从生物学角度比较塞marang 市 Ngaliyan 传统市场和现代市场蔬菜产品的质量水平。

Malika Allfathania Pradjasasmitha, Nikmatul Udzmah, Septiani Dwi Saputri, Mirtaati Naima, A. Hidayatullah
{"title":"从生物学角度比较塞marang 市 Ngaliyan 传统市场和现代市场蔬菜产品的质量水平。","authors":"Malika Allfathania Pradjasasmitha, Nikmatul Udzmah, Septiani Dwi Saputri, Mirtaati Naima, A. Hidayatullah","doi":"10.29103/ag.v8i2.13476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vegetables are an important source of nutrients in the fulfillment of essential nutrients for human health. The selection of quality vegetables is the main key in ensuring maximum nutritional benefits. Traditional markets and modern markets offer different approaches to quality including freshness, nutritional composition, price, shelf life and safety in confectionery. Therefore, this study aims to compare the quality of vegetables in traditional markets and modern markets by considering biological factors such as surface texture, color, freshness, and integrity of the selected vegetable samples. The research method used is a qualitative descriptive method consisting of identifying issues and objectives, collecting data, analyzing, and formulating concepts. Data collection by taking samples from one of the populations as the main data collection tool to compare the quality of vegetables in traditional markets with modern markets in Ngaliyan District, Semarang City from a biological perspective. In this study the samples used in the study were taken from five different types of vegetables, namely tomatoes, carrots, pakcoy, potatoes, and leeks. The results showed that the comparison of the quality of vegetables owned by traditional markets tends to be fresher and has a higher nutritional content compared to Superindo Modern Market. This is due to the harvesting process that is closer to the time of sale in traditional markets, so that the nutrients in vegetables are still well preserved. On the other hand, vegetables sold in Superindo Modern Market often undergo a longer preservation and transportation process, so that their nutritional content can be reduced.","PeriodicalId":269309,"journal":{"name":"Agrifo : Jurnal Agribisnis Universitas Malikussaleh","volume":"5 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERBANDINGAN TINGKAT KUALITAS PRODUK SAYURAN PADA PASAR TRADISIONAL DAN PASAR MODERN DI NGALIYAN KOTA SEMARANG DALAM PERSPEKTIF BIOLOGI\",\"authors\":\"Malika Allfathania Pradjasasmitha, Nikmatul Udzmah, Septiani Dwi Saputri, Mirtaati Naima, A. Hidayatullah\",\"doi\":\"10.29103/ag.v8i2.13476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Vegetables are an important source of nutrients in the fulfillment of essential nutrients for human health. The selection of quality vegetables is the main key in ensuring maximum nutritional benefits. Traditional markets and modern markets offer different approaches to quality including freshness, nutritional composition, price, shelf life and safety in confectionery. Therefore, this study aims to compare the quality of vegetables in traditional markets and modern markets by considering biological factors such as surface texture, color, freshness, and integrity of the selected vegetable samples. The research method used is a qualitative descriptive method consisting of identifying issues and objectives, collecting data, analyzing, and formulating concepts. Data collection by taking samples from one of the populations as the main data collection tool to compare the quality of vegetables in traditional markets with modern markets in Ngaliyan District, Semarang City from a biological perspective. In this study the samples used in the study were taken from five different types of vegetables, namely tomatoes, carrots, pakcoy, potatoes, and leeks. The results showed that the comparison of the quality of vegetables owned by traditional markets tends to be fresher and has a higher nutritional content compared to Superindo Modern Market. This is due to the harvesting process that is closer to the time of sale in traditional markets, so that the nutrients in vegetables are still well preserved. On the other hand, vegetables sold in Superindo Modern Market often undergo a longer preservation and transportation process, so that their nutritional content can be reduced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agrifo : Jurnal Agribisnis Universitas Malikussaleh\",\"volume\":\"5 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agrifo : Jurnal Agribisnis Universitas Malikussaleh\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29103/ag.v8i2.13476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrifo : Jurnal Agribisnis Universitas Malikussaleh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29103/ag.v8i2.13476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蔬菜是人体健康必需营养素的重要来源。选择优质蔬菜是确保营养最大化的关键。传统市场和现代市场提供了不同的质量方法,包括新鲜度、营养成分、价格、保质期和糖果的安全性。因此,本研究旨在通过考虑所选蔬菜样本的表面纹理、颜色、新鲜度和完整性等生物因素,比较传统市场和现代市场的蔬菜质量。采用的研究方法是定性描述法,包括确定问题和目标、收集数据、分析和形成概念。数据收集的主要手段是从其中一个人群中抽取样本,从生物学角度比较三宝垄市 Ngaliyan 区传统市场和现代市场的蔬菜质量。本研究中使用的样本来自五种不同类型的蔬菜,即西红柿、胡萝卜、包谷、土豆和韭菜。结果显示,与 Superindo 现代市场相比,传统市场的蔬菜质量更新鲜,营养成分更高。这是由于传统市场的采摘过程更接近销售时间,因此蔬菜中的营养成分仍然保存完好。另一方面,Superindo 现代市场销售的蔬菜通常要经过较长的保存和运输过程,因此营养成分可能会降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PERBANDINGAN TINGKAT KUALITAS PRODUK SAYURAN PADA PASAR TRADISIONAL DAN PASAR MODERN DI NGALIYAN KOTA SEMARANG DALAM PERSPEKTIF BIOLOGI
Vegetables are an important source of nutrients in the fulfillment of essential nutrients for human health. The selection of quality vegetables is the main key in ensuring maximum nutritional benefits. Traditional markets and modern markets offer different approaches to quality including freshness, nutritional composition, price, shelf life and safety in confectionery. Therefore, this study aims to compare the quality of vegetables in traditional markets and modern markets by considering biological factors such as surface texture, color, freshness, and integrity of the selected vegetable samples. The research method used is a qualitative descriptive method consisting of identifying issues and objectives, collecting data, analyzing, and formulating concepts. Data collection by taking samples from one of the populations as the main data collection tool to compare the quality of vegetables in traditional markets with modern markets in Ngaliyan District, Semarang City from a biological perspective. In this study the samples used in the study were taken from five different types of vegetables, namely tomatoes, carrots, pakcoy, potatoes, and leeks. The results showed that the comparison of the quality of vegetables owned by traditional markets tends to be fresher and has a higher nutritional content compared to Superindo Modern Market. This is due to the harvesting process that is closer to the time of sale in traditional markets, so that the nutrients in vegetables are still well preserved. On the other hand, vegetables sold in Superindo Modern Market often undergo a longer preservation and transportation process, so that their nutritional content can be reduced.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信