冲突的修辞。中世纪晚期布雷斯劳与教会之间的战争与争端(引言)

Halina Manikowska
{"title":"冲突的修辞。中世纪晚期布雷斯劳与教会之间的战争与争端(引言)","authors":"Halina Manikowska","doi":"10.36693/202303p.303-322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rhetoric of conflict. Wars and disputes between Wrocław and the Church in the late Middle Ages (introductory remarks)\n\nDrawing on the documentation of Wrocław’s conflicts with the Church in the late Middle Ages, the author emphasises the importance of research into language and rhetoric, topics virtually absent from previous studies devoted to the subject. Until Wrocław’s war with King George of Poděbrady in the second half of the fifteenth century, a vast majority of this documentation originated in church chancelleries. Analysing mainly fourteenth- century sources, created during fierce disputes over the (non-)payment of Peter’s pence and the conflicts of John of Luxembourg and some Silesian dukes with the Bishop of Wrocław, in which the city of Wrocław was involved, the author concludes that the strongly formalised vocabulary and rhetoric of trial records and the accompanying writings depended primarily on the classifications (ranks) — which belonged to different orders — of the committed/ prosecuted about act (crime), the Church’s claims and the punishment/compensation it demanded, as well as the need to make the connection between attacking the Church and sin apparent. We, therefore, need to bear in mind not only the obvious and necessary dependence of this rhetoric on the procedure and form of court records as well as letters to various instances (including the highest instance, the pope), its role as a purely legal argument, but also the need to express moral condemnation of the incriminated act and demonstrate its relation to sin. Instead, a resolution of the dispute and removal of the excommunication and interdict required conciliatory language and rhetoric that stripped the previously incriminated acts, events and condemned perpetrators of their status as criminal attacks on the Church and its laws. The vocabulary and rhetoric present in sources dating as far back as the late thirteenth and first half of the fourteenth century, and used to describe the city’s conflicts with the Church remained relevant until the end of the Middle Ages. In the second part of the article the author challenges the classification of the description, included in Chronica Principum Poloniae, of Bishop Nanker’s excommunication of King John of Luxembourg and the Wrocław councillors (1339) as an account of actual events said to have taken place in the Franciscan Monastery in Wrocław. In her opinion, the scene was made up in its entirety (the excommunication and interdict were indeed imposed) and was used by the author of the chronicle to attribute to Nanker (d. 1341) involvement in the establishment of the Archbishopric of Prague in 1344.","PeriodicalId":146426,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Historyczny","volume":" 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retoryka konfliktu. Wojny i spory Wrocławia z Kościołem w późnym średniowieczu (uwagi wstępne)\",\"authors\":\"Halina Manikowska\",\"doi\":\"10.36693/202303p.303-322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rhetoric of conflict. Wars and disputes between Wrocław and the Church in the late Middle Ages (introductory remarks)\\n\\nDrawing on the documentation of Wrocław’s conflicts with the Church in the late Middle Ages, the author emphasises the importance of research into language and rhetoric, topics virtually absent from previous studies devoted to the subject. Until Wrocław’s war with King George of Poděbrady in the second half of the fifteenth century, a vast majority of this documentation originated in church chancelleries. Analysing mainly fourteenth- century sources, created during fierce disputes over the (non-)payment of Peter’s pence and the conflicts of John of Luxembourg and some Silesian dukes with the Bishop of Wrocław, in which the city of Wrocław was involved, the author concludes that the strongly formalised vocabulary and rhetoric of trial records and the accompanying writings depended primarily on the classifications (ranks) — which belonged to different orders — of the committed/ prosecuted about act (crime), the Church’s claims and the punishment/compensation it demanded, as well as the need to make the connection between attacking the Church and sin apparent. We, therefore, need to bear in mind not only the obvious and necessary dependence of this rhetoric on the procedure and form of court records as well as letters to various instances (including the highest instance, the pope), its role as a purely legal argument, but also the need to express moral condemnation of the incriminated act and demonstrate its relation to sin. Instead, a resolution of the dispute and removal of the excommunication and interdict required conciliatory language and rhetoric that stripped the previously incriminated acts, events and condemned perpetrators of their status as criminal attacks on the Church and its laws. The vocabulary and rhetoric present in sources dating as far back as the late thirteenth and first half of the fourteenth century, and used to describe the city’s conflicts with the Church remained relevant until the end of the Middle Ages. In the second part of the article the author challenges the classification of the description, included in Chronica Principum Poloniae, of Bishop Nanker’s excommunication of King John of Luxembourg and the Wrocław councillors (1339) as an account of actual events said to have taken place in the Franciscan Monastery in Wrocław. In her opinion, the scene was made up in its entirety (the excommunication and interdict were indeed imposed) and was used by the author of the chronicle to attribute to Nanker (d. 1341) involvement in the establishment of the Archbishopric of Prague in 1344.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przegląd Historyczny\",\"volume\":\" 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przegląd Historyczny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36693/202303p.303-322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Historyczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36693/202303p.303-322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冲突的修辞。中世纪晚期弗罗茨瓦夫与教会之间的战争和争端(引言)作者根据弗罗茨瓦夫在中世纪晚期与教会冲突的文献资料,强调了语言和修辞研究的重要性,而在以往的相关研究中,这些主题几乎是空白。在十五世纪下半叶弗罗茨瓦夫与波德布拉迪的乔治国王开战之前,绝大多数文献都源自教会的教堂。作者主要对十四世纪的资料进行了分析,这些资料是在彼得便士(不)支付以及卢森堡的约翰和一些西里西亚公爵与弗罗茨瓦夫主教的冲突中产生的,弗罗茨瓦夫市也卷入其中、作者的结论是,审判记录和相关著作的词汇和修辞都非常正规化,主要取决于对所犯/被起诉行为(罪行)的分类(等级)--这些行为属于不同的等级--、教会的主张和要求的惩罚/赔偿,以及将攻击教会与罪恶之间的联系明确化的需要。因此,我们不仅要牢记这种修辞明显而必要地依赖于法庭记录的程序和形式,以及写给各种场合(包括最高场合,教皇)的信件,牢记其作为纯粹法律论据的作用,而且要牢记表达对被指控行为的道德谴责并证明其与罪恶的关系。相反,要解决争端并解除逐出教会和禁治令,就必须使用和解的语言和修辞,使先前被定罪的行为、事件和被定罪的犯罪者失去其攻击教会及其法律的犯罪地位。早在 13 世纪晚期和 14 世纪上半叶的资料中就有用于描述城市与教会冲突的词汇和修辞,这些词汇和修辞直到中世纪末期仍然适用。在文章的第二部分,作者对《波兰纪事》(Chronica Principum Poloniae)中关于南克主教将卢森堡国王约翰和弗罗茨瓦夫议员逐出教会(1339 年)的描述分类提出了质疑,认为该描述描述的是弗罗茨瓦夫方济会修道院中发生的真实事件。在她看来,这一幕完全是编造的(确实实施了驱逐和禁足),编年史的作者利用这一幕将 1344 年布拉格大主教区的建立归功于南克(卒于 1341 年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retoryka konfliktu. Wojny i spory Wrocławia z Kościołem w późnym średniowieczu (uwagi wstępne)
The rhetoric of conflict. Wars and disputes between Wrocław and the Church in the late Middle Ages (introductory remarks) Drawing on the documentation of Wrocław’s conflicts with the Church in the late Middle Ages, the author emphasises the importance of research into language and rhetoric, topics virtually absent from previous studies devoted to the subject. Until Wrocław’s war with King George of Poděbrady in the second half of the fifteenth century, a vast majority of this documentation originated in church chancelleries. Analysing mainly fourteenth- century sources, created during fierce disputes over the (non-)payment of Peter’s pence and the conflicts of John of Luxembourg and some Silesian dukes with the Bishop of Wrocław, in which the city of Wrocław was involved, the author concludes that the strongly formalised vocabulary and rhetoric of trial records and the accompanying writings depended primarily on the classifications (ranks) — which belonged to different orders — of the committed/ prosecuted about act (crime), the Church’s claims and the punishment/compensation it demanded, as well as the need to make the connection between attacking the Church and sin apparent. We, therefore, need to bear in mind not only the obvious and necessary dependence of this rhetoric on the procedure and form of court records as well as letters to various instances (including the highest instance, the pope), its role as a purely legal argument, but also the need to express moral condemnation of the incriminated act and demonstrate its relation to sin. Instead, a resolution of the dispute and removal of the excommunication and interdict required conciliatory language and rhetoric that stripped the previously incriminated acts, events and condemned perpetrators of their status as criminal attacks on the Church and its laws. The vocabulary and rhetoric present in sources dating as far back as the late thirteenth and first half of the fourteenth century, and used to describe the city’s conflicts with the Church remained relevant until the end of the Middle Ages. In the second part of the article the author challenges the classification of the description, included in Chronica Principum Poloniae, of Bishop Nanker’s excommunication of King John of Luxembourg and the Wrocław councillors (1339) as an account of actual events said to have taken place in the Franciscan Monastery in Wrocław. In her opinion, the scene was made up in its entirety (the excommunication and interdict were indeed imposed) and was used by the author of the chronicle to attribute to Nanker (d. 1341) involvement in the establishment of the Archbishopric of Prague in 1344.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信