性别政治包容和民主对环境绩效的影响:矩量回归法的证据

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Simplice A. Asongu, Cheikh T. Ndour, Judith C. M. Ngoungou
{"title":"性别政治包容和民主对环境绩效的影响:矩量回归法的证据","authors":"Simplice A. Asongu,&nbsp;Cheikh T. Ndour,&nbsp;Judith C. M. Ngoungou","doi":"10.1111/polp.12576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Motivated by the difficulty of ensuring gender equality and the chaotic state of democracy, we analyze the effects of gender political inclusion and democracy on environmental policy performance. The study uses a panel of 45 African countries over the period 2012–2018 and employs the method of moments by quantile regression. The results show that gender political inclusion and democracy positively affect environmental performance in all quantiles. These positive effects tend to be stronger at higher quantiles. The magnitude is larger for gender political inclusion. When performance is decomposed into the sub-indices of environmental health and ecosystem vitality, positive effects of gender political inclusion and democracy are observed in all quantiles. The effects are larger for the gender dimension than for the democracy dimension, regardless of the sub-index used.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Bingham, Natasha. 2016. “Fighting for Our Cause: The Impact of Women's NGOs on Gender Policy Adoption in Four Former Soviet Republics.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 44(2): 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12155.</p>\n \n <p>Hankivsky, Olena. 2013. “Gender Mainstreaming: A Five-Country Examination.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 41(5): 629–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12037.</p>\n \n <p>Nchofoung, Tii, Simplice Asongu, Vanessa Tchamyou, and Ofeh Edoh. 2022. “Gender, Political Inclusion, and Democracy in Africa: Some Empirical Evidence.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 51(1): 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12505.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"52 1","pages":"118-139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/polp.12576","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of gender political inclusion and democracy on environmental performance: Evidence from the method of moments by quantile regression\",\"authors\":\"Simplice A. Asongu,&nbsp;Cheikh T. Ndour,&nbsp;Judith C. M. Ngoungou\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/polp.12576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Motivated by the difficulty of ensuring gender equality and the chaotic state of democracy, we analyze the effects of gender political inclusion and democracy on environmental policy performance. The study uses a panel of 45 African countries over the period 2012–2018 and employs the method of moments by quantile regression. The results show that gender political inclusion and democracy positively affect environmental performance in all quantiles. These positive effects tend to be stronger at higher quantiles. The magnitude is larger for gender political inclusion. When performance is decomposed into the sub-indices of environmental health and ecosystem vitality, positive effects of gender political inclusion and democracy are observed in all quantiles. The effects are larger for the gender dimension than for the democracy dimension, regardless of the sub-index used.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\\n \\n <p>Bingham, Natasha. 2016. “Fighting for Our Cause: The Impact of Women's NGOs on Gender Policy Adoption in Four Former Soviet Republics.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 44(2): 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12155.</p>\\n \\n <p>Hankivsky, Olena. 2013. “Gender Mainstreaming: A Five-Country Examination.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 41(5): 629–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12037.</p>\\n \\n <p>Nchofoung, Tii, Simplice Asongu, Vanessa Tchamyou, and Ofeh Edoh. 2022. “Gender, Political Inclusion, and Democracy in Africa: Some Empirical Evidence.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 51(1): 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12505.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics & Policy\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"118-139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/polp.12576\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于确保性别平等的难度和民主的混乱状态,我们分析了性别政治包容和民主对环境政策绩效的影响。研究使用了 2012-2018 年期间 45 个非洲国家的面板数据,并采用了矩量回归方法。结果显示,性别政治包容和民主对所有量级的环境绩效都有积极影响。在较高的量级上,这些积极影响往往更强。性别政治包容的影响幅度更大。如果将环境绩效分解为环境健康和生态系统活力这两个子指数,则可观察到性别政治包容和民主对所有量级都有积极影响。无论使用何种子指数,性别维度的影响都大于民主维度。2016."为我们的事业而战:妇女非政府组织对四个前苏联共和国性别政策采纳的影响》。政治与政策》44(2):294–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12155.Hankivsky, Olena.2013."性别主流化:A Five-Country Examination."政治与政策》41(5):https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12037.Nchofoung, Tii, Simplice Asongu, Vanessa Tchamyou, and Ofeh Edoh.2022."非洲的性别、政治包容和民主:一些经验证据"。Politics & Policy 51(1):137–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12505.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The effects of gender political inclusion and democracy on environmental performance: Evidence from the method of moments by quantile regression

The effects of gender political inclusion and democracy on environmental performance: Evidence from the method of moments by quantile regression

Motivated by the difficulty of ensuring gender equality and the chaotic state of democracy, we analyze the effects of gender political inclusion and democracy on environmental policy performance. The study uses a panel of 45 African countries over the period 2012–2018 and employs the method of moments by quantile regression. The results show that gender political inclusion and democracy positively affect environmental performance in all quantiles. These positive effects tend to be stronger at higher quantiles. The magnitude is larger for gender political inclusion. When performance is decomposed into the sub-indices of environmental health and ecosystem vitality, positive effects of gender political inclusion and democracy are observed in all quantiles. The effects are larger for the gender dimension than for the democracy dimension, regardless of the sub-index used.

Related Articles

Bingham, Natasha. 2016. “Fighting for Our Cause: The Impact of Women's NGOs on Gender Policy Adoption in Four Former Soviet Republics.” Politics & Policy 44(2): 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12155.

Hankivsky, Olena. 2013. “Gender Mainstreaming: A Five-Country Examination.” Politics & Policy 41(5): 629–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12037.

Nchofoung, Tii, Simplice Asongu, Vanessa Tchamyou, and Ofeh Edoh. 2022. “Gender, Political Inclusion, and Democracy in Africa: Some Empirical Evidence.” Politics & Policy 51(1): 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12505.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Policy
Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信