YouTube 作为血管外科患者和受训人员教育的来源:系统回顾

IF 1.4 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Arshia Javidan , Muralie Vignarajah , Matthew W. Nelms , Fangwen Zhou , Yung Lee , Faysal Naji , Ahmed Kayssi
{"title":"YouTube 作为血管外科患者和受训人员教育的来源:系统回顾","authors":"Arshia Javidan ,&nbsp;Muralie Vignarajah ,&nbsp;Matthew W. Nelms ,&nbsp;Fangwen Zhou ,&nbsp;Yung Lee ,&nbsp;Faysal Naji ,&nbsp;Ahmed Kayssi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.01.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Due to its video based approach, YouTube has become a widely accessed educational resource for patients and trainees. This systematic review characterised and evaluated the peer reviewed literature investigating YouTube as a source of patient or trainee education in vascular surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Ovid HealthStar from inception until 19 January 2023. All primary studies and conference abstracts evaluating YouTube as a source of vascular surgery education were included.</p></div><div><h3>Review methods</h3><p>Video educational quality was analysed across several factors, including pathology, video audience, and length.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 24 studies were identified examining 3 221 videos with 123.1 hours of content and 37.1 million views. Studies primarily examined YouTube videos on diabetic foot care (7/24, 29%), peripheral arterial disease (3/24, 13%), carotid artery stenosis (3/24, 13%), varicose veins (3/24, 13%), and abdominal aortic aneurysm (2/24, 8%). Video educational quality was analysed using standardised assessment tools, author generated scoring systems, or global author reported assessment of quality. Six studies assessed videos for trainee education, while 18 studies evaluated videos for patient education. Among the 20 studies which reported on the overall quality of educational content, 10/20 studies deemed it poor, and 10/20 studies considered it fair, with 53% of studies noting poor educational quality for videos intended for patients and 40% of studies noting poor educational quality in videos intended for trainees. Poor quality videos had more views than fair quality videos (mean 27 348, 95% CI 15 154–39 543 views <em>vs.</em> 11 372, 95% CI 3 115–19 629 views, <em>p</em> = .030).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The overall educational quality of YouTube videos for vascular surgery patient and trainee education is suboptimal. There is significant heterogeneity in the quality assessment tools used in their evaluation. A standardised approach to online education with a consistent quality assessment tool is required to better support online patient and trainee education in vascular surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36502,"journal":{"name":"EJVES Vascular Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X24000558/pdfft?md5=cf93b94fb75ababa525384f5cd25e1f5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666688X24000558-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"YouTube as a Source of Patient and Trainee Education in Vascular Surgery: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Arshia Javidan ,&nbsp;Muralie Vignarajah ,&nbsp;Matthew W. Nelms ,&nbsp;Fangwen Zhou ,&nbsp;Yung Lee ,&nbsp;Faysal Naji ,&nbsp;Ahmed Kayssi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.01.054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Due to its video based approach, YouTube has become a widely accessed educational resource for patients and trainees. This systematic review characterised and evaluated the peer reviewed literature investigating YouTube as a source of patient or trainee education in vascular surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Ovid HealthStar from inception until 19 January 2023. All primary studies and conference abstracts evaluating YouTube as a source of vascular surgery education were included.</p></div><div><h3>Review methods</h3><p>Video educational quality was analysed across several factors, including pathology, video audience, and length.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 24 studies were identified examining 3 221 videos with 123.1 hours of content and 37.1 million views. Studies primarily examined YouTube videos on diabetic foot care (7/24, 29%), peripheral arterial disease (3/24, 13%), carotid artery stenosis (3/24, 13%), varicose veins (3/24, 13%), and abdominal aortic aneurysm (2/24, 8%). Video educational quality was analysed using standardised assessment tools, author generated scoring systems, or global author reported assessment of quality. Six studies assessed videos for trainee education, while 18 studies evaluated videos for patient education. Among the 20 studies which reported on the overall quality of educational content, 10/20 studies deemed it poor, and 10/20 studies considered it fair, with 53% of studies noting poor educational quality for videos intended for patients and 40% of studies noting poor educational quality in videos intended for trainees. Poor quality videos had more views than fair quality videos (mean 27 348, 95% CI 15 154–39 543 views <em>vs.</em> 11 372, 95% CI 3 115–19 629 views, <em>p</em> = .030).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The overall educational quality of YouTube videos for vascular surgery patient and trainee education is suboptimal. There is significant heterogeneity in the quality assessment tools used in their evaluation. A standardised approach to online education with a consistent quality assessment tool is required to better support online patient and trainee education in vascular surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJVES Vascular Forum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X24000558/pdfft?md5=cf93b94fb75ababa525384f5cd25e1f5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666688X24000558-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJVES Vascular Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X24000558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJVES Vascular Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X24000558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的YouTube以视频为基础,已成为患者和受训者广泛访问的教育资源。本系统性综述对研究 YouTube 作为血管外科患者或受训者教育资源的同行评议文献进行了特征描述和评估。数据来源使用 EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 Ovid HealthStar 对从开始到 2023 年 1 月 19 日的文献进行了全面检索。所有评估 YouTube 作为血管外科教育来源的主要研究和会议摘要均被纳入其中。综述方法根据病理学、视频受众和视频长度等多个因素对视频教育质量进行分析。结果总计确定了 24 项研究,共审查了 3 221 个视频,内容长达 123.1 小时,浏览次数达 3710 万次。研究主要考察了 YouTube 上有关糖尿病足护理(7/24,29%)、外周动脉疾病(3/24,13%)、颈动脉狭窄(3/24,13%)、静脉曲张(3/24,13%)和腹主动脉瘤(2/24,8%)的视频。视频教学质量采用标准化评估工具、作者生成的评分系统或作者报告的总体质量评估进行分析。有 6 项研究对受训者教育视频进行了评估,有 18 项研究对患者教育视频进行了评估。在报告了教育内容总体质量的 20 项研究中,10/20 的研究认为教育内容质量较差,10/20 的研究认为教育内容质量尚可,其中 53% 的研究指出面向患者的视频教育质量较差,40% 的研究指出面向学员的视频教育质量较差。质量差的视频比质量一般的视频有更多的浏览量(平均 27 348 次,95% CI 15 154-39 543 次 vs. 11 372 次,95% CI 3 115-19 629 次,p = .030)。结论YouTube视频用于血管外科患者和受训者教育的总体教育质量不尽如人意,其评估中使用的质量评估工具也存在明显的异质性。为了更好地支持血管外科患者和受训人员的在线教育,需要一种标准化的在线教育方法和一致的质量评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
YouTube as a Source of Patient and Trainee Education in Vascular Surgery: A Systematic Review

Objective

Due to its video based approach, YouTube has become a widely accessed educational resource for patients and trainees. This systematic review characterised and evaluated the peer reviewed literature investigating YouTube as a source of patient or trainee education in vascular surgery.

Data sources

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Ovid HealthStar from inception until 19 January 2023. All primary studies and conference abstracts evaluating YouTube as a source of vascular surgery education were included.

Review methods

Video educational quality was analysed across several factors, including pathology, video audience, and length.

Results

Overall, 24 studies were identified examining 3 221 videos with 123.1 hours of content and 37.1 million views. Studies primarily examined YouTube videos on diabetic foot care (7/24, 29%), peripheral arterial disease (3/24, 13%), carotid artery stenosis (3/24, 13%), varicose veins (3/24, 13%), and abdominal aortic aneurysm (2/24, 8%). Video educational quality was analysed using standardised assessment tools, author generated scoring systems, or global author reported assessment of quality. Six studies assessed videos for trainee education, while 18 studies evaluated videos for patient education. Among the 20 studies which reported on the overall quality of educational content, 10/20 studies deemed it poor, and 10/20 studies considered it fair, with 53% of studies noting poor educational quality for videos intended for patients and 40% of studies noting poor educational quality in videos intended for trainees. Poor quality videos had more views than fair quality videos (mean 27 348, 95% CI 15 154–39 543 views vs. 11 372, 95% CI 3 115–19 629 views, p = .030).

Conclusion

The overall educational quality of YouTube videos for vascular surgery patient and trainee education is suboptimal. There is significant heterogeneity in the quality assessment tools used in their evaluation. A standardised approach to online education with a consistent quality assessment tool is required to better support online patient and trainee education in vascular surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EJVES Vascular Forum
EJVES Vascular Forum Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
102 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信