{"title":"三维平视显示器对玻璃体视网膜手术中手术性能、人体工程学和教学的影响:首个非洲研究","authors":"Yassine Malek , Youssef Abdelmassih , Omar Moustaine , Shamil Louaya","doi":"10.1016/j.jfop.2024.100079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess the impact of a Three-Dimensional (3D) Heads-Up Display (HUD) compared to a conventional microscope (COVM) on surgical performance, ergonomics, and teaching in vitreoretinal (VR) surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A single-center, retrospective cohort study and cross-sectional survey.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Surgical assistants (N = 12) and Vitreoretinal Surgeons (N = 2) were asked, in the survey arm, to complete a questionnaire regarding various parameters related to ergonomics, quality of visualization, quality of teaching, and overall satisfaction. Parameters were rated on a scale from 1 to 10 for both the 3DHUD and COVM visualization systems (VS). The scores of the two groups were compared using appropriate statistical tests. The retrospective arm of the study included 34 consecutive cases that underwent vitrectomy with the 3DHUD VS compared to 32 matched controls with the COVM. Demographics and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical parameters were identified in both groups and were compared using appropriate statistical tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Survey scores were significantly higher in the 3DHUD VS group when compared to the COVM VS group for both Surgeons and Assistants regarding ergonomic parameters (overall comfort (p < 0.001), neck pain (p < 0.001), and lower back pain (p < 0.001)), visualization parameters (overall visibility (p < 0.001), visibility of the macula (p < 0.001), depth of field (p < 0.001), and quality of magnification (p < 0.001)) and teaching parameters (understanding of surgical steps by assistants (p < 0.001) and teaching to medical students and residents (p < 0.001)). Both demographics and clinical data of cases operated with the 3DHUD VS and COVM VS were comparable (p > 0.05). Anatomical and functional outcomes were similar in both groups (p > 0.05); nevertheless, mean surgical time was significantly longer in the 3DHUD group for tractional retinal detachments (p < 0.001), epiretinal membranes, and phacofragmentation (p = 0.03).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>3DHUD greatly enhances ergonomics during vitreoretinal surgery and represents a significant innovation in the teaching armamentarium within the operating room. It provides the same surgical view for both the surgeons and assistants with an unparalleled image quality. A learning curve and an integrated ecosystem may be necessary to maximize its potential and reduce surgical time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100740,"journal":{"name":"JFO Open Ophthalmology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100079"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949889924000035/pdfft?md5=ed6feb9942c733e22301d8c1ad203172&pid=1-s2.0-S2949889924000035-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of three-dimensional heads-up display on surgical performance, ergonomics and teaching in vitreoretinal surgery: first African study\",\"authors\":\"Yassine Malek , Youssef Abdelmassih , Omar Moustaine , Shamil Louaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfop.2024.100079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess the impact of a Three-Dimensional (3D) Heads-Up Display (HUD) compared to a conventional microscope (COVM) on surgical performance, ergonomics, and teaching in vitreoretinal (VR) surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A single-center, retrospective cohort study and cross-sectional survey.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Surgical assistants (N = 12) and Vitreoretinal Surgeons (N = 2) were asked, in the survey arm, to complete a questionnaire regarding various parameters related to ergonomics, quality of visualization, quality of teaching, and overall satisfaction. Parameters were rated on a scale from 1 to 10 for both the 3DHUD and COVM visualization systems (VS). The scores of the two groups were compared using appropriate statistical tests. The retrospective arm of the study included 34 consecutive cases that underwent vitrectomy with the 3DHUD VS compared to 32 matched controls with the COVM. Demographics and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical parameters were identified in both groups and were compared using appropriate statistical tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Survey scores were significantly higher in the 3DHUD VS group when compared to the COVM VS group for both Surgeons and Assistants regarding ergonomic parameters (overall comfort (p < 0.001), neck pain (p < 0.001), and lower back pain (p < 0.001)), visualization parameters (overall visibility (p < 0.001), visibility of the macula (p < 0.001), depth of field (p < 0.001), and quality of magnification (p < 0.001)) and teaching parameters (understanding of surgical steps by assistants (p < 0.001) and teaching to medical students and residents (p < 0.001)). Both demographics and clinical data of cases operated with the 3DHUD VS and COVM VS were comparable (p > 0.05). Anatomical and functional outcomes were similar in both groups (p > 0.05); nevertheless, mean surgical time was significantly longer in the 3DHUD group for tractional retinal detachments (p < 0.001), epiretinal membranes, and phacofragmentation (p = 0.03).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>3DHUD greatly enhances ergonomics during vitreoretinal surgery and represents a significant innovation in the teaching armamentarium within the operating room. It provides the same surgical view for both the surgeons and assistants with an unparalleled image quality. A learning curve and an integrated ecosystem may be necessary to maximize its potential and reduce surgical time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JFO Open Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949889924000035/pdfft?md5=ed6feb9942c733e22301d8c1ad203172&pid=1-s2.0-S2949889924000035-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JFO Open Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949889924000035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JFO Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949889924000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估三维(3D)平视显示器(HUD)与传统显微镜(COVM)相比对玻璃体视网膜(VR)手术中的手术表现、人体工程学和教学的影响。方法在调查组中,要求手术助手(12 人)和玻璃体视网膜外科医生(2 人)填写一份调查问卷,内容涉及与人体工程学、视觉质量、教学质量和总体满意度相关的各种参数。3DHUD和COVM可视化系统(VS)的各项参数均按1至10分进行评分。通过适当的统计检验对两组的得分进行比较。回顾性研究包括 34 例使用 3DHUD VS 进行玻璃体切除术的连续病例与 32 例使用 COVM 的匹配对照组。结果与 COVM VS 组相比,3DHUD VS 组的外科医生和助手在人体工程学参数(总体舒适度(p < 0.001)、颈部疼痛(p < 0.001)和下背部疼痛(p <;0.001))、可视化参数(整体可视性(p <;0.001)、黄斑可视性(p <;0.001)、景深(p <;0.001)和放大质量(p <;0.001))和教学参数(助手对手术步骤的理解(p <;0.001)以及对医学生和住院医师的教学(p <;0.001))。使用 3DHUD VS 和 COVM VS 手术病例的人口统计学和临床数据具有可比性(p > 0.05)。两组的解剖和功能结果相似(p > 0.05);但在牵引性视网膜脱离(p < 0.001)、视网膜外膜和 phacofragmentation(p = 0.03)方面,3DHUD 组的平均手术时间明显长于 COVM VS 组。它为外科医生和助手提供了相同的手术视野,图像质量无与伦比。要最大限度地发挥其潜力并缩短手术时间,可能需要一个学习曲线和一个综合生态系统。
Impact of three-dimensional heads-up display on surgical performance, ergonomics and teaching in vitreoretinal surgery: first African study
Purpose
To assess the impact of a Three-Dimensional (3D) Heads-Up Display (HUD) compared to a conventional microscope (COVM) on surgical performance, ergonomics, and teaching in vitreoretinal (VR) surgery.
Design
A single-center, retrospective cohort study and cross-sectional survey.
Methods
Surgical assistants (N = 12) and Vitreoretinal Surgeons (N = 2) were asked, in the survey arm, to complete a questionnaire regarding various parameters related to ergonomics, quality of visualization, quality of teaching, and overall satisfaction. Parameters were rated on a scale from 1 to 10 for both the 3DHUD and COVM visualization systems (VS). The scores of the two groups were compared using appropriate statistical tests. The retrospective arm of the study included 34 consecutive cases that underwent vitrectomy with the 3DHUD VS compared to 32 matched controls with the COVM. Demographics and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical parameters were identified in both groups and were compared using appropriate statistical tests.
Results
Survey scores were significantly higher in the 3DHUD VS group when compared to the COVM VS group for both Surgeons and Assistants regarding ergonomic parameters (overall comfort (p < 0.001), neck pain (p < 0.001), and lower back pain (p < 0.001)), visualization parameters (overall visibility (p < 0.001), visibility of the macula (p < 0.001), depth of field (p < 0.001), and quality of magnification (p < 0.001)) and teaching parameters (understanding of surgical steps by assistants (p < 0.001) and teaching to medical students and residents (p < 0.001)). Both demographics and clinical data of cases operated with the 3DHUD VS and COVM VS were comparable (p > 0.05). Anatomical and functional outcomes were similar in both groups (p > 0.05); nevertheless, mean surgical time was significantly longer in the 3DHUD group for tractional retinal detachments (p < 0.001), epiretinal membranes, and phacofragmentation (p = 0.03).
Conclusion
3DHUD greatly enhances ergonomics during vitreoretinal surgery and represents a significant innovation in the teaching armamentarium within the operating room. It provides the same surgical view for both the surgeons and assistants with an unparalleled image quality. A learning curve and an integrated ecosystem may be necessary to maximize its potential and reduce surgical time.