重症监护护士的工作量。使用移动应用程序估算工作量的有效性,并与护理活动评分进行比较。文献系统回顾

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"重症监护护士的工作量。使用移动应用程序估算工作量的有效性,并与护理活动评分进行比较。文献系统回顾","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enfi.2023.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Adjusting human resources to intensive care units (ICU) workload is essential. The development of software for estimating nursing workload using mobile devices (smartphone, smartwatch and/or tablets) could be a useful tool and complement and/or improve the measurements made with the Nursing Activities Score (NAS), a validated scale.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To analyze the validity of devices and mobile applications for estimating ICU nurses’ workloads and their comparison with NAS.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>Systematised literature review from 2009 to 2021 informed by flowchart PRISMA-2020 and its extension PRISMA-S. Critical reading (CASPe). Steps: elaboration of the research question, concept identification (English and Spanish natural language and descriptors MesH, Emtree and CINAHL Headings), search strategy and data collection in <em>MEDlars online</em> (MEDLINE), Ovid, <em>Excerpta Medica dataBASE</em> (EMBASE), Elsevier, <em>Cumulative Index to Nursing &amp; Allied Health Literature</em> (CINAHL), EBSCO and <em>Web of Science</em> (WoS); data extraction and evaluation, analysis and synthesis of results. We included studies with abstracts published in English and Spanish conducted in ICU with workload measurement (preferably NAS) using mobile devices.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>223 studies of which 84 in MEDLINE, 50 in CINAHL, 48 in EMBASE, 33 in WoS and 8 in other sources. 117 were eligible for screening, of which 95 did not meet the inclusion criteria. 22 studies were screened for eligibility, of which 17 were excluded. Five articles were selected for final review. None of the studies provided results on costs, acceptance testing, validity, reliability, system problems, advantages, disadvantages or resource estimation.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusions</h3><p>The use of mobile devices and applications to measure ICU workloads is not yet validated and has not been shown to be more accurate than traditional NAS assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cargas de trabajo de las enfermeras en cuidados intensivos. Validez de su estimación mediante aplicaciones para dispositivos móviles y comparación con nursing activities score. Revisión sistematizada de la literatura\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfi.2023.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Adjusting human resources to intensive care units (ICU) workload is essential. The development of software for estimating nursing workload using mobile devices (smartphone, smartwatch and/or tablets) could be a useful tool and complement and/or improve the measurements made with the Nursing Activities Score (NAS), a validated scale.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To analyze the validity of devices and mobile applications for estimating ICU nurses’ workloads and their comparison with NAS.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>Systematised literature review from 2009 to 2021 informed by flowchart PRISMA-2020 and its extension PRISMA-S. Critical reading (CASPe). Steps: elaboration of the research question, concept identification (English and Spanish natural language and descriptors MesH, Emtree and CINAHL Headings), search strategy and data collection in <em>MEDlars online</em> (MEDLINE), Ovid, <em>Excerpta Medica dataBASE</em> (EMBASE), Elsevier, <em>Cumulative Index to Nursing &amp; Allied Health Literature</em> (CINAHL), EBSCO and <em>Web of Science</em> (WoS); data extraction and evaluation, analysis and synthesis of results. We included studies with abstracts published in English and Spanish conducted in ICU with workload measurement (preferably NAS) using mobile devices.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>223 studies of which 84 in MEDLINE, 50 in CINAHL, 48 in EMBASE, 33 in WoS and 8 in other sources. 117 were eligible for screening, of which 95 did not meet the inclusion criteria. 22 studies were screened for eligibility, of which 17 were excluded. Five articles were selected for final review. None of the studies provided results on costs, acceptance testing, validity, reliability, system problems, advantages, disadvantages or resource estimation.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusions</h3><p>The use of mobile devices and applications to measure ICU workloads is not yet validated and has not been shown to be more accurate than traditional NAS assessment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239923000676\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239923000676","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:根据重症监护病房(ICU)的工作量调整人力资源至关重要。使用移动设备(智能手机、智能手表和/或平板电脑)开发估算护理工作量的软件可能是一种有用的工具,可补充和/或改进使用护理活动评分(NAS)这一经过验证的量表进行的测量。方法根据流程图 PRISMA-2020 及其扩展 PRISMA-S,对 2009 年至 2021 年的文献进行系统回顾。批判性阅读(CASPe)。步骤:阐述研究问题、概念识别(英语和西班牙语自然语言和描述符 MesH、Emtree 和 CINAHL Headings)、检索策略以及在 MEDlars online (MEDLINE)、Ovid、Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE)、Elsevier、Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)、EBSCO 和 Web of Science (WoS)中收集数据;数据提取和评估、结果分析和综合。结果 223 项研究中,MEDLINE 收录 84 项,CINAHL 收录 50 项,EMBASE 收录 48 项,WoS 收录 33 项,其他来源 8 项。117 项符合筛选条件,其中 95 项不符合纳入标准。对 22 项研究进行了资格筛选,其中 17 项被排除。最后筛选出 5 篇文章进行最终审查。这些研究均未提供有关成本、验收测试、有效性、可靠性、系统问题、优缺点或资源估算的结果。讨论与结论使用移动设备和应用程序来测量重症监护室的工作量尚未得到验证,也未证明其比传统的 NAS 评估更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cargas de trabajo de las enfermeras en cuidados intensivos. Validez de su estimación mediante aplicaciones para dispositivos móviles y comparación con nursing activities score. Revisión sistematizada de la literatura

Introduction

Adjusting human resources to intensive care units (ICU) workload is essential. The development of software for estimating nursing workload using mobile devices (smartphone, smartwatch and/or tablets) could be a useful tool and complement and/or improve the measurements made with the Nursing Activities Score (NAS), a validated scale.

Objectives

To analyze the validity of devices and mobile applications for estimating ICU nurses’ workloads and their comparison with NAS.

Methodology

Systematised literature review from 2009 to 2021 informed by flowchart PRISMA-2020 and its extension PRISMA-S. Critical reading (CASPe). Steps: elaboration of the research question, concept identification (English and Spanish natural language and descriptors MesH, Emtree and CINAHL Headings), search strategy and data collection in MEDlars online (MEDLINE), Ovid, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Elsevier, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EBSCO and Web of Science (WoS); data extraction and evaluation, analysis and synthesis of results. We included studies with abstracts published in English and Spanish conducted in ICU with workload measurement (preferably NAS) using mobile devices.

Results

223 studies of which 84 in MEDLINE, 50 in CINAHL, 48 in EMBASE, 33 in WoS and 8 in other sources. 117 were eligible for screening, of which 95 did not meet the inclusion criteria. 22 studies were screened for eligibility, of which 17 were excluded. Five articles were selected for final review. None of the studies provided results on costs, acceptance testing, validity, reliability, system problems, advantages, disadvantages or resource estimation.

Discussion and conclusions

The use of mobile devices and applications to measure ICU workloads is not yet validated and has not been shown to be more accurate than traditional NAS assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信