离婚后保持联系:青少年子女和非寄宿父母的观点

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Melinda Stafford Markham, Becky DeGreeff, Erin Guyette
{"title":"离婚后保持联系:青少年子女和非寄宿父母的观点","authors":"Melinda Stafford Markham,&nbsp;Becky DeGreeff,&nbsp;Erin Guyette","doi":"10.1111/fare.12994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The purpose of this study was to investigate how nonresidential parents and adolescent children maintained their relationships and communicated with one another following parental divorce.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>A substantial proportion of children whose parents have divorced live with one parent and have less contact with the other parent. It is important to understand nonresidential parent–child relationships and the role communication technology plays in relationship maintenance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative interviews were conducted with a total of 34 adolescent and nonresidential parent participants (10 nonresidential parent–child dyads and 14 individual participants) to understand how nonresidential parents and children maintain their relationship following parental divorce and how they use communication technology to stay connected from a distance. Thematic analysis techniques (Braun &amp; Clarke, 2006) were used to analyze the data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Three common positive factors or “benefits” relating to nonresidential parent–adolescent relationship closeness emerged: planned physical visits, frequent communication using multiple communication methods, and same sex of parent and child. Factors that served as barriers that interfered with nonresidential parent–adolescent relationship closeness were identified: residential parent interference, perceived child disengagement or lack of interest, and child blocking methods of communication.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The results of this study provide additional insight and understanding that will help positively influence nonresidential parent–child relationships.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Practitioners can help nonresidential parents identify communication technologies they can use with their adolescents and ways of reducing existing communication barriers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"73 3","pages":"2170-2192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Staying connected after divorce: Adolescent child and nonresidential parent perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Melinda Stafford Markham,&nbsp;Becky DeGreeff,&nbsp;Erin Guyette\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fare.12994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The purpose of this study was to investigate how nonresidential parents and adolescent children maintained their relationships and communicated with one another following parental divorce.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>A substantial proportion of children whose parents have divorced live with one parent and have less contact with the other parent. It is important to understand nonresidential parent–child relationships and the role communication technology plays in relationship maintenance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Qualitative interviews were conducted with a total of 34 adolescent and nonresidential parent participants (10 nonresidential parent–child dyads and 14 individual participants) to understand how nonresidential parents and children maintain their relationship following parental divorce and how they use communication technology to stay connected from a distance. Thematic analysis techniques (Braun &amp; Clarke, 2006) were used to analyze the data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Three common positive factors or “benefits” relating to nonresidential parent–adolescent relationship closeness emerged: planned physical visits, frequent communication using multiple communication methods, and same sex of parent and child. Factors that served as barriers that interfered with nonresidential parent–adolescent relationship closeness were identified: residential parent interference, perceived child disengagement or lack of interest, and child blocking methods of communication.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results of this study provide additional insight and understanding that will help positively influence nonresidential parent–child relationships.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>Practitioners can help nonresidential parents identify communication technologies they can use with their adolescents and ways of reducing existing communication barriers.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Relations\",\"volume\":\"73 3\",\"pages\":\"2170-2192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.12994\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.12994","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是调查父母离婚后,非住家父母与青少年子女之间如何保持关系并相互沟通。父母离婚后,相当一部分子女与父母中的一方生活在一起,与另一方的联系较少。我们对 34 名青少年和非住家父母参与者(10 个非住家亲子二人组和 14 名个人参与者)进行了定性访谈,以了解非住家父母和子女在父母离婚后如何保持关系,以及他们如何使用通信技术保持远距离联系。分析数据时使用了主题分析技术(Braun 和 Clarke,2006 年)。在非住宿父母与青少年关系亲密方面,出现了三个共同的积极因素或 "好处":有计划的实际探访、使用多种交流方式进行频繁交流以及父母和子女的性别相同。这项研究的结果提供了更多的洞察力和理解力,有助于积极影响非住宿父母与青少年之间的关系。实践者可以帮助非住宿父母确定他们可以与青少年使用的交流技术,以及减少现有交流障碍的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Staying connected after divorce: Adolescent child and nonresidential parent perspectives

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate how nonresidential parents and adolescent children maintained their relationships and communicated with one another following parental divorce.

Background

A substantial proportion of children whose parents have divorced live with one parent and have less contact with the other parent. It is important to understand nonresidential parent–child relationships and the role communication technology plays in relationship maintenance.

Method

Qualitative interviews were conducted with a total of 34 adolescent and nonresidential parent participants (10 nonresidential parent–child dyads and 14 individual participants) to understand how nonresidential parents and children maintain their relationship following parental divorce and how they use communication technology to stay connected from a distance. Thematic analysis techniques (Braun & Clarke, 2006) were used to analyze the data.

Results

Three common positive factors or “benefits” relating to nonresidential parent–adolescent relationship closeness emerged: planned physical visits, frequent communication using multiple communication methods, and same sex of parent and child. Factors that served as barriers that interfered with nonresidential parent–adolescent relationship closeness were identified: residential parent interference, perceived child disengagement or lack of interest, and child blocking methods of communication.

Conclusion

The results of this study provide additional insight and understanding that will help positively influence nonresidential parent–child relationships.

Implications

Practitioners can help nonresidential parents identify communication technologies they can use with their adolescents and ways of reducing existing communication barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信