{"title":"俾路支土著语言中的复音词 VOT","authors":"N. A. Syed, Shah Bibi","doi":"10.1075/jsls.23002.sye","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Different models of L3 acquisition have different predictions about the cross-linguistic effects of previous\n learning. The ‘Cumulative Enhancement Model’ predicts that both L1 and L2 have cumulative facilitative effects on L3, but L2 the\n Status Factor (L2SF) claims that L2 has stronger effects on L3 acquisition. Similarly, while the Typological Primacy Model claims\n that among the already acquired languages, a typologically similar language transfers more properties to L3, the Linguistic\n Proximity Model predicts a transfer of structurally similar properties from the previously learnt languages. On the other hand,\n the Scalpel Model, besides considering linguistic similarity, gives importance to factors such as frequency of use and nature of\n the input, language dominance, and learning context. The current paper contributes to this debate by presenting data collected\n from two groups of Balochi learners of English in Balochistan (Pakistan) who were taught British English (BrE) aspiration contrast\n in plosives at the allophonic level after they had acquired Pakistani English (PakE) as adult L2 learners. Thus, Balochi was L1,\n PakE L2, and BrE L3 of the learners. After teaching for more than a year, the learners were tested for accuracy in VOTs for BrE\n plosives. The results support the L2SF and Scalpel Model.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VOT for plosives in the indigenous languages of Balochistan\",\"authors\":\"N. A. Syed, Shah Bibi\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jsls.23002.sye\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Different models of L3 acquisition have different predictions about the cross-linguistic effects of previous\\n learning. The ‘Cumulative Enhancement Model’ predicts that both L1 and L2 have cumulative facilitative effects on L3, but L2 the\\n Status Factor (L2SF) claims that L2 has stronger effects on L3 acquisition. Similarly, while the Typological Primacy Model claims\\n that among the already acquired languages, a typologically similar language transfers more properties to L3, the Linguistic\\n Proximity Model predicts a transfer of structurally similar properties from the previously learnt languages. On the other hand,\\n the Scalpel Model, besides considering linguistic similarity, gives importance to factors such as frequency of use and nature of\\n the input, language dominance, and learning context. The current paper contributes to this debate by presenting data collected\\n from two groups of Balochi learners of English in Balochistan (Pakistan) who were taught British English (BrE) aspiration contrast\\n in plosives at the allophonic level after they had acquired Pakistani English (PakE) as adult L2 learners. Thus, Balochi was L1,\\n PakE L2, and BrE L3 of the learners. After teaching for more than a year, the learners were tested for accuracy in VOTs for BrE\\n plosives. The results support the L2SF and Scalpel Model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.23002.sye\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.23002.sye","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
VOT for plosives in the indigenous languages of Balochistan
Different models of L3 acquisition have different predictions about the cross-linguistic effects of previous
learning. The ‘Cumulative Enhancement Model’ predicts that both L1 and L2 have cumulative facilitative effects on L3, but L2 the
Status Factor (L2SF) claims that L2 has stronger effects on L3 acquisition. Similarly, while the Typological Primacy Model claims
that among the already acquired languages, a typologically similar language transfers more properties to L3, the Linguistic
Proximity Model predicts a transfer of structurally similar properties from the previously learnt languages. On the other hand,
the Scalpel Model, besides considering linguistic similarity, gives importance to factors such as frequency of use and nature of
the input, language dominance, and learning context. The current paper contributes to this debate by presenting data collected
from two groups of Balochi learners of English in Balochistan (Pakistan) who were taught British English (BrE) aspiration contrast
in plosives at the allophonic level after they had acquired Pakistani English (PakE) as adult L2 learners. Thus, Balochi was L1,
PakE L2, and BrE L3 of the learners. After teaching for more than a year, the learners were tested for accuracy in VOTs for BrE
plosives. The results support the L2SF and Scalpel Model.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.