Renming Liu , Min He , Xuewei Zhao , Mengmeng Sun , Jiazhen Cao , Xinyue Wang , Xingbang Wang , Shuming Zhao , Fuchun Wang , Tie Li
{"title":"刺激单个穴位和组合穴位对糖尿病胃痉挛的影响：随机对照试验研究","authors":"Renming Liu , Min He , Xuewei Zhao , Mengmeng Sun , Jiazhen Cao , Xinyue Wang , Xingbang Wang , Shuming Zhao , Fuchun Wang , Tie Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcme.2024.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aim</h3><p>The most effective among the acupoints remains to be determined for treating diabetic gastroparesis (DGP). This study aimed to compare single and combination acupoints for their effectiveness in DGP.</p></div><div><h3>Experimental procedure</h3><p>A prospective, patient-assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial was designed to compare the efficacy of 8-week acupuncture at a single acupoint (Zhongwan, CV-12), combination acupoints (Zhongwan, CV-12 and Zusanli, ST-36), and a sham-acupoint, in 99 adults with DGP. The primary clinical outcome was measured using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), while barium meal examination, fasting plasma glucose, the 2-h plasma glucose, short-form health survey (SF-36), and GCSI subscales were performed for evaluating secondary clinical outcomes. These results were analysed by two factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, Chi-Square, Fisher Exact, Kruskal–Wallis tests and Tukey's Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After randomization, 97 patients completed the study. GCSI scores of all groups decreased during both post-treatment and the follow-up period, they were statistically significant compared to the baseline period (<em>p</em> < 0.01), but there was no significant difference among the groups (<em>p</em> > 0.05) during the post-treatment period. GCSI scores improved more in the combination acupoints group than in the single acupoint group which was better than the sham group after treatment. During the follow-up period, the same trend was observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Among patients with DGP, the combination acupoints were more beneficial compared with single and sham acupoints.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration number</h3><p>NCT02452489.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17449,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine","volume":"14 4","pages":"Pages 446-455"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225411024000087/pdfft?md5=2dd43bff8074cfa32227d692779c7b07&pid=1-s2.0-S2225411024000087-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of stimulating single acupoint and combination acupoints on diabetic gastroparesis: A randomised controlled trial study\",\"authors\":\"Renming Liu , Min He , Xuewei Zhao , Mengmeng Sun , Jiazhen Cao , Xinyue Wang , Xingbang Wang , Shuming Zhao , Fuchun Wang , Tie Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtcme.2024.01.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and aim</h3><p>The most effective among the acupoints remains to be determined for treating diabetic gastroparesis (DGP). This study aimed to compare single and combination acupoints for their effectiveness in DGP.</p></div><div><h3>Experimental procedure</h3><p>A prospective, patient-assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial was designed to compare the efficacy of 8-week acupuncture at a single acupoint (Zhongwan, CV-12), combination acupoints (Zhongwan, CV-12 and Zusanli, ST-36), and a sham-acupoint, in 99 adults with DGP. The primary clinical outcome was measured using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), while barium meal examination, fasting plasma glucose, the 2-h plasma glucose, short-form health survey (SF-36), and GCSI subscales were performed for evaluating secondary clinical outcomes. These results were analysed by two factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, Chi-Square, Fisher Exact, Kruskal–Wallis tests and Tukey's Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After randomization, 97 patients completed the study. GCSI scores of all groups decreased during both post-treatment and the follow-up period, they were statistically significant compared to the baseline period (<em>p</em> < 0.01), but there was no significant difference among the groups (<em>p</em> > 0.05) during the post-treatment period. GCSI scores improved more in the combination acupoints group than in the single acupoint group which was better than the sham group after treatment. During the follow-up period, the same trend was observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Among patients with DGP, the combination acupoints were more beneficial compared with single and sham acupoints.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration number</h3><p>NCT02452489.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 446-455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225411024000087/pdfft?md5=2dd43bff8074cfa32227d692779c7b07&pid=1-s2.0-S2225411024000087-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225411024000087\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225411024000087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of stimulating single acupoint and combination acupoints on diabetic gastroparesis: A randomised controlled trial study
Background and aim
The most effective among the acupoints remains to be determined for treating diabetic gastroparesis (DGP). This study aimed to compare single and combination acupoints for their effectiveness in DGP.
Experimental procedure
A prospective, patient-assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial was designed to compare the efficacy of 8-week acupuncture at a single acupoint (Zhongwan, CV-12), combination acupoints (Zhongwan, CV-12 and Zusanli, ST-36), and a sham-acupoint, in 99 adults with DGP. The primary clinical outcome was measured using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), while barium meal examination, fasting plasma glucose, the 2-h plasma glucose, short-form health survey (SF-36), and GCSI subscales were performed for evaluating secondary clinical outcomes. These results were analysed by two factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, Chi-Square, Fisher Exact, Kruskal–Wallis tests and Tukey's Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test.
Results
After randomization, 97 patients completed the study. GCSI scores of all groups decreased during both post-treatment and the follow-up period, they were statistically significant compared to the baseline period (p < 0.01), but there was no significant difference among the groups (p > 0.05) during the post-treatment period. GCSI scores improved more in the combination acupoints group than in the single acupoint group which was better than the sham group after treatment. During the follow-up period, the same trend was observed.
Conclusions
Among patients with DGP, the combination acupoints were more beneficial compared with single and sham acupoints.
期刊介绍：
eJTCM is committed to publish research providing the biological and clinical grounds for using Traditional and Complementary Medical treatments as well as studies that demonstrate the pathophysiological and molecular/biochemical bases supporting the effectiveness of such treatments. Review articles are by invitation only.
eJTCM is receiving an increasing amount of submission, and we need to adopt more stringent criteria to select the articles that can be considered for peer review. Note that eJTCM is striving to increase the quality and medical relevance of the publications.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
