三环类抗抑郁药对成人重度抑郁障碍患者的益处和害处:通过荟萃分析和试验序列分析进行的系统综述

0 PSYCHIATRY
Caroline Barkholt Kamp, Johanne Juul Petersen, Pascal Faltermeier, S. Juul, F. Siddiqui, Marija Barbateskovic, A. T. Kristensen, Joanna Moncrieff, Mark Horowitz, M. Hengartner, Irving Kirsch, Christian Gluud, J. Jakobsen
{"title":"三环类抗抑郁药对成人重度抑郁障碍患者的益处和害处:通过荟萃分析和试验序列分析进行的系统综述","authors":"Caroline Barkholt Kamp, Johanne Juul Petersen, Pascal Faltermeier, S. Juul, F. Siddiqui, Marija Barbateskovic, A. T. Kristensen, Joanna Moncrieff, Mark Horowitz, M. Hengartner, Irving Kirsch, Christian Gluud, J. Jakobsen","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2023-300730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Question Tricyclic antidepressants are used to treat depression worldwide, but the adverse effects have not been systematically assessed. Our objective was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of all tricyclic antidepressants for adults with major depressive disorder. Study selection and analysis We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and other sources from inception to January 2023 for randomised clinical trials comparing tricyclic antidepressants versus placebo or ‘active placebo’ for adults with major depressive disorder. The primary outcomes were depressive symptoms measured on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17), serious adverse events and quality of life. The minimal important difference was defined as three points on the HDRS-17. Findings We included 103 trials randomising 10 590 participants. All results were at high risk of bias, and the certainty of the evidence was very low or low. All trials only assessed outcomes at the end of the treatment period at a maximum of 12 weeks after randomisation. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis showed evidence of a beneficial effect of tricyclic antidepressants compared with placebo (mean difference −3.77 HDRS-17 points; 95% CI −5.91 to −1.63; 17 trials). Meta-analysis showed evidence of a harmful effect of tricyclic antidepressants compared with placebo on serious adverse events (OR 2.78; 95% CI 2.18 to 3.55; 35 trials), but the required information size was not reached. Only 2 out of 103 trials reported on quality of life and t-tests showed no evidence of a difference. Conclusions The long-term effects of tricyclic antidepressants and the effects on quality of life are unknown. Short-term results suggest that tricyclic antidepressants may reduce depressive symptoms while also increasing the risks of serious adverse events, but these results were based on low and very low certainty evidence. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021226161.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"133 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beneficial and harmful effects of tricyclic antidepressants for adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Barkholt Kamp, Johanne Juul Petersen, Pascal Faltermeier, S. Juul, F. Siddiqui, Marija Barbateskovic, A. T. Kristensen, Joanna Moncrieff, Mark Horowitz, M. Hengartner, Irving Kirsch, Christian Gluud, J. Jakobsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjment-2023-300730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Question Tricyclic antidepressants are used to treat depression worldwide, but the adverse effects have not been systematically assessed. Our objective was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of all tricyclic antidepressants for adults with major depressive disorder. Study selection and analysis We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and other sources from inception to January 2023 for randomised clinical trials comparing tricyclic antidepressants versus placebo or ‘active placebo’ for adults with major depressive disorder. The primary outcomes were depressive symptoms measured on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17), serious adverse events and quality of life. The minimal important difference was defined as three points on the HDRS-17. Findings We included 103 trials randomising 10 590 participants. All results were at high risk of bias, and the certainty of the evidence was very low or low. All trials only assessed outcomes at the end of the treatment period at a maximum of 12 weeks after randomisation. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis showed evidence of a beneficial effect of tricyclic antidepressants compared with placebo (mean difference −3.77 HDRS-17 points; 95% CI −5.91 to −1.63; 17 trials). Meta-analysis showed evidence of a harmful effect of tricyclic antidepressants compared with placebo on serious adverse events (OR 2.78; 95% CI 2.18 to 3.55; 35 trials), but the required information size was not reached. Only 2 out of 103 trials reported on quality of life and t-tests showed no evidence of a difference. Conclusions The long-term effects of tricyclic antidepressants and the effects on quality of life are unknown. Short-term results suggest that tricyclic antidepressants may reduce depressive symptoms while also increasing the risks of serious adverse events, but these results were based on low and very low certainty evidence. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021226161.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ mental health\",\"volume\":\"133 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题 世界各地都在使用三环类抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症,但尚未对其不良反应进行系统评估。我们的目标是评估所有三环类抗抑郁药对成人重度抑郁症患者的有益和有害影响。研究选择与分析 我们进行了系统性综述、荟萃分析和试验序列分析。我们检索了 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、LILACS 及其他来源(从开始到 2023 年 1 月)的随机临床试验,这些试验比较了三环类抗抑郁药与安慰剂或 "活性安慰剂 "对成人重度抑郁障碍患者的治疗效果。研究的主要结果是以 17 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS-17)测量的抑郁症状、严重不良事件和生活质量。最小重要差异被定义为 HDRS-17 的三个点。研究结果 我们纳入了 103 项试验,随机抽取了 10 590 名参与者。所有结果的偏倚风险都很高,证据的确定性很低或很低。所有试验仅在治疗期结束时评估结果,最长时间为随机分组后 12 周。Meta分析和试验序列分析显示,有证据表明三环类抗抑郁药与安慰剂相比具有有益效果(HDRS-17平均差异为-3.77分;95% CI为-5.91至-1.63;17项试验)。元分析显示,有证据表明三环类抗抑郁药与安慰剂相比对严重不良事件有有害影响(OR 2.78;95% CI 2.18 至 3.55;35 项试验),但未达到所需的信息量。103项试验中只有2项报告了生活质量,t检验显示没有证据表明两者存在差异。结论 三环类抗抑郁药的长期效果以及对生活质量的影响尚不清楚。短期结果表明,三环类抗抑郁药可能会减轻抑郁症状,同时也会增加发生严重不良事件的风险,但这些结果是基于低确定性和极低确定性证据得出的。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021226161。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beneficial and harmful effects of tricyclic antidepressants for adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
Question Tricyclic antidepressants are used to treat depression worldwide, but the adverse effects have not been systematically assessed. Our objective was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of all tricyclic antidepressants for adults with major depressive disorder. Study selection and analysis We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and other sources from inception to January 2023 for randomised clinical trials comparing tricyclic antidepressants versus placebo or ‘active placebo’ for adults with major depressive disorder. The primary outcomes were depressive symptoms measured on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17), serious adverse events and quality of life. The minimal important difference was defined as three points on the HDRS-17. Findings We included 103 trials randomising 10 590 participants. All results were at high risk of bias, and the certainty of the evidence was very low or low. All trials only assessed outcomes at the end of the treatment period at a maximum of 12 weeks after randomisation. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis showed evidence of a beneficial effect of tricyclic antidepressants compared with placebo (mean difference −3.77 HDRS-17 points; 95% CI −5.91 to −1.63; 17 trials). Meta-analysis showed evidence of a harmful effect of tricyclic antidepressants compared with placebo on serious adverse events (OR 2.78; 95% CI 2.18 to 3.55; 35 trials), but the required information size was not reached. Only 2 out of 103 trials reported on quality of life and t-tests showed no evidence of a difference. Conclusions The long-term effects of tricyclic antidepressants and the effects on quality of life are unknown. Short-term results suggest that tricyclic antidepressants may reduce depressive symptoms while also increasing the risks of serious adverse events, but these results were based on low and very low certainty evidence. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021226161.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信