中东/北非淀粉样变性成像实践评估(PYP-MENA)

Firas Al Badarin, Masoud Garashi, A. Aljizeeri, R. Tabbalat, Adel Allam, Salah Eddine Bouyoucef, Ammar Chauhdary
{"title":"中东/北非淀粉样变性成像实践评估(PYP-MENA)","authors":"Firas Al Badarin, Masoud Garashi, A. Aljizeeri, R. Tabbalat, Adel Allam, Salah Eddine Bouyoucef, Ammar Chauhdary","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyad025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Whereas recommendations to optimize performance and yield of cardiac scintigraphy studies with bone-seeking tracers have been published, little is known about real-world adherence to these best practices, especially outside North America and Europe. Accordingly, we described imaging practices with this modality in a sample of nuclear laboratories in the Middle East/North Africa (MENA) region.\n \n \n \n Laboratories performing radionuclide imaging for cardiac amyloidosis in the MENA region were invited to participate in this study to describe installed camera systems, type and dose of bone-avid tracers used, imaging protocols, and criteria used for study interpretation. Out of 19 invited sites, 10 completed the survey (70% government-run; 90% accredited), sites have been involved with amyloid imaging for a median of 49 months (interquartile range 24–60). The median injected dose was 20 mCi (range 10–25), and PYP was used by 90% of sites in this sample. Planar imaging with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) reconstruction was performed at all sites, including seven sites that performed SPECT/CT reconstruction. Lastly, only 50% of sites relied on evidence of myocardial uptake by SPECT to confirm the diagnosis of ATTR cardiomyopathy, while the rest relied on visual assessment and heart/contralateral ratio.\n \n \n \n This study is the first to describe variation in imaging practices across sites in the MENA region, especially in acquisition protocols and interpretation standards. Eliminating heterogeneities identified by this study will harmonize image interpretation and reporting and will facilitate successful conduct of regional multi-centre studies.\n","PeriodicalId":508944,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appraisal of amyloidosis imaging practices in the Middle East/North Africa (PYP-MENA)\",\"authors\":\"Firas Al Badarin, Masoud Garashi, A. Aljizeeri, R. Tabbalat, Adel Allam, Salah Eddine Bouyoucef, Ammar Chauhdary\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjimp/qyad025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Whereas recommendations to optimize performance and yield of cardiac scintigraphy studies with bone-seeking tracers have been published, little is known about real-world adherence to these best practices, especially outside North America and Europe. Accordingly, we described imaging practices with this modality in a sample of nuclear laboratories in the Middle East/North Africa (MENA) region.\\n \\n \\n \\n Laboratories performing radionuclide imaging for cardiac amyloidosis in the MENA region were invited to participate in this study to describe installed camera systems, type and dose of bone-avid tracers used, imaging protocols, and criteria used for study interpretation. Out of 19 invited sites, 10 completed the survey (70% government-run; 90% accredited), sites have been involved with amyloid imaging for a median of 49 months (interquartile range 24–60). The median injected dose was 20 mCi (range 10–25), and PYP was used by 90% of sites in this sample. Planar imaging with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) reconstruction was performed at all sites, including seven sites that performed SPECT/CT reconstruction. Lastly, only 50% of sites relied on evidence of myocardial uptake by SPECT to confirm the diagnosis of ATTR cardiomyopathy, while the rest relied on visual assessment and heart/contralateral ratio.\\n \\n \\n \\n This study is the first to describe variation in imaging practices across sites in the MENA region, especially in acquisition protocols and interpretation standards. Eliminating heterogeneities identified by this study will harmonize image interpretation and reporting and will facilitate successful conduct of regional multi-centre studies.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":508944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyad025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyad025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然已经发布了使用骨寻迹剂优化心脏闪烁成像研究的性能和产量的建议,但人们对这些最佳实践在现实世界中的遵守情况却知之甚少,尤其是在北美和欧洲以外的地区。因此,我们对中东/北非地区(MENA)的核实验室进行了抽样调查,以了解他们对这种成像方式的实践情况。 我们邀请中东和北非地区进行心脏淀粉样变性放射性核素成像的实验室参与这项研究,以描述所安装的摄像系统、所使用的骨惰性示踪剂的类型和剂量、成像方案以及用于研究解释的标准。在 19 家受邀医疗机构中,有 10 家完成了调查(70% 由政府运营;90% 经过认证),这些医疗机构参与淀粉样蛋白成像的时间中位数为 49 个月(四分位数区间为 24-60 个月)。中位注射剂量为 20 mCi(10-25 mCi 不等),90% 的样本研究机构使用PYP。所有研究机构都进行了单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)重建平面成像,其中有 7 家研究机构进行了 SPECT/CT 重建。最后,只有50%的研究机构依靠SPECT的心肌摄取证据来确诊ATTR心肌病,而其他研究机构则依靠视觉评估和心脏/对侧比值来确诊。 这项研究首次描述了中东和北非地区各医疗机构在成像方法上的差异,尤其是在采集方案和判读标准上的差异。消除这项研究发现的异质性将统一图像解读和报告,有助于成功开展地区性多中心研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Appraisal of amyloidosis imaging practices in the Middle East/North Africa (PYP-MENA)
Whereas recommendations to optimize performance and yield of cardiac scintigraphy studies with bone-seeking tracers have been published, little is known about real-world adherence to these best practices, especially outside North America and Europe. Accordingly, we described imaging practices with this modality in a sample of nuclear laboratories in the Middle East/North Africa (MENA) region. Laboratories performing radionuclide imaging for cardiac amyloidosis in the MENA region were invited to participate in this study to describe installed camera systems, type and dose of bone-avid tracers used, imaging protocols, and criteria used for study interpretation. Out of 19 invited sites, 10 completed the survey (70% government-run; 90% accredited), sites have been involved with amyloid imaging for a median of 49 months (interquartile range 24–60). The median injected dose was 20 mCi (range 10–25), and PYP was used by 90% of sites in this sample. Planar imaging with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) reconstruction was performed at all sites, including seven sites that performed SPECT/CT reconstruction. Lastly, only 50% of sites relied on evidence of myocardial uptake by SPECT to confirm the diagnosis of ATTR cardiomyopathy, while the rest relied on visual assessment and heart/contralateral ratio. This study is the first to describe variation in imaging practices across sites in the MENA region, especially in acquisition protocols and interpretation standards. Eliminating heterogeneities identified by this study will harmonize image interpretation and reporting and will facilitate successful conduct of regional multi-centre studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信