探索全球生态系统服务的复杂权衡与协同作用

IF 14 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jinnan Wang , Wenjun Wu , Meng Yang , Yueming Gao , Jiacheng Shao , Weishan Yang , Guoxia Ma , Fang Yu , Nan Yao , Hongqiang Jiang
{"title":"探索全球生态系统服务的复杂权衡与协同作用","authors":"Jinnan Wang ,&nbsp;Wenjun Wu ,&nbsp;Meng Yang ,&nbsp;Yueming Gao ,&nbsp;Jiacheng Shao ,&nbsp;Weishan Yang ,&nbsp;Guoxia Ma ,&nbsp;Fang Yu ,&nbsp;Nan Yao ,&nbsp;Hongqiang Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.ese.2024.100391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The trade-off and synergy relationship of ecosystem services is an important topic in the current assessment. The value of each service provided by the ecosystem is substantially affected by human activities, and conversely, its changes will also affect the relevant human decisions. Due to varying trade-offs among ecosystem services and synergies between them that can either increase or decrease, it is difficult to optimize multiple ecosystem services simultaneously, making it a huge challenge for ecosystem management. This study firstly develops a global Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) accounting framework. It uses remote sensing data with a spatial resolution of 1 km to estimate the ecosystem services of forests, wetlands, grasslands, deserts, and farmlands in 179 major countries in 2018. The results show that the range of global GEP values is USD 112–197 trillion, with an average value of USD 155 trillion (the constant price), and the ratio of GEP to gross domestic product (GDP) is 1.85. The trade-offs and the synergies among different ecosystem services in each continent and income group have been further explored. We found a correspondence between the income levels and the synergy among ecosystem services within each nation. Among specific ecosystem services, there are strong synergies between oxygen release, climate regulation, and carbon sequestration services. A trade-off relationship has been observed between flood regulation and other services, such as water conservation and soil retention services in low-income countries. The results will help clarify the roles and the feedback mechanisms between different stakeholders and provide a scientific basis for optimizing ecosystem management and implementing ecological compensation schemes to enhance human well-being.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34434,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100391"},"PeriodicalIF":14.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266649842400005X/pdfft?md5=117c63fe10c110bb13ae888506303a3d&pid=1-s2.0-S266649842400005X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the complex trade-offs and synergies of global ecosystem services\",\"authors\":\"Jinnan Wang ,&nbsp;Wenjun Wu ,&nbsp;Meng Yang ,&nbsp;Yueming Gao ,&nbsp;Jiacheng Shao ,&nbsp;Weishan Yang ,&nbsp;Guoxia Ma ,&nbsp;Fang Yu ,&nbsp;Nan Yao ,&nbsp;Hongqiang Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ese.2024.100391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The trade-off and synergy relationship of ecosystem services is an important topic in the current assessment. The value of each service provided by the ecosystem is substantially affected by human activities, and conversely, its changes will also affect the relevant human decisions. Due to varying trade-offs among ecosystem services and synergies between them that can either increase or decrease, it is difficult to optimize multiple ecosystem services simultaneously, making it a huge challenge for ecosystem management. This study firstly develops a global Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) accounting framework. It uses remote sensing data with a spatial resolution of 1 km to estimate the ecosystem services of forests, wetlands, grasslands, deserts, and farmlands in 179 major countries in 2018. The results show that the range of global GEP values is USD 112–197 trillion, with an average value of USD 155 trillion (the constant price), and the ratio of GEP to gross domestic product (GDP) is 1.85. The trade-offs and the synergies among different ecosystem services in each continent and income group have been further explored. We found a correspondence between the income levels and the synergy among ecosystem services within each nation. Among specific ecosystem services, there are strong synergies between oxygen release, climate regulation, and carbon sequestration services. A trade-off relationship has been observed between flood regulation and other services, such as water conservation and soil retention services in low-income countries. The results will help clarify the roles and the feedback mechanisms between different stakeholders and provide a scientific basis for optimizing ecosystem management and implementing ecological compensation schemes to enhance human well-being.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266649842400005X/pdfft?md5=117c63fe10c110bb13ae888506303a3d&pid=1-s2.0-S266649842400005X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266649842400005X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266649842400005X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态系统服务的权衡与协同关系是当前评估中的一个重要课题。生态系统提供的每种服务的价值都会受到人类活动的重大影响,反之,其变化也会影响人类的相关决策。由于生态系统服务之间的权衡各不相同,且它们之间的协同作用可增可减,因此很难同时优化多种生态系统服务,这对生态系统管理来说是一个巨大的挑战。本研究首先建立了一个全球生态系统生产总值(GEP)核算框架。它利用空间分辨率为 1 千米的遥感数据,估算了 2018 年 179 个主要国家的森林、湿地、草地、荒漠和农田的生态系统服务。结果显示,全球 GEP 值范围为 112-197 万亿美元,平均值为 155 万亿美元(不变价格),GEP 与国内生产总值(GDP)之比为 1.85。我们进一步探讨了各大洲和各收入组中不同生态系统服务之间的权衡和协同作用。我们发现,每个国家的收入水平与生态系统服务之间的协同作用之间存在对应关系。在具体的生态系统服务中,氧气释放、气候调节和碳封存服务之间存在很强的协同作用。在低收入国家,洪水调节与其他服务(如水源保护和土壤保持服务)之间存在权衡关系。研究结果将有助于澄清不同利益相关者之间的作用和反馈机制,并为优化生态系统管理和实施生态补偿计划以提高人类福祉提供科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring the complex trade-offs and synergies of global ecosystem services

Exploring the complex trade-offs and synergies of global ecosystem services

The trade-off and synergy relationship of ecosystem services is an important topic in the current assessment. The value of each service provided by the ecosystem is substantially affected by human activities, and conversely, its changes will also affect the relevant human decisions. Due to varying trade-offs among ecosystem services and synergies between them that can either increase or decrease, it is difficult to optimize multiple ecosystem services simultaneously, making it a huge challenge for ecosystem management. This study firstly develops a global Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) accounting framework. It uses remote sensing data with a spatial resolution of 1 km to estimate the ecosystem services of forests, wetlands, grasslands, deserts, and farmlands in 179 major countries in 2018. The results show that the range of global GEP values is USD 112–197 trillion, with an average value of USD 155 trillion (the constant price), and the ratio of GEP to gross domestic product (GDP) is 1.85. The trade-offs and the synergies among different ecosystem services in each continent and income group have been further explored. We found a correspondence between the income levels and the synergy among ecosystem services within each nation. Among specific ecosystem services, there are strong synergies between oxygen release, climate regulation, and carbon sequestration services. A trade-off relationship has been observed between flood regulation and other services, such as water conservation and soil retention services in low-income countries. The results will help clarify the roles and the feedback mechanisms between different stakeholders and provide a scientific basis for optimizing ecosystem management and implementing ecological compensation schemes to enhance human well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
6.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Ecotechnology (ESE) is an international, open-access journal publishing original research in environmental science, engineering, ecotechnology, and related fields. Authors publishing in ESE can immediately, permanently, and freely share their work. They have license options and retain copyright. Published by Elsevier, ESE is co-organized by the Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, and the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信