欧洲小组就颅骨成形术和创伤后脑积水的诊断和手术治疗提出的共识性建议

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Corrado Iaccarino , Salvatore Chibbaro , Thomas Sauvigny , Ivan Timofeev , Ismail Zaed , Silvio Franchetti , Harry Mee , Antonio Belli , Andras Buki , Pasquale De Bonis , Andreas K. Demetriades , Bart Depreitere , Kostantinos Fountas , Mario Ganau , Antonino Germanò , Peter Hutchinson , Angelos Kolias , Dirk Lindner , Laura Lippa , Niklas Marklund , Franco Servadei
{"title":"欧洲小组就颅骨成形术和创伤后脑积水的诊断和手术治疗提出的共识性建议","authors":"Corrado Iaccarino ,&nbsp;Salvatore Chibbaro ,&nbsp;Thomas Sauvigny ,&nbsp;Ivan Timofeev ,&nbsp;Ismail Zaed ,&nbsp;Silvio Franchetti ,&nbsp;Harry Mee ,&nbsp;Antonio Belli ,&nbsp;Andras Buki ,&nbsp;Pasquale De Bonis ,&nbsp;Andreas K. Demetriades ,&nbsp;Bart Depreitere ,&nbsp;Kostantinos Fountas ,&nbsp;Mario Ganau ,&nbsp;Antonino Germanò ,&nbsp;Peter Hutchinson ,&nbsp;Angelos Kolias ,&nbsp;Dirk Lindner ,&nbsp;Laura Lippa ,&nbsp;Niklas Marklund ,&nbsp;Franco Servadei","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Planning cranioplasty (CPL) in patients with suspected or proven post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) poses a significant management challenge due to a lack of clear guidance.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>This project aims to create a European document to improve adherence and adapt to local protocols based on available resources and national health systems.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>After a thorough non-systematic review, a steering committee (SC) formed a European expert panel (EP) for a two-round questionnaire using the Delphi method. The questionnaire employed a 9-point Likert scale to assess the appropriateness of statements inherent to two sections: \"Diagnostic criteria for PTH\" and \"Surgical strategies for PTH and cranial reconstruction.\"</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The panel reached a consensus on 29 statements. In the \"Diagnostic criteria for PTH\" section, five statements were deemed \"appropriate\" (consensus 74.2−90.3 %), two were labeled \"inappropriate,\" and seven were marked as \"uncertain.\"</p><p>In the \"Surgical strategies for PTH and cranial reconstruction\" section, four statements were considered \"appropriate\" (consensus 74.2−90.4 %), six were \"inappropriate,\" and five were \"uncertain.\"</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>Planning a cranioplasty alongside hydrocephalus remains a significant challenge in neurosurgery. Our consensus conference suggests that, in patients with cranial decompression and suspected hydrocephalus, the most suitable diagnostic approach involves a combination of evolving clinical conditions and neuroradiological imaging. The recommended management sequence prioritizes cranial reconstruction, with the option of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt when needed, preferably with a programmable valve. We strongly recommend to adopt local protocols based on expert consensus, such as this, to guide patient care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000171/pdfft?md5=2658d98eac368822d11ea0a7bc4f27dc&pid=1-s2.0-S2772529424000171-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus-based recommendations for diagnosis and surgical management of cranioplasty and post-traumatic hydrocephalus from a European panel\",\"authors\":\"Corrado Iaccarino ,&nbsp;Salvatore Chibbaro ,&nbsp;Thomas Sauvigny ,&nbsp;Ivan Timofeev ,&nbsp;Ismail Zaed ,&nbsp;Silvio Franchetti ,&nbsp;Harry Mee ,&nbsp;Antonio Belli ,&nbsp;Andras Buki ,&nbsp;Pasquale De Bonis ,&nbsp;Andreas K. Demetriades ,&nbsp;Bart Depreitere ,&nbsp;Kostantinos Fountas ,&nbsp;Mario Ganau ,&nbsp;Antonino Germanò ,&nbsp;Peter Hutchinson ,&nbsp;Angelos Kolias ,&nbsp;Dirk Lindner ,&nbsp;Laura Lippa ,&nbsp;Niklas Marklund ,&nbsp;Franco Servadei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Planning cranioplasty (CPL) in patients with suspected or proven post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) poses a significant management challenge due to a lack of clear guidance.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>This project aims to create a European document to improve adherence and adapt to local protocols based on available resources and national health systems.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>After a thorough non-systematic review, a steering committee (SC) formed a European expert panel (EP) for a two-round questionnaire using the Delphi method. The questionnaire employed a 9-point Likert scale to assess the appropriateness of statements inherent to two sections: \\\"Diagnostic criteria for PTH\\\" and \\\"Surgical strategies for PTH and cranial reconstruction.\\\"</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The panel reached a consensus on 29 statements. In the \\\"Diagnostic criteria for PTH\\\" section, five statements were deemed \\\"appropriate\\\" (consensus 74.2−90.3 %), two were labeled \\\"inappropriate,\\\" and seven were marked as \\\"uncertain.\\\"</p><p>In the \\\"Surgical strategies for PTH and cranial reconstruction\\\" section, four statements were considered \\\"appropriate\\\" (consensus 74.2−90.4 %), six were \\\"inappropriate,\\\" and five were \\\"uncertain.\\\"</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>Planning a cranioplasty alongside hydrocephalus remains a significant challenge in neurosurgery. Our consensus conference suggests that, in patients with cranial decompression and suspected hydrocephalus, the most suitable diagnostic approach involves a combination of evolving clinical conditions and neuroradiological imaging. The recommended management sequence prioritizes cranial reconstruction, with the option of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt when needed, preferably with a programmable valve. We strongly recommend to adopt local protocols based on expert consensus, such as this, to guide patient care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain & spine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000171/pdfft?md5=2658d98eac368822d11ea0a7bc4f27dc&pid=1-s2.0-S2772529424000171-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain & spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言由于缺乏明确的指导,对疑似或确诊为创伤后脑积水(PTH)的患者进行颅骨成形术(CPL)计划是一项重大的管理挑战。研究问题本项目旨在根据可用资源和国家卫生系统的情况,制定一份欧洲文件,以改善遵守情况并适应当地协议。方法经过全面的非系统性审查后,指导委员会(SC)组成了一个欧洲专家小组(EP),采用德尔菲法进行了两轮问卷调查。问卷采用 9 点李克特量表评估两个部分固有陈述的适当性:"结果专家组就 29 项陈述达成了共识。在 "PTH 的诊断标准 "部分,5 项声明被认为是 "适当的"(共识率为 74.2-90.3%),2 项声明被认为是 "不适当的",7 项声明被标记为 "不确定"。 在 "PTH 和颅骨重建的手术策略 "部分,4 项声明被认为是 "适当的"(共识率为 74.2-90.4%),6 项声明被认为是 "不适当的",5 项声明被标记为 "不确定"。我们的共识会议建议,对于颅骨减压并疑似脑积水的患者,最合适的诊断方法是将不断发展的临床条件和神经放射成像相结合。建议的处理顺序优先考虑颅骨重建,必要时可选择脑室腹腔分流术,最好是使用可编程阀门。我们强烈建议在专家共识的基础上采用类似的本地方案来指导患者的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consensus-based recommendations for diagnosis and surgical management of cranioplasty and post-traumatic hydrocephalus from a European panel

Introduction

Planning cranioplasty (CPL) in patients with suspected or proven post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) poses a significant management challenge due to a lack of clear guidance.

Research question

This project aims to create a European document to improve adherence and adapt to local protocols based on available resources and national health systems.

Methods

After a thorough non-systematic review, a steering committee (SC) formed a European expert panel (EP) for a two-round questionnaire using the Delphi method. The questionnaire employed a 9-point Likert scale to assess the appropriateness of statements inherent to two sections: "Diagnostic criteria for PTH" and "Surgical strategies for PTH and cranial reconstruction."

Results

The panel reached a consensus on 29 statements. In the "Diagnostic criteria for PTH" section, five statements were deemed "appropriate" (consensus 74.2−90.3 %), two were labeled "inappropriate," and seven were marked as "uncertain."

In the "Surgical strategies for PTH and cranial reconstruction" section, four statements were considered "appropriate" (consensus 74.2−90.4 %), six were "inappropriate," and five were "uncertain."

Discussion and conclusion

Planning a cranioplasty alongside hydrocephalus remains a significant challenge in neurosurgery. Our consensus conference suggests that, in patients with cranial decompression and suspected hydrocephalus, the most suitable diagnostic approach involves a combination of evolving clinical conditions and neuroradiological imaging. The recommended management sequence prioritizes cranial reconstruction, with the option of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt when needed, preferably with a programmable valve. We strongly recommend to adopt local protocols based on expert consensus, such as this, to guide patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信