笔剑之间:福柯与战略科学

Felipe Luiz
{"title":"笔剑之间:福柯与战略科学","authors":"Felipe Luiz","doi":"10.25247/p1982-999x.2024.v24n1.p64-78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present paper is to expose some similarities and differences between Foucault, very famous, the French general, André Beaufre, Strategy theoretician, and the notion of National Power, as it is found in some theoretical material of Brazilian military. First, some of Foucault conceptions are exposed, specially those who ink themselves with the question of the political power and notions akin to the Military Science's development. After, it’s general André Beaufre time of being judged by us, as we compare him with Clausewitz and Liddell Hart, Strategy’s theoreticians as him. After, the notion of National Power ´s exposed. Finally, we make a balance of the possible intersection between the three exposés.","PeriodicalId":145419,"journal":{"name":"Revista Ágora Filosófica","volume":" 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entre a pena e a espada: Foucault e a ciência da estratégia\",\"authors\":\"Felipe Luiz\",\"doi\":\"10.25247/p1982-999x.2024.v24n1.p64-78\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the present paper is to expose some similarities and differences between Foucault, very famous, the French general, André Beaufre, Strategy theoretician, and the notion of National Power, as it is found in some theoretical material of Brazilian military. First, some of Foucault conceptions are exposed, specially those who ink themselves with the question of the political power and notions akin to the Military Science's development. After, it’s general André Beaufre time of being judged by us, as we compare him with Clausewitz and Liddell Hart, Strategy’s theoreticians as him. After, the notion of National Power ´s exposed. Finally, we make a balance of the possible intersection between the three exposés.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Ágora Filosófica\",\"volume\":\" 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Ágora Filosófica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25247/p1982-999x.2024.v24n1.p64-78\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Ágora Filosófica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25247/p1982-999x.2024.v24n1.p64-78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在揭示著名的法国将军福柯、战略理论家安德烈-博弗尔与巴西军事理论材料中的 "国家权力 "概念之间的异同。首先,揭示了福柯的一些概念,特别是那些与政治权力问题和类似军事科学发展的概念有关的概念。然后,我们将安德烈-博弗尔将军与克劳塞维茨、利德尔-哈特等战略理论家进行比较,对其进行评判。之后,揭示了国家权力的概念。最后,我们将对三者之间可能的交集进行权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Entre a pena e a espada: Foucault e a ciência da estratégia
The aim of the present paper is to expose some similarities and differences between Foucault, very famous, the French general, André Beaufre, Strategy theoretician, and the notion of National Power, as it is found in some theoretical material of Brazilian military. First, some of Foucault conceptions are exposed, specially those who ink themselves with the question of the political power and notions akin to the Military Science's development. After, it’s general André Beaufre time of being judged by us, as we compare him with Clausewitz and Liddell Hart, Strategy’s theoreticians as him. After, the notion of National Power ´s exposed. Finally, we make a balance of the possible intersection between the three exposés.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信