拟智囊团"(VTT)互动会议。本研究的目的是评估此次虚拟智囊团的定量和定性成果。方法虚拟智囊团的参与者根据预先选定的与领导力发展相关的共同兴趣领域组成小组,共同制定合作领导力计划(CLIP),即新的合作学术或项目计划的想法。主要研究结果这次 VTT 的定量研究结果包括:对主办 VTT 的组织在人际网络、学术合作、教育合作和专业服务机会方面的积极看法有了统计学意义上的显著提高,对主办组织的参与态度也有了显著改善。此外,18.4% 的 VTT 参加者在 VTT 结束后继续与 CLIP 小组交流,13.2% 的受访者表示他们成功实施了在 VTT 期间产生的 CLIP 创意。定性结果包括:发现最常遇到的两个障碍是最初的想法吸引力不足和缺乏时间(两者均为 41.9%(n = 13))。实际应用这项针对药剂学院士的领导力 VTT 研发和实施了重要的学术和项目成果,并促进了跨机构合作。本研究对 VTT 的评估结果为其他寻求实施类似计划的组织提供了一个期望框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of a “virtual think tank” to establish collaborative leadership initiative plans (“CLIPs”)

Goal

The American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Leadership Development Special Interest Group (LD SIG) held a one-hour “Virtual Think Tank” (VTT) interactive session in 2020 for pharmacy educators interested in leadership development. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative outcomes of this VTT.

Methods

VTT attendees worked together in small groups created based on pre-selected common interest areas related to leadership development to create collaborative leadership initiative plans (CLIPs), which were ideas for new collaborative scholarly or programmatic initiatives.

Principal findings

Quantitative outcomes of this VTT included statistically significant increases in positive perceptions toward the organization hosting the VTT regarding networking, scholarly collaboration, educational collaboration, and professional service opportunities, as well as significant improvements in attitudes regarding engagement with the sponsoring organization. Additionally, 18.4% of VTT attendees continued communicating with CLIP groups post-VTT and 13.2% of respondents indicated that they successfully implemented the CLIP ideas that were generated during the VTT. Qualitative outcomes included findings that the two most commonly encountered barriers were insufficient traction of the initial idea and lack of time (41.9% (n = 13) for both). Other barriers included lack of alignment with priorities at 12.9% (n = 4).

Practical applications

This leadership VTT for pharmacy academicians led to development and implementation of important scholarly and programmatic outcomes, and fostered cross-institutional partnerships. Findings from this study evaluating a VTT provide a framework of expectations for other organizations seeking to implement a similar initiative.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信