二绒毛膜双胎妊娠超声测量羊水最深垂直袋的中国人群参考曲线及其与妊娠结局的关系

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Zhengxin Lyu, Tianchen Wu, Shan Lu, P. Yuan, Yangyu Zhao, Yuan Wei
{"title":"二绒毛膜双胎妊娠超声测量羊水最深垂直袋的中国人群参考曲线及其与妊娠结局的关系","authors":"Zhengxin Lyu, Tianchen Wu, Shan Lu, P. Yuan, Yangyu Zhao, Yuan Wei","doi":"10.1097/fm9.0000000000000208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n This study aimed to establish the Chinese population's amniotic fluid deepest vertical pocket (DVP) reference curves for dichorionic twin pregnancies and to investigate DVP links with adverse perinatal outcomes.\n \n \n \n This retrospective cohort study, conducted at Peking University Third Hospital from August 2011 to December 2020, used data from 375 women aged 20 to 45 years who had dichorionic twin pregnancies that were confirmed through first-trimester ultrasound. After exclusions, reference curves were developed using 318 women with 3299 DVP scans, and the data analyzed included maternal demographics, pregnancy outcomes, ultrasound measurements, and neonatal information. DVPs were assessed via ultrasound at regular intervals and grouped by gestational age (GA) for analyses. Linear mixed models were used to create amniotic fluid reference curves. Associations between abnormalities and adverse perinatal outcomes were examined using Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests. Logistic regression provided both crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR), adjusting for pre-pregnancy weight, age, ethnicity, parity, and conception mode. Significance was set at P < 0.05 with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and the analyses were conducted using SPSS ver. 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) and SAS ver. 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) software.\n \n \n \n DVP increased from the first trimester to a maximum at 26 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.7–8.3 cm for twin 1 and 2.8–7.9 cm for twin 2) and then decreased gradually toward term. Differences between twins 1 and 2 were significant after 26 weeks (95% CI for twin 1: 5.3, 5.5; 95% CI for twin 2: 4.4,4.5; P < 0.010). Polyhydramnios of twin 1 increased the risk of large for GA. Oligohydramnios of twin 1 increased the risk of small for GA. Polyhydramnios of twin 2 increased the risk of small for GA, premature birth, and neonatal complications. Oligohydramnios of twin 2 increased the risk of preeclampsia, hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy, and premature rupture of membranes.\n \n \n \n Reference curves for twin amniotic fluid volumes vary by GA and differ between twins, with potential implications for pregnancy outcomes.\n","PeriodicalId":53202,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-Fetal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chinese Population Reference Curves for Ultrasound-Measured Amniotic Fluid Deepest Vertical Pocket in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies, and Their Associations With Pregnancy Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Zhengxin Lyu, Tianchen Wu, Shan Lu, P. Yuan, Yangyu Zhao, Yuan Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/fm9.0000000000000208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n This study aimed to establish the Chinese population's amniotic fluid deepest vertical pocket (DVP) reference curves for dichorionic twin pregnancies and to investigate DVP links with adverse perinatal outcomes.\\n \\n \\n \\n This retrospective cohort study, conducted at Peking University Third Hospital from August 2011 to December 2020, used data from 375 women aged 20 to 45 years who had dichorionic twin pregnancies that were confirmed through first-trimester ultrasound. After exclusions, reference curves were developed using 318 women with 3299 DVP scans, and the data analyzed included maternal demographics, pregnancy outcomes, ultrasound measurements, and neonatal information. DVPs were assessed via ultrasound at regular intervals and grouped by gestational age (GA) for analyses. Linear mixed models were used to create amniotic fluid reference curves. Associations between abnormalities and adverse perinatal outcomes were examined using Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests. Logistic regression provided both crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR), adjusting for pre-pregnancy weight, age, ethnicity, parity, and conception mode. Significance was set at P < 0.05 with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and the analyses were conducted using SPSS ver. 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) and SAS ver. 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) software.\\n \\n \\n \\n DVP increased from the first trimester to a maximum at 26 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.7–8.3 cm for twin 1 and 2.8–7.9 cm for twin 2) and then decreased gradually toward term. Differences between twins 1 and 2 were significant after 26 weeks (95% CI for twin 1: 5.3, 5.5; 95% CI for twin 2: 4.4,4.5; P < 0.010). Polyhydramnios of twin 1 increased the risk of large for GA. Oligohydramnios of twin 1 increased the risk of small for GA. Polyhydramnios of twin 2 increased the risk of small for GA, premature birth, and neonatal complications. Oligohydramnios of twin 2 increased the risk of preeclampsia, hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy, and premature rupture of membranes.\\n \\n \\n \\n Reference curves for twin amniotic fluid volumes vary by GA and differ between twins, with potential implications for pregnancy outcomes.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":53202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal-Fetal Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal-Fetal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/fm9.0000000000000208\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal-Fetal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fm9.0000000000000208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在建立中国人群二绒毛膜双胎妊娠羊水最深垂直袋(DVP)参考曲线,并探讨DVP与围产期不良结局的关系。 这项回顾性队列研究于2011年8月至2020年12月在北京大学第三医院进行,使用了375名年龄在20至45岁之间、经一胎超声检查确诊为二绒毛膜双胎妊娠的女性的数据。经排除后,利用 318 名妇女的 3299 次 DVP 扫描结果绘制了参考曲线,分析的数据包括产妇人口统计学、妊娠结局、超声测量结果和新生儿信息。通过超声波定期评估DVP,并按胎龄(GA)分组进行分析。线性混合模型用于创建羊水参考曲线。异常与围产期不良结局之间的关联采用卡方检验或费雪精确检验。逻辑回归提供了粗略和调整后的几率比(OR),并对孕前体重、年龄、种族、胎次和受孕方式进行了调整。显著性设定为 P < 0.05,置信区间(CI)为 95%,分析使用 SPSS ver.26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) 和 SAS ver.9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) 软件进行分析。 DVP从妊娠头三个月开始增加,到26周时达到最大值(95%置信区间(CI),双胞胎1号为2.7-8.3厘米,双胞胎2号为2.8-7.9厘米),然后在临产前逐渐下降。双胎 1 和双胎 2 在 26 周后差异显著(双胎 1 的 95% 置信区间:5.3、5.5;双胎 2 的 95% 置信区间:4.4、4.5;P <0.010)。双胞胎 1 的多胎妊娠增加了 GA 的巨大风险。双胎 1 的低水肿会增加 GA 偏小的风险。双胞胎 2 的多胎妊娠会增加胎儿畸形、早产和新生儿并发症的风险。双胞胎 2 的低水肿会增加先兆子痫、妊娠并发高血压疾病和胎膜早破的风险。 双胞胎羊水量的参考曲线因GA而异,双胞胎之间也存在差异,这对妊娠结局有潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chinese Population Reference Curves for Ultrasound-Measured Amniotic Fluid Deepest Vertical Pocket in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies, and Their Associations With Pregnancy Outcomes
This study aimed to establish the Chinese population's amniotic fluid deepest vertical pocket (DVP) reference curves for dichorionic twin pregnancies and to investigate DVP links with adverse perinatal outcomes. This retrospective cohort study, conducted at Peking University Third Hospital from August 2011 to December 2020, used data from 375 women aged 20 to 45 years who had dichorionic twin pregnancies that were confirmed through first-trimester ultrasound. After exclusions, reference curves were developed using 318 women with 3299 DVP scans, and the data analyzed included maternal demographics, pregnancy outcomes, ultrasound measurements, and neonatal information. DVPs were assessed via ultrasound at regular intervals and grouped by gestational age (GA) for analyses. Linear mixed models were used to create amniotic fluid reference curves. Associations between abnormalities and adverse perinatal outcomes were examined using Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests. Logistic regression provided both crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR), adjusting for pre-pregnancy weight, age, ethnicity, parity, and conception mode. Significance was set at P < 0.05 with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and the analyses were conducted using SPSS ver. 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) and SAS ver. 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) software. DVP increased from the first trimester to a maximum at 26 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.7–8.3 cm for twin 1 and 2.8–7.9 cm for twin 2) and then decreased gradually toward term. Differences between twins 1 and 2 were significant after 26 weeks (95% CI for twin 1: 5.3, 5.5; 95% CI for twin 2: 4.4,4.5; P < 0.010). Polyhydramnios of twin 1 increased the risk of large for GA. Oligohydramnios of twin 1 increased the risk of small for GA. Polyhydramnios of twin 2 increased the risk of small for GA, premature birth, and neonatal complications. Oligohydramnios of twin 2 increased the risk of preeclampsia, hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy, and premature rupture of membranes. Reference curves for twin amniotic fluid volumes vary by GA and differ between twins, with potential implications for pregnancy outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Maternal-Fetal Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
119
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信