{"title":"社区学院系主任与兼职教师之间的事务性和权宜性关系","authors":"Keith Zoromski, Pietro A. Sasso","doi":"10.1177/00915521231218239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the relationship between community college department chairs and their adjunct faculty. Methods: This was a descriptive phenomenological qualitative study that used individual semi-structured interviews of 14 department chairs from a purposive sample drawn from a midwestern community college. Data analysis was conducted through two cycles of coding using phenomenological approaches. Results: Findings suggest that department chair relationships with adjunct faculty are transactional, have limited depth, and are perceived as scheduling stopgaps. Department chairs describe their connection as centered on scheduling or administration to prioritize student needs above relationship building. Contributions: The study contributes to existing research by elucidating that the department chair-adjunct didactic relationship is superficial. Department chairs, opposed to lead instructors, hold the most influence to positively influence the academic environment through a deepened relationship with adjunct faculty. Important implications for practice are provided for focused intentional efforts to humanize adjunct faculty within their institutions.","PeriodicalId":46564,"journal":{"name":"Community College Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transactional and Stopgap Relationships Between Community College Department Chairs and Their Adjuncts\",\"authors\":\"Keith Zoromski, Pietro A. Sasso\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00915521231218239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the relationship between community college department chairs and their adjunct faculty. Methods: This was a descriptive phenomenological qualitative study that used individual semi-structured interviews of 14 department chairs from a purposive sample drawn from a midwestern community college. Data analysis was conducted through two cycles of coding using phenomenological approaches. Results: Findings suggest that department chair relationships with adjunct faculty are transactional, have limited depth, and are perceived as scheduling stopgaps. Department chairs describe their connection as centered on scheduling or administration to prioritize student needs above relationship building. Contributions: The study contributes to existing research by elucidating that the department chair-adjunct didactic relationship is superficial. Department chairs, opposed to lead instructors, hold the most influence to positively influence the academic environment through a deepened relationship with adjunct faculty. Important implications for practice are provided for focused intentional efforts to humanize adjunct faculty within their institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community College Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community College Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521231218239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community College Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521231218239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Transactional and Stopgap Relationships Between Community College Department Chairs and Their Adjuncts
Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the relationship between community college department chairs and their adjunct faculty. Methods: This was a descriptive phenomenological qualitative study that used individual semi-structured interviews of 14 department chairs from a purposive sample drawn from a midwestern community college. Data analysis was conducted through two cycles of coding using phenomenological approaches. Results: Findings suggest that department chair relationships with adjunct faculty are transactional, have limited depth, and are perceived as scheduling stopgaps. Department chairs describe their connection as centered on scheduling or administration to prioritize student needs above relationship building. Contributions: The study contributes to existing research by elucidating that the department chair-adjunct didactic relationship is superficial. Department chairs, opposed to lead instructors, hold the most influence to positively influence the academic environment through a deepened relationship with adjunct faculty. Important implications for practice are provided for focused intentional efforts to humanize adjunct faculty within their institutions.
期刊介绍:
The Community College Review (CCR) has led the nation for over 35 years in the publication of scholarly, peer-reviewed research and commentary on community colleges. CCR welcomes manuscripts dealing with all aspects of community college administration, education, and policy, both within the American higher education system as well as within the higher education systems of other countries that have similar tertiary institutions. All submitted manuscripts undergo a blind review. When manuscripts are not accepted for publication, we offer suggestions for how they might be revised. The ultimate intent is to further discourse about community colleges, their students, and the educators and administrators who work within these institutions.