幼乳牛单个爪子的生长和磨损特征

{"title":"幼乳牛单个爪子的生长和磨损特征","authors":"","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2023-0408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Data are limited on how cow hooves develop early in life and how this will affect susceptibility to lameness and claw disorders later in life. The aim of this study was to characterize individual claw growth and wear in dairy calves. A total of 90 male Holstein calves &lt;1 wk old were enrolled in this completely randomized design experiment and monitored until wk 20 of age. Evaluation of hoof development was conducted by visual inspection, and individual claw measurements were taken with a graduated ruler. Claws were numbered from 1 to 8 to maintain consistent data collection, where front claws were numbered 1 to 4 (left to right) and rear claws were 5 to 8. Lateral claws were numbered 1, 4, 5, and 8, and medial claws were 2, 3, 6, and 7. Measurements included length from the coronary band to the end of the hoof wall and from the coronary band to the groove line, resulting in the variables claw length (CL) and groove length (GL), respectively. Hoof development was evaluated at wk 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20. All evaluations were performed by the same person throughout the study to eliminate variation between observers. Hoof growth and wear were derived from CL and GL measurements and analyzed from wk 0 to 20. Claw length at wk 0 was different across claw positions, and maximal claw length was observed in claws in positions 6 and 7 (i.e., rear medial claws). A similar growth pattern in claw length was observed when evaluated from wk 0 to 20, where a greater claw length was observed in claws 6 and 7 compared with other claws. In contrast to claw length, claw wear at wk 20 was lower in claws 6 and 7 compared with other claws. Compared with rear claws, front claws had greater wear at wk 20, and compared with medial claws, lateral claws had greater wear at wk 20. Factors associated with claw length differences at wk 0 remain to be elucidated, but the fact that this uneven claw length difference was maintained 20 wk after birth is puzzling. The complementary claw length to wear described greater wear in claws 1 and 4 (i.e., front lateral) in young calves, which is translated into lower claw length in the same claws by wk 20 after birth. Future research in postnatal hoof growth should strive to understand the potential biological significance of this effect on lameness resistance and longevity of dairy cows.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 356-360"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000012/pdfft?md5=80387cf45d519331de1e509b7ea7aa96&pid=1-s2.0-S2666910224000012-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth and wear characteristics of individual claws in young dairy calves\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.3168/jdsc.2023-0408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Data are limited on how cow hooves develop early in life and how this will affect susceptibility to lameness and claw disorders later in life. The aim of this study was to characterize individual claw growth and wear in dairy calves. A total of 90 male Holstein calves &lt;1 wk old were enrolled in this completely randomized design experiment and monitored until wk 20 of age. Evaluation of hoof development was conducted by visual inspection, and individual claw measurements were taken with a graduated ruler. Claws were numbered from 1 to 8 to maintain consistent data collection, where front claws were numbered 1 to 4 (left to right) and rear claws were 5 to 8. Lateral claws were numbered 1, 4, 5, and 8, and medial claws were 2, 3, 6, and 7. Measurements included length from the coronary band to the end of the hoof wall and from the coronary band to the groove line, resulting in the variables claw length (CL) and groove length (GL), respectively. Hoof development was evaluated at wk 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20. All evaluations were performed by the same person throughout the study to eliminate variation between observers. Hoof growth and wear were derived from CL and GL measurements and analyzed from wk 0 to 20. Claw length at wk 0 was different across claw positions, and maximal claw length was observed in claws in positions 6 and 7 (i.e., rear medial claws). A similar growth pattern in claw length was observed when evaluated from wk 0 to 20, where a greater claw length was observed in claws 6 and 7 compared with other claws. In contrast to claw length, claw wear at wk 20 was lower in claws 6 and 7 compared with other claws. Compared with rear claws, front claws had greater wear at wk 20, and compared with medial claws, lateral claws had greater wear at wk 20. Factors associated with claw length differences at wk 0 remain to be elucidated, but the fact that this uneven claw length difference was maintained 20 wk after birth is puzzling. The complementary claw length to wear described greater wear in claws 1 and 4 (i.e., front lateral) in young calves, which is translated into lower claw length in the same claws by wk 20 after birth. Future research in postnatal hoof growth should strive to understand the potential biological significance of this effect on lameness resistance and longevity of dairy cows.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JDS communications\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 356-360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000012/pdfft?md5=80387cf45d519331de1e509b7ea7aa96&pid=1-s2.0-S2666910224000012-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JDS communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于牛蹄在生命早期是如何发育的,以及这将如何影响日后跛足和蹄病的易感性,相关数据十分有限。本研究旨在描述奶牛犊牛个体蹄爪生长和磨损的特征。共有 90 头 1 周大的雄性荷斯坦犊牛参加了这项完全随机设计实验,并一直监测到 20 周大。犊牛蹄的发育情况通过目测进行评估,并用刻度尺测量单个蹄爪的尺寸。为保持数据收集的一致性,蹄爪的编号为 1 至 8,其中前爪编号为 1 至 4(从左到右),后爪编号为 5 至 8。外侧爪编号为 1、4、5 和 8,内侧爪编号为 2、3、6 和 7。测量包括从冠状带到蹄壁末端的长度和从冠状带到蹄槽线的长度,从而分别得出爪长(CL)和蹄槽长(GL)这两个变量。在第 0、5、10、15 和 20 周对蹄的发育情况进行评估。在整个研究过程中,所有评估均由同一人进行,以消除观察者之间的差异。根据CL和GL的测量结果,对0至20周的蹄生长和磨损情况进行分析。第 0 周时,不同爪位的爪长不同,第 6 和第 7 爪(即后内侧爪)的爪长最大。从第0周到第20周,爪长的增长模式与此类似,与其他爪相比,第6和第7爪的爪长更长。与爪长相反,第 20 周时第 6 爪和第 7 爪的爪磨损程度低于其他爪。与后爪相比,前爪在第20周时的磨损程度更大;与内侧爪相比,外侧爪在第20周时的磨损程度更大。与第0周时爪长差异相关的因素仍有待阐明,但这种不均匀的爪长差异在出生后20周仍保持不变的事实令人费解。爪长与磨损的互补性描述了幼犊第 1 爪和第 4 爪(即前外侧)的磨损程度更大,到出生后第 20 周时,这两个爪的爪长会变短。未来的产后蹄生长研究应努力了解这种影响对奶牛抗跛行能力和寿命的潜在生物学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Growth and wear characteristics of individual claws in young dairy calves

Data are limited on how cow hooves develop early in life and how this will affect susceptibility to lameness and claw disorders later in life. The aim of this study was to characterize individual claw growth and wear in dairy calves. A total of 90 male Holstein calves <1 wk old were enrolled in this completely randomized design experiment and monitored until wk 20 of age. Evaluation of hoof development was conducted by visual inspection, and individual claw measurements were taken with a graduated ruler. Claws were numbered from 1 to 8 to maintain consistent data collection, where front claws were numbered 1 to 4 (left to right) and rear claws were 5 to 8. Lateral claws were numbered 1, 4, 5, and 8, and medial claws were 2, 3, 6, and 7. Measurements included length from the coronary band to the end of the hoof wall and from the coronary band to the groove line, resulting in the variables claw length (CL) and groove length (GL), respectively. Hoof development was evaluated at wk 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20. All evaluations were performed by the same person throughout the study to eliminate variation between observers. Hoof growth and wear were derived from CL and GL measurements and analyzed from wk 0 to 20. Claw length at wk 0 was different across claw positions, and maximal claw length was observed in claws in positions 6 and 7 (i.e., rear medial claws). A similar growth pattern in claw length was observed when evaluated from wk 0 to 20, where a greater claw length was observed in claws 6 and 7 compared with other claws. In contrast to claw length, claw wear at wk 20 was lower in claws 6 and 7 compared with other claws. Compared with rear claws, front claws had greater wear at wk 20, and compared with medial claws, lateral claws had greater wear at wk 20. Factors associated with claw length differences at wk 0 remain to be elucidated, but the fact that this uneven claw length difference was maintained 20 wk after birth is puzzling. The complementary claw length to wear described greater wear in claws 1 and 4 (i.e., front lateral) in young calves, which is translated into lower claw length in the same claws by wk 20 after birth. Future research in postnatal hoof growth should strive to understand the potential biological significance of this effect on lameness resistance and longevity of dairy cows.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信